Scanned sites / www.bestinwinnipeg.com / 2026-09-12-1636

www.bestinwinnipeg.com scan from 2026-09-12 16:36:50 UTC DR 64

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.bestinwinnipeg.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-1636

Scanned 2026-09-12 16:36:50 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 22:06:29 UTC

Site: https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

76/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1286 pages and 935 assets of www.bestinwinnipeg.com, starting from https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/. It scored 76 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (1,057), heavy assets (8), links to other sites (142); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−5.5), heavy assets (−4.8), links to other sites (−4). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 3 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1286
Assets fetched
935
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

2,221 of 2,287 discovered URLs were fetched, 66 blocked by robots.txt, 24,534 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 8432 left unchecked.

  • Title tags344 issues
    344 of 1057 pages have title issues. 101 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3 points
  • Meta descriptions418 issues
    418 of 1057 pages have meta description issues. 101 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.9 points
  • Headings6 issues
    6 of 1057 pages have heading issues. 101 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links96 issues
    96 internal links point at 96 broken URLs.
    −1.7 points
  • Links to other sites142 issues
    142 destinations answered with an error, 51 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 8432 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −4 points
  • Redirects19 issues
    19 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses110 issues
    130 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 128 of them are pages, 110 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.9 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability101 issues
    101 of 1158 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.9 points
  • Image alt text1,010 issues
    1010 of 11412 image references have no alt attribute. 2869 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.5 points
  • Heavy assets8 issues
    8 assets larger than 500 KB among 935 fetched assets.
    −4.8 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage1,057 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 1057 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.5 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin content33 issues
    33 of 1057 pages have fewer than 200 words. 101 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format45 noted
    45 of 1286 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals101 noted
    101 of 1158 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives1,158 noted
    1158 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text8 noted
    8 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure350 noted
    350 of 1057 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 101 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length29 noted
    27 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 1158 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 2221 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 1158 pages; 1023 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 78 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2333 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.bestinwinnipeg.com scores 76%, higher than 35% of the 2333 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites76% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several SEO issues needing attention. Prioritize fixing broken links and non-200 responses for better user experience. Improve title tags and meta descriptions for better search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links lead to poor user experience and impact SEO.

    How: Update broken links to direct to correct URLs or remove them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages not returning a 2xx status frustrate users and hurt rankings.

    How: Fix or redirect URLs that return 4xx or 5xx errors.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Improper title tags affect search rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Revise title tags to be between 30-60 characters, relevant to page content.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Effective meta descriptions increase click-through rates from search results.

    How: Write unique meta descriptions for each page, under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing H1 Headings

    Why: Missing H1s can confuse search engines and impact content relevance.

    How: Ensure each page has one clear H1 heading relevant to its content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: A complete sitemap ensures all pages are indexed by search engines.

    How: Include all relevant pages in your sitemap.xml and resubmit to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security weaknesses related to headers that protect against various attacks and secure user connections. Immediate implementation of these headers is recommended to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted if they access the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted script and style loading, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self'; style-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Not using X-Frame-Options exposes the site to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without it, browsers may incorrectly execute files due to content type.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Loading many resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages can compromise security.

    Fix: Change resource URLs from HTTP to HTTPS to prevent potential data leakage.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from third-party domains without integrity checks can lead to security vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) or add CSP to restrict the sources of these scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/activities/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/attractions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/fitness/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/news-events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/banking/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/credit-cards/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/investments/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/loans/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/other-financial-products/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 1158 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/activities/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/attractions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/fitness/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/news-events/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/banking/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/credit-cards/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/investments/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/loans/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/other-financial-products/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/activities/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/attractions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/fitness/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/news-events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/banking/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/credit-cards/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/investments/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/loans/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/other-financial-products/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/activities/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/attractions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/fitness/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/entertainment/news-events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/banking/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/credit-cards/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/investments/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/loans/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/money/other-financial-products/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    7535 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/The-SPOONER-Group.jpg
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Castle-Mortgage-Group.jpg
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/One-Link-Mortgage-Financial.jpg
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Ron-Chan-Mortgage-Broker-INVIS-Winnipeg.j…
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Peter-Paley-Associates-Dominion-Lending-C…
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Ideal-Mortgage-Solutions.jpg
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Paul-Deck-Mortgages.jpg
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Shirl-Funk.jpg
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Castle-Mortgage-Group-Jason-Kilborne.jpg
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-mortgage-brokers-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/IMG_4191.png
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-paper-shredding-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/The-UPS-Store.jpg
    • https://www.bestinwinnipeg.com/best-paper-shredding-winnipeg/ loads image http://35.182.249.74/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/RecordXpress.jpg
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 1158 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    54 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.bestinwinnipeg.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.bestinwinnipeg.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.bestinwinnipeg.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.bestinwinnipeg.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.