Scanned sites / www.beddingtondentalclinic.com / 2026-09-23-1809

www.beddingtondentalclinic.com scan from 2026-09-23 18:09:33 UTC DR 7

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.beddingtondentalclinic.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-23-1809

Scanned 2026-09-23 18:09:33 UTC, finished 2026-09-23 18:26:46 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On September 23, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 156 pages and 912 assets of www.beddingtondentalclinic.com, starting from https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by sitemap coverage (107), heavy assets (7), meta descriptions (55); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to sitemap coverage (−4.3), heavy assets (−4.2), meta descriptions (−3). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 4 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
156
Assets fetched
912
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,068 of 1,069 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 18 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags39 issues
    39 of 147 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.6 points
  • Meta descriptions55 issues
    55 of 147 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 147 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites298 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 9 destinations checked.
  • Redirects8 issues
    8 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses8 noted
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 8 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 147 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design. 1 noindex page is listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore it.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt text3 issues
    3 of 923 image references have no alt attribute. 112 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets7 issues
    7 assets larger than 500 KB among 912 fetched assets.
    −4.2 points
  • Orphan pages80 issues
    80 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage107 issues
    1 sitemap listing 122 URLs: 26 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 80 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.3 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 148 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 147 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format4 noted
    4 of 156 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 148 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives148 noted
    148 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text13 noted
    13 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure50 noted
    50 of 147 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length73 noted
    73 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies7 noted
    7 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 148 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 1068 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 148 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 47 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2877 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.beddingtondentalclinic.com scores 83%, higher than 61% of the 2877 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0761510%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 53 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 83 sites75%: 86 sites76%: 94 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 112 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 133 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 132 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 19 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 151 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues need fixing to improve SEO and usability. Focus on addressing title and meta description problems, resolving non-200 responses, and managing redirects effectively.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: Improving title length enhances click-through rates and rankings.

    How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters; ensure they are relevant to the page content.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: Proper meta descriptions increase search visibility and CTR.

    How: Rewrite long or missing meta descriptions to be concise (under 160 characters) and keyword-rich.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Status Codes

    Why: Fixing pages that do not return a 200 response improves user experience.

    How: Redirect or fix broken URLs returning 301 or other non-200 status codes.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Manage Redirects Effectively

    Why: Reducing unnecessary redirects enhances site speed and usability.

    How: Eliminate or simplify redirects where possible, aiming for direct navigation.

    Checks: redirects

  5. 5

    Add Alt Text to Images

    Why: Enhances accessibility and SEO for image searches.

    How: Provide descriptive alt attributes for images lacking them.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Fix Sitemap Coverage Issues

    Why: Ensures all relevant pages are indexed and discoverable.

    How: Update the sitemap to include pages not listed and remove noindex for relevant URLs.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This security review identifies critical and medium-risk issues on your website that can expose users and your operations to cyber threats. Immediate attention is needed to implement secure headers and policies to strengthen your site's defenses.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 4 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, initial requests to your site without HTTPS are vulnerable to interception.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted script and resource loading, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this protection, your pages could be embedded in frames for clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this, browsers may wrongly execute files due to misleading content types.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Lack of Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive URL information may be exposed when users navigate away.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  6. 6

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Exposing the server version makes it easier for attackers to find known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or modify the 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers to obscure version details.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Using external scripts without SRI increases risk if those scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing SRI or a robust Content-Security-Policy that restricts sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  8. 8

    No Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Absence of this policy may expose unused browser features to potentially malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=(), camera=(), microphone=().

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  9. 9

    Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Disallowed paths in robots.txt are publicly visible, which could aid malicious probing.

    Fix: Ensure sensitive paths are protected with access controls instead of relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/canadian-dental-care-plan/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/our-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/tour-the-office/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/saturday-dentist/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/patient-forms/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/financials/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/all-on-4-teeth-in-a-day/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/amalgam-free/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/bone-graft/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 148 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/canadian-dental-care-plan/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/our-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/tour-the-office/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/saturday-dentist/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/patient-forms/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/financials/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/all-on-4-teeth-in-a-day/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/amalgam-free/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/bone-graft/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/canadian-dental-care-plan/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/our-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/tour-the-office/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/saturday-dentist/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/patient-forms/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/financials/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/all-on-4-teeth-in-a-day/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/amalgam-free/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/bone-graft/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/canadian-dental-care-plan/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/our-team/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/tour-the-office/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/saturday-dentist/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/patient-forms/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/financials/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/all-on-4-teeth-in-a-day/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/amalgam-free/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/bone-graft/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/canadian-dental-care-plan/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/our-team/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/tour-the-office/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/blog/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/saturday-dentist/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/privacy-policy/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/patient-forms/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/financials/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/all-on-4-teeth-in-a-day/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/amalgam-free/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/bone-graft/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/canadian-dental-care-plan/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/our-team/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/tour-the-office/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/blog/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/saturday-dentist/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/privacy-policy/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/patient-forms/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/financials/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/all-on-4-teeth-in-a-day/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/amalgam-free/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beddingtondentalclinic.com/service/bone-graft/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: cloudflare (1068 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Rocket/3.21.0.1 (2 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (120 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.callrail.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 148 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.beddingtondentalclinic.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beddingtondentalclinic.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.beddingtondentalclinic.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beddingtondentalclinic.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.