Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-11-08-1203
www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 2026-11-08 12:03:38 UTC DR 13
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-11-08-1203
Scanned 2026-11-08 12:03:38 UTC, finished 2026-11-08 12:09:50 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On November 8, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 158 pages and 659 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (74), title tags (58), meta descriptions (72); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.9), meta descriptions (−3.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 158
- Assets fetched
- 659
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 9 of 33
817 of 823 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 96 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags58 issues58 of 147 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.9 points
- Meta descriptions72 issues72 of 147 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.8 points
- Headings3 issues3 of 147 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.1 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites5 issues5 destinations answered with an error, 46 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 96 destinations checked.−1.3 points
- Redirects7 issues9 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.−0.2 points
- Non-200 responses9 noted9 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 8 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability2 issues2 of 147 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.−0.1 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 1933 image references have no alt attribute. 1147 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets74 issues74 assets larger than 500 KB among 659 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pages25 issues25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.7 points
- Sitemap coverage32 issues9 sitemaps listing 144 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.3 points
- Internal link counts7 notedInternal link counts for 150 pages; 7 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 147 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 158 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- Canonicals1 noted1 of 150 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives150 noted150 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text14 noted14 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure32 noted32 of 147 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length95 noted94 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies6 noted6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validationOKAll 150 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured dataOK48 of 147 indexable pages carry structured data: Product (34), Offer (34), Organization (34), BreadcrumbList (13), ListItem (13). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
- Near duplicatesOKNo near duplicates among 99 pages with enough text to compare.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 150 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positions15 noted15 of 124 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
- Pagination2 noted10 pages in pagination sequences; 2 with problems.
- Headers and cookiesOK1 cookie set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 817 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 150 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- Spelling100 noted100 words an English dictionary does not know, on 77 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2877 sites, median 80%, average 79%
www.beautyrewind.ca scores 83%, higher than 61% of the 2877 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour website shows some SEO issues that need immediate attention, particularly with redirects, indexability, and meta descriptions. Addressing these will help improve your site's visibility and usability.
- 1
Fix Redirects
Why: 9 URLs are redirecting, which can confuse search engines and waste crawl budget.
How: Update the redirect rules for the listed URLs to ensure they point directly to the intended destinations.
Checks: redirects
- 2
Resolve Non-200 Responses
Why: 9 URLs return non-200 responses, which can negatively impact user experience and SEO.
How: Identify and correct or remove any broken links or misconfigurations causing these responses.
Checks: status-codes
- 3
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: 72 pages lack effective meta descriptions, which may reduce click-through rates from search results.
How: Create unique, descriptive meta descriptions for the 22 pages lacking them.
Evidence: 22 pages have no meta description at all.
22 pages affected
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 4
Optimize Title Tags
Why: 58 pages have title issues that could hinder their search engine rankings.
How: Revise title tags to ensure they are the appropriate length and accurately reflect page content.
Checks: titles
- 5
Fix Indexability Issues
Why: 2 pages are noindex but included in your sitemap, contradicting indexing attempts.
How: Remove these pages from the sitemap or adjust their indexing directives.
Checks: indexability
- 6
Address Heavy Assets
Why: Multiple heavy assets can slow down page load times, affecting user experience and SEO rankings.
How: Compress or optimize the listed images and stylesheets to improve load times.
Evidence: 816 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 150 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.
150 pages affected
Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.
Checks: heavy-assets
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe security review of beautyrewind.ca reveals critical issues in response headers that may expose users to security risks. Key findings include the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security and Clickjacking protection. Implementing recommended headers will enhance site security.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 2 low
- 2 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: No HSTS header prevents users from being automatically redirected to HTTPS, risking interception.
Fix: Add the following header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium
Why it matters: Absent X-Frame-Options increases the risk of Clickjacking attacks, allowing malicious framing of your pages.
Fix: Set the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or use Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'self'.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Missing Referrer PolicyLow
Why it matters: Not specifying a Referrer Policy can expose sensitive URL information when users click links.
Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade.
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 4
Third-party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Running scripts from external domains without SRI makes the site vulnerable to script tampering.
Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity or a CSP that limits allowed external scripts.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 5
Missing Permissions PolicyInfo
Why it matters: Without a Permissions Policy, unnecessary browser features remain accessible, potentially exposing users.
Fix: Include the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=().
Evidence: Permissions policy
- 6
Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: The Disallow entry for /wp-admin/ doesn't restrict access; it may expose sensitive paths.
Fix: Review and secure access to sensitive directories through proper authentication measures.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
2 of 150 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no permissions-policy
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 150 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 150 pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 150 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableForms over HTTPS
No forms were found on the sampled pages.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- decadentbrulee.caDR 984/100 · rank 873 · 1 page
- korremechanical.comDR 684/100 · rank 873 · 136 pages
- mergedeck.comDR 1184/100 · rank 873 · 200 pages
- www.physiomira.comDR 483/100 · rank 1003 · 37 pages
- calcuniverse.onlineDR 083/100 · rank 1003 · 539 pages
- distinctiveautoworks.caDR 1083/100 · rank 1003 · 173 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.beautyrewind.ca?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beautyrewind.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.