Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-11-06-2030
www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 2026-11-06 20:30:05 UTC DR 13
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
Scan 2026-11-06-2030
Scanned 2026-11-06 20:30:05 UTC, finished 2026-11-06 20:37:28 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On November 6, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 158 pages and 659 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (74), title tags (58), meta descriptions (72); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.9), meta descriptions (−3.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 158
- Assets fetched
- 659
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 9 of 33
817 of 823 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 96 link destinations on other sites were checked.
- Title tags58 issues58 of 147 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.9 points
- Meta descriptions72 issues72 of 147 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−3.8 points
- Headings3 issues3 of 147 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.−0.1 points
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Links to other sites4 issues4 destinations answered with an error, 46 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 96 destinations checked.−1.1 points
- Redirects7 issues9 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.−0.2 points
- Non-200 responses9 noted9 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 8 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- Indexability2 issues2 of 147 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.−0.1 points
- Image alt textOK0 of 1933 image references have no alt attribute. 1147 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets74 issues74 assets larger than 500 KB among 659 fetched assets.−6 points
- Orphan pages25 issues25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.−0.7 points
- Sitemap coverage32 issues9 sitemaps listing 144 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.−1.3 points
- Internal link counts7 notedInternal link counts for 150 pages; 7 worth a look.
- Thin contentOK0 of 147 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
- URL formatOKAll 158 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
- Canonicals1 noted1 of 150 pages have a canonical worth checking.
- Robots directives150 noted150 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
- Anchor text14 noted14 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
- Title and heading structure32 noted32 of 147 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Image weight and alt length95 noted94 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
- Response anomalies6 noted6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
- HTML and head validationOKAll 150 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
- hreflangOKNo page declares hreflang.
- Structured dataOK48 of 147 indexable pages carry structured data: Product (34), Offer (34), Organization (34), BreadcrumbList (13), ListItem (13). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
- Near duplicatesOKNo near duplicates among 99 pages with enough text to compare.
- Soft 404sOKNone of 150 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
- AccessibilityNot checkedNot checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
- Link positions15 noted15 of 124 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
- Pagination2 noted10 pages in pagination sequences; 2 with problems.
- Headers and cookiesOK1 cookie set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 817 URLs.
- Orphans in searchNot checkedNot checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
- Link ScoreOKLink Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 150 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
- JavaScript renderingNot checkedNot checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
- PageSpeed InsightsNot checkedNot checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
- Spelling100 noted100 words an English dictionary does not know, on 77 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%
www.beautyrewind.ca scores 83%, higher than 61% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour site has a health score of 83/100 with several issues needing attention, especially around redirects, title tags, and heavy assets. Addressing these can enhance user experience and SEO performance.
- 1
Fix Redirect Issues
Why: Removing unnecessary redirects can improve load times and user experience.
How: Update the URLs found in the redirect report to their final destinations. Replace old links with direct links.
Checks: redirects
- 2
Resolve Non-200 Responses
Why: Non-200 URLs can harm site SEO and usability.
How: Check the non-200 URLs and ensure all necessary pages respond with a 200 status. Redirect or remove outdated links.
Checks: status-codes
- 3
Update Title Tags
Why: Improving titles can enhance SEO and clarity for users.
How: Revise the titles on pages listed with issues to be between 30-60 characters, accurately reflect the content.
Checks: titles
- 4
Enhance Meta Descriptions
Why: Proper meta descriptions can improve click-through rates from search results.
How: Edit meta descriptions to be between 50-160 characters without exceeding the pixel limit.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 5
Address Heading Issues
Why: Multiple H1 tags can confuse search engines regarding page hierarchy.
How: Ensure each page has only one H1 tag and use H2-H6 appropriately for subheadings.
Checks: headings
- 6
Reduce Heavy Assets
Why: Reducing large assets can significantly improve page load times.
How: Optimize or compress the large assets found to improve performance; consider replacing them if they aren’t necessary.
Evidence: 816 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 150 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.
150 pages affected
Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.
Checks: heavy-assets
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe site lacks important security headers, which could expose visitors to risks. Immediate implementation of HSTS and X-Frame-Options is crucial, along with setting a Referrer-Policy. Additionally, addressing third-party script security and refining the robots.txt file are recommended for improved protection.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 2 low
- 2 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be exposed to interception on initial HTTP requests.
Fix: Add the header: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload`.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium
Why it matters: The absence of this header makes the site susceptible to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Add the header: `X-Frame-Options: DENY` or use a CSP directive with `frame-ancestors`.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow
Why it matters: Without this policy, sensitive page URLs could be exposed when users navigate away.
Fix: Add the header: `Referrer-Policy: no-refer` or choose an appropriate level of referrer information.
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 4
Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: These scripts are vulnerable to altered external content without integrity checks.
Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies allowed script sources.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 5
Lack of Permissions PolicyInfo
Why it matters: Not having a permissions policy leaves browser features like camera access potentially open.
Fix: Add the header: `Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=()`, or specify which features to disable.
Evidence: Permissions policy
- 6
Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: The presence of this path in robots.txt could aid malicious users in probing the site.
Fix: Consider removing the entry or implementing access control on /wp-admin/.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
2 of 150 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no permissions-policy
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 150 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 150 pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 150 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableForms over HTTPS
No forms were found on the sampled pages.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca
Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.
- decadentbrulee.caDR 1084/100 · rank 874 · 1 page
- korremechanical.comDR 684/100 · rank 874 · 136 pages
- mergedeck.comDR 1484/100 · rank 874 · 200 pages
- www.ramsayanimalclinic.caDR 2083/100 · rank 1004 · 67 pages
- distinctiveautoworks.caDR 1083/100 · rank 1004 · 173 pages
- www.northstar-chiropractic.comDR 083/100 · rank 1004 · 28 pages
DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.
Own www.beautyrewind.ca?
- Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
- Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beautyrewind.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.