Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-11-05-1059

www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 2026-11-05 10:59:40 UTC DR 13

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.beautyrewind.ca.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-05-1059

Scanned 2026-11-05 10:59:40 UTC, finished 2026-11-05 11:06:16 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On November 5, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 158 pages and 654 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (74), title tags (58), meta descriptions (72); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.9), meta descriptions (−3.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
158
Assets fetched
654
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

812 of 818 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 96 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 147 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.9 points
  • Meta descriptions72 issues
    72 of 147 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 147 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 46 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 96 destinations checked.
    −1.1 points
  • Redirects7 issues
    9 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses9 noted
    9 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 8 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 147 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1933 image references have no alt attribute. 1147 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets74 issues
    74 assets larger than 500 KB among 654 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages25 issues
    25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage32 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 144 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 150 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 147 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 158 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 150 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives150 noted
    150 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text14 noted
    14 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure32 noted
    32 of 147 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length95 noted
    94 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies6 noted
    6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 150 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    48 of 147 indexable pages carry structured data: Product (34), Offer (34), Organization (34), BreadcrumbList (13), ListItem (13). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 99 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 150 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions15 noted
    15 of 124 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination2 noted
    10 pages in pagination sequences; 2 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 812 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 150 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling100 noted
    100 words an English dictionary does not know, on 77 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2868 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.beautyrewind.ca scores 83%, higher than 61% of the 2868 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 126 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 104 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 81 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several technical SEO issues, including problems with redirects, title tags, and meta descriptions that need addressing. Fixing these will enhance your site's visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Clean Up Redirects

    Why: Multiple redirects can dilute page authority and cause user frustration.

    How: Ensure all redirected URLs (e.g., /cart/, /checkout/) point to their final destination without unnecessary hops.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages that do not return a 2xx response can harm site accessibility and SEO rankings.

    How: Check and rectify the 9 non-200 status URLs to ensure they return proper responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: 58 pages with title issues can hurt SEO effectiveness and clarity.

    How: Update short (<30 characters) and overly long (>60 characters) titles across affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Non-optimized meta descriptions reduce click-through rates in search results.

    How: Create engaging and concise meta descriptions for 72 pages that need them.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Resolve Heading Issues

    Why: Multiple H1 tags can confuse search engines and affect ranking potential.

    How: Adjust pages to maintain one H1 tag and ensure proper hierarchy among headings.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Optimize Sitemap Coverage

    Why: A well-structured sitemap ensures search engines can properly index your pages.

    How: Fix the sitemap to include all relevant URLs and remove any that are incorrect or noindex.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks several important security headers that could expose users to risks, including the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security and protections against clickjacking. Addressing these vulnerabilities is crucial to enhance the site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on the first request if they omit 'https://'.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of this header allows clickjacking attacks, enabling other sites to frame your pages.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to prevent framing.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this policy, sensitive URL details can be sent to external sites.

    Fix: Add the header 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade' to limit referrer data.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can change the site's behavior if compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that restricts these scripts or using Subresource Integrity.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: This header helps restrict access to browser features, reducing risk from potential script injections.

    Fix: Add the header 'Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()' to limit access.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  6. 6

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing /wp-admin/ in robots.txt is public and could point attackers to sensitive paths.

    Fix: Restrict access to this path through proper authentication and authorization methods.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 150 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 150 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 150 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 150 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.beautyrewind.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beautyrewind.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.