Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-10-22-1104

www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 2026-10-22 11:04:21 UTC DR 13

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-22-1104

Scanned 2026-10-22 11:04:21 UTC, finished 2026-10-22 11:12:00 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

83/ 100Good

On October 22, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 158 pages and 654 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 83 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (71), title tags (58), meta descriptions (72); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.9), meta descriptions (−3.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
158
Assets fetched
654
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

812 of 818 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 95 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 147 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.9 points
  • Meta descriptions72 issues
    72 of 147 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 147 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 47 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 95 destinations checked.
    −0.5 points
  • Redirects7 issues
    9 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses9 noted
    9 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 8 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 147 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1927 image references have no alt attribute. 1147 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets71 issues
    71 assets larger than 500 KB among 654 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages25 issues
    25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage32 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 144 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 150 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 147 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 158 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 150 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives150 noted
    150 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text14 noted
    14 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure32 noted
    32 of 147 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length92 noted
    91 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies6 noted
    6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 150 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    48 of 147 indexable pages carry structured data: Product (34), Offer (34), Organization (34), BreadcrumbList (13), ListItem (13). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 99 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 150 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions15 noted
    15 of 124 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination2 noted
    10 pages in pagination sequences; 2 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 812 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 150 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling100 noted
    100 words an English dictionary does not know, on 77 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2305 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.beautyrewind.ca scores 83%, higher than 65% of the 2305 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 43 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 68 sites74%: 69 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 62 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 45 sites92%: 36 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 11 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites83% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Several improvements are needed to enhance your site's SEO, including resolving redirects, fixing meta descriptions, and addressing heavy assets. Focus on the high-impact items first to boost performance and rankings.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can hinder user experience and SEO performance.

    How: Update the URLs to point directly to the final destination to eliminate unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 72 pages are lacking effective meta descriptions, which can impact click-through rates.

    How: Craft unique and concise meta descriptions for 22 pages and ensure they fit within recommended length.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 58 pages have title issues that can affect search engine rankings.

    How: Revise title tags on short and long titles to align with best practices.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: Indexability issues can harm page visibility in search engines.

    How: Update the sitemap to exclude noindex pages like the cart and my-account pages.

    Checks: indexability, sitemap-coverage

  5. 5

    Compress Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down site performance and user experience.

    How: Shrink images and files over 500 KB to improve load speed.

    Evidence: 816 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 150 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    150 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: 25 orphan pages are inaccessible, limiting their potential visibility.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages to make them discoverable.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website beautyrewind.ca has several security vulnerabilities, particularly in HTTP headers. Key issues include missing security related headers, which could expose users to risks like clickjacking and data leakage. Implementing strict transport security, clickjacking protection, and referrer policies is crucial to enhance user safety.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    Why it matters: No HTML page implements HTTP Strict Transport Security, allowing potential interception on the first request when accessing via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Most pages lack the X-Frame-Options header, exposing them to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Absence of Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer policy, sensitive data may leak to external sites via the full page address.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Third-party scripts lack Subresource Integrity, exposing the site to risks if these external scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy that whitelists trusted hosts and restricts inline scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: No Permissions-Policy header restricts unnecessary access to browser features, posing a potential risk if vulnerabilities are exploited.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: camera=(), microphone=(), geolocation=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file discloses potentially sensitive paths without actual access restrictions, allowing probing.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls for /wp-admin/ and consider removing its entry from robots.txt to prevent information disclosure.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 150 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/acne-and-skin-consultation/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 150 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 150 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 150 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.beautyrewind.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beautyrewind.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.