Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-10-19-0102

www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 2026-10-19 01:02:36 UTC DR 13

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-19-0102

Scanned 2026-10-19 01:02:36 UTC, finished 2026-10-19 01:10:06 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On October 19, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 160 pages and 665 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (72), meta descriptions (72), title tags (58); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.8), meta descriptions (−3.8). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
160
Assets fetched
665
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

825 of 831 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 95 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 148 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Meta descriptions72 issues
    72 of 148 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 148 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites12 issues
    12 destinations answered with an error, 35 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 95 destinations checked.
    −3.2 points
  • Redirects8 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses10 noted
    10 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 9 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 148 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1950 image references have no alt attribute. 1154 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets72 issues
    72 assets larger than 500 KB among 665 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages25 issues
    25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage32 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 145 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.3 points
  • Internal link counts7 noted
    Internal link counts for 151 pages; 7 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 148 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 160 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 151 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives151 noted
    151 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text14 noted
    14 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure32 noted
    32 of 148 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length93 noted
    92 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies7 noted
    7 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 151 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    48 of 148 indexable pages carry structured data: Product (34), Offer (34), Organization (34), BreadcrumbList (13), ListItem (13). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 100 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 151 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions16 noted
    16 of 125 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination2 noted
    10 pages in pagination sequences; 2 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 825 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 151 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling100 noted
    100 words an English dictionary does not know, on 78 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2284 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.beautyrewind.ca scores 81%, higher than 56% of the 2284 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 7 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 45 sites70%: 41 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 65 sites74%: 70 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 105 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 95 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 68 sites87%: 71 sites88%: 62 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 32 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 34 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 14 sites95%: 10 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 9 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 0 sites100%: 70 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Several SEO issues need addressing, particularly with redirects, meta descriptions, title tags, and indexability. Improving these will enhance site visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can negatively impact user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove unnecessary redirects for the URLs listed.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: 72 pages have meta description issues; this affects click-through rates.

    How: Write unique and relevant meta descriptions for all pages without one.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Correct Title Tag Issues

    Why: Improper title lengths can lead to missed opportunities in search results.

    How: Revise title tags to meet optimal lengths and relevance criteria.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: Pages listed in the sitemap shouldn't be set to 'noindex' as it confuses search engines.

    How: Ensure that pages in the sitemap are indexable as intended.

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: 25 pages without internal links may not be effectively indexed.

    How: Create internal links from other relevant pages to these orphan pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing asset sizes can improve loading times significantly.

    How: Shrink large image files and CSS files where indicated.

    Evidence: 816 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 151 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    151 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website lacks key security headers, which can expose it to risks such as data interception and clickjacking. Implementing necessary headers will enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on their first request by entering the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of clickjacking protection allows your site to be embedded in frames on other sites, risking user data.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without a referrer-policy, visitors' full URLs can be leaked when navigating away from the site.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from other domains without integrity checks can pose security risks if those domains are compromised.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity where possible or use a Content-Security-Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: A permissions-policy header limits browser features, reducing risk if an attacker injects scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=()

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  6. 6

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The public appearance of restricted paths can aid malicious users in probing the site.

    Fix: Implement proper access controls beyond robots.txt for sensitive paths.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 151 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 151 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 151 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 151 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.beautyrewind.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.beautyrewind.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.