Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-09-20-0112

www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 9/20/2026, 1:12:29 AM

Scan 2026-09-20-0112

Scanned 9/20/2026, 1:12:29 AM, finished 9/20/2026, 1:30:40 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 20, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 160 pages and 907 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 14 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (143), meta descriptions (59), title tags (58); 7 checks passed. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
160
Assets fetched
907
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 14
  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 148 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Meta descriptions59 issues
    59 of 148 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 148 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Redirects8 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 148 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1954 image references have no alt attribute. 1154 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets143 issues
    100 assets larger than 500 KB among the 100 heaviest.
  • Orphan pages25 issues
    25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage32 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 145 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 148 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1115 sites, median 82%, average 80%

www.beautyrewind.ca scores 85%, higher than 62% of the 1115 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

028560%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 1 site37%: 0 sites38%: 0 sites39%: 0 sites40%: 0 sites41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 0 sites45%: 2 sites46%: 1 site47%: 1 site48%: 0 sites49%: 0 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 1 site53%: 1 site54%: 2 sites55%: 1 site56%: 2 sites57%: 3 sites58%: 7 sites59%: 3 sites60%: 5 sites61%: 8 sites62%: 12 sites63%: 4 sites64%: 9 sites65%: 9 sites66%: 8 sites67%: 15 sites68%: 28 sites69%: 13 sites70%: 24 sites71%: 22 sites72%: 25 sites73%: 24 sites74%: 32 sites75%: 26 sites76%: 39 sites77%: 37 sites78%: 35 sites79%: 33 sites80%: 43 sites81%: 54 sites82%: 51 sites83%: 46 sites84%: 55 sites85%: 49 sites86%: 46 sites87%: 47 sites88%: 56 sites89%: 39 sites90%: 52 sites91%: 39 sites92%: 24 sites93%: 17 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 8 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 4 sites98%: 3 sites99%: 1 site100%: 12 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has a good health score but needs to address critical issues with redirects, title tags, and meta descriptions. Start with the high-impact fixes first.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects may cause confusion for users and search engines, impacting rankings.

    How: Replace the current 10 redirects with direct links to their final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 13 URLs are returning errors, which can harm your SEO and user experience.

    How: Update 13 URLs to ensure they return a 200 status, or remove them if not needed.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 58 pages have title issues affecting search visibility.

    How: Update titles to be more descriptive and between 30-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 59 pages have meta description issues that can lower click-through rates.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be concise and within 150-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Structure

    Why: 3 pages have multiple H1 tags, causing SEO issues.

    How: Modify headings to ensure only one H1 per page with appropriate H2/H3 tags.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: 25 pages lack internal links, making them hard to find for users and search engines.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to the orphaned pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities that could expose users to risks. Key issues include the absence of HTTP Strict Transport Security and Clickjacking protection, which can lead to session hijacking and malicious framing attacks. Additionally, missing headers like Referrer-Policy and Permissions-Policy could compromise user data privacy.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, a visitor can be intercepted during the first request if they don't type the full HTTPS address.

    Fix: Implement HSTS by adding the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows the site to be embedded in a frame, increasing the risk of clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or use CSP frame-ancestors directive.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    No Referrer-Policy HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this policy, sensitive URL information can be leaked to other sites.

    Fix: Implement this header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from another domain without SRI exposes your site to potential attacks if that domain is compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) or use Content-Security-Policy to specify trusted domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Not using this header could allow unused browser features, increasing the risk of exploitation.

    Fix: Add the header: Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=(), geolocation=(self)

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Publicly listing sensitive paths could lead attackers to probe for vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Ensure that access controls are in place for the listed paths rather than relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 151 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 151 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 151 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 151 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.beautyrewind.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its public pages. Anyone can run a scan of any site they own or are authorised to check. Is this your site? Claim it to manage the listing, or ask for removal through the support form.

www.beautyrewind.ca scan 2026-09-20-0112 | DIY SEO Hub