Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-09-19-1610

www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 9/19/2026, 4:10:06 PM

Scan 2026-09-19-1610

Scanned 9/19/2026, 4:10:06 PM, finished 9/19/2026, 4:54:32 PM. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

85/ 100Good

On September 19, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 160 pages and 907 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 85 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 14 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (143), meta descriptions (59), title tags (58); 7 checks passed. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
160
Assets fetched
907
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 14
  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 148 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Meta descriptions59 issues
    59 of 148 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 148 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Redirects8 issues
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 148 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1954 image references have no alt attribute. 1154 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets143 issues
    100 assets larger than 500 KB among the 100 heaviest.
  • Orphan pages25 issues
    25 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage32 issues
    9 sitemaps listing 145 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 23 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 148 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1107 sites, median 82%, average 80%

www.beautyrewind.ca scores 85%, higher than 62% of the 1107 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

029570%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 1 site36%: 1 site37%: 0 sites38%: 0 sites39%: 0 sites40%: 0 sites41%: 0 sites42%: 0 sites43%: 0 sites44%: 0 sites45%: 2 sites46%: 1 site47%: 1 site48%: 0 sites49%: 0 sites50%: 3 sites51%: 4 sites52%: 1 site53%: 1 site54%: 2 sites55%: 1 site56%: 2 sites57%: 3 sites58%: 6 sites59%: 3 sites60%: 5 sites61%: 8 sites62%: 12 sites63%: 5 sites64%: 9 sites65%: 9 sites66%: 9 sites67%: 15 sites68%: 28 sites69%: 12 sites70%: 24 sites71%: 21 sites72%: 24 sites73%: 24 sites74%: 31 sites75%: 26 sites76%: 40 sites77%: 36 sites78%: 35 sites79%: 33 sites80%: 43 sites81%: 55 sites82%: 49 sites83%: 46 sites84%: 55 sites85%: 48 sites86%: 45 sites87%: 49 sites88%: 57 sites89%: 38 sites90%: 52 sites91%: 38 sites92%: 24 sites93%: 17 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 7 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 4 sites98%: 3 sites99%: 1 site100%: 10 sites85% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Several issues require attention for better SEO performance, including redirects, non-200 response codes, title and meta description problems, and orphan pages. Addressing these will enhance user experience and search engine visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Improve user experience and SEO by eliminating unnecessary redirects.

    How: Update URLs to point directly to the final destination without redirecting.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages that do not return a 2xx status hinder crawling and indexing.

    How: Identify broken links or unwanted redirects and ensure they lead to functional pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Correct titles enhance relevance and click-through rates (CTRs).

    How: Revise titles to be 50-60 characters, focusing on primary keywords.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: Effective descriptions improve rankings and CTR.

    How: Update descriptions to be around 150-160 characters, accurately summarizing page content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Heading Structure

    Why: Improving headings helps with readability and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has only one H1, with appropriate H2s for sections.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Linking pages allows search engines to index them and improves usability.

    How: Add internal links from relevant pages to orphan pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review of beautyrewind.ca reveals multiple issues including lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security, insufficient clickjacking protection, and absence of referrer-policy. Addressing these vulnerabilities can prevent attacks and enhance user privacy.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 2 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of HSTS allows interception of connections if users type the address without https://.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=63072000; includeSubDomains; preload'.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    No Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, pages can be framed by malicious sites, resulting in clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: 'X-Frame-Options: DENY'.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Absence of Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Not having a referrer-policy exposes users' full URLs when navigating away from the site.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer'.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  4. 4

    Lack of Subresource Integrity for Third-Party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Using external scripts without SRI increases risk if those scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies allowed hosts or use SRI for scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Not using permissions-policy can leave browser features exposed to malicious scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: 'Permissions-Policy: all=(none)'.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file discloses private paths which could be monitored by an attacker.

    Fix: Limit access to sensitive paths with proper authentication and authorization controls.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 151 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 151 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 151 pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 151 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its public pages. Anyone can run a scan of any site they own or are authorised to check. Is this your site? Claim it to manage the listing, or ask for removal through the support form.

www.beautyrewind.ca scan 2026-09-19-1610 | DIY SEO Hub