Scanned sites / www.beautyrewind.ca / 2026-09-16-0053
www.beautyrewind.ca scan from 9/16/2026, 12:53:29 AM
Scan 2026-09-16-0053
Scanned 9/16/2026, 12:53:29 AM, finished 9/16/2026, 1:21:55 AM. Found with openstreetmap overpass
Site: https://www.beautyrewind.ca/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 16, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 155 pages and 897 assets of www.beautyrewind.ca, starting from https://www.beautyrewind.ca/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 14 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (133), meta descriptions (54), title tags (53); 7 checks passed. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Medium2 medium, 2 low and 2 info findings. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 155
- Assets fetched
- 897
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 7 of 14
- Title tags53 issues53 of 143 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Meta descriptions54 issues54 of 143 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Headings3 issues3 of 143 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- Redirects8 issues10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responsesOK13 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- IndexabilityOK0 of 143 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design.
- Image alt textOK0 of 1909 image references have no alt attribute. 1119 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
- Heavy assets133 issues100 assets larger than 500 KB among the 100 heaviest.
- Orphan pages20 issues20 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverage27 issues9 sitemaps listing 140 URLs: 6 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 18 reachable only via the sitemap.
- Thin contentOK0 of 143 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
1039 sites, median 82%, average 80%
www.beautyrewind.ca scores 86%, higher than 66% of the 1039 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsSeveral issues were identified that can improve your site's SEO. Focus on fixing redirects, optimizing titles and meta descriptions, resolving heading issues, and addressing orphan pages for better performance.
- 1
Fix Redirects
Why: Reduce user frustration and improve crawl efficiency.
How: Update or remove unnecessary redirects to direct URLs to their final pages without redirection.
Checks: redirects
- 2
Resolve Non-200 Responses
Why: Ensure all pages return a valid response for better search engine crawling.
How: Identify and correct or remove non-200 status pages, ensuring all return a 200 status.
Checks: status-codes
- 3
Optimize Title Tags
Why: Improved titles enhance click-through rates and SEO.
How: Revise titles to be concise, ideally between 30-60 characters, avoiding both overly short and excessively long titles.
Checks: titles
- 4
Improve Meta Descriptions
Why: Effective meta descriptions can increase search visibility and click-through rates.
How: Shorten descriptions to under 160 characters, providing a clear overview of the page content.
Checks: meta-descriptions
- 5
Fix Heading Issues
Why: Proper heading structure improves readability and SEO.
How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag and utilize H2-H6 appropriately for subsections.
Checks: headings
- 6
Link Orphan Pages
Why: Connecting orphan pages enhances their visibility and crawlability.
How: Add internal links to orphan pages from relevant existing content to improve their discoverability.
Checks: orphan-pages
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website lacks important security headers that protect users from various attacks and data exposure. Implementing recommended headers can significantly improve security. Prioritize adding HSTS and X-Frame-Options to safeguard user data and prevent clickjacking.
- 0 high
- 2 medium
- 2 low
- 2 info
- 1
Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium
Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted if they access the site using HTTP instead of HTTPS.
Fix: Add the header: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload`.
Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security
- 2
Missing X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium
Why it matters: Lack of this header allows the site to be embedded in iframes, making it susceptible to clickjacking attacks.
Fix: Include the header: `X-Frame-Options: DENY` or use a Content Security Policy with `frame-ancestors 'none'`.
Evidence: Clickjacking protection
- 3
Missing Referrer PolicyLow
Why it matters: Not having a referrer policy can expose the full URL of the pages your visitors navigate from.
Fix: Set the header: `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer`.
Evidence: Referrer policy
- 4
Use of Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow
Why it matters: Potential compromise of scripts can introduce vulnerabilities or change site behavior.
Fix: Use SRI where possible, or implement a Content Security Policy that restricts loading from untrusted domains.
Evidence: Third-party scripts
- 5
Missing Permissions PolicyInfo
Why it matters: Without this policy, features like camera and microphone access are not controlled, posing potential risks.
Fix: Add the header: `Permissions-Policy: interest-cohort=()`. Adjust based on needs.
Evidence: Permissions policy
- 6
Sensitive Paths Listed in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: Publicly listing sensitive paths does not restrict access and may aid malicious probing.
Fix: Consider removing sensitive paths or implementing authentication measures to protect them.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium
No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no strict-transport-security
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no strict-transport-security
- FoundClickjacking protectionMedium
2 of 146 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no x-frame-options
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no x-frame-options
- FoundReferrer policyLow
No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no referrer-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no referrer-policy
- FoundPermissions policyInfo
No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/about/patient-financing/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/skincare/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/skinmedica/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/vivier/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/product-tag/zo-skin-health/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/under-eye-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/cosmetic-injectable-fillers/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/dermal-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lip-fillers-edmonton/ → no permissions-policy
- https://www.beautyrewind.ca/our-services/for-the-face/lash-enhancement-treatment/ → no permissions-policy
- NoteThird-party scripts
Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)
- static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
All 146 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.
- OKContent Security Policy
A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 146 pages.
- OKMIME sniffing protection
x-content-type-options is set on all 146 HTML pages.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKMixed content
No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.
- OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries
2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- Not applicableForms over HTTPS
No forms were found on the sampled pages.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.beautyrewind.ca from its public pages. Anyone can run a scan of any site they own or are authorised to check. Is this your site? Claim it to manage the listing, or ask for removal through the support form.