Scanned sites / www.azbuslaw.com / 2026-09-14-1500

www.azbuslaw.com scan from 2026-09-14 15:00:01 UTC DR 11

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-1500

Scanned 2026-09-14 15:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 15:21:28 UTC. Found on page 3 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-llc/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

66/ 100Needs work

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 691 pages and 343 assets of www.azbuslaw.com, starting from https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-llc/. It scored 66 out of 100, a result that needs work. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (581), title tags (416), indexability (412); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.8), title tags (−6.1), indexability (−6). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
691
Assets fetched
343
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,034 of 1,191 discovered URLs were fetched, 156 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 168 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags416 issues
    416 of 671 pages have title issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.1 points
  • Meta descriptions581 issues
    581 of 671 pages have meta description issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.8 points
  • Headings166 issues
    166 of 671 pages have heading issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites10 issues
    10 destinations answered with an error, 65 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 164 destinations checked.
    −0.6 points
  • Redirects7 issues
    7 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses7 noted
    7 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 7 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability412 issues
    412 of 684 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −6 points
  • Image alt text2,540 issues
    2540 of 4673 image references have no alt attribute. 1380 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −3.3 points
  • Heavy assets49 issues
    49 assets larger than 500 KB among 343 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage418 issues
    1 sitemap listing 253 URLs: 418 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.7 points
  • Internal link counts500 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 500 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 671 pages have fewer than 200 words. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format36 noted
    36 of 691 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals416 noted
    416 of 684 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives684 noted
    684 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text152 noted
    152 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure596 noted
    596 of 671 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length93 noted
    93 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 684 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 1034 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 684 pages; 368 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 62 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

www.azbuslaw.com scores 66%, higher than 10% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites66% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The website has several critical SEO issues that need fixing. Focus on resolving redirects, 404 errors, and optimizing titles, meta descriptions, and headings to improve performance and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can create unnecessary barriers for users and search engines.

    How: Update or remove conflicting redirects leading to dead ends or consolidate where necessary.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Pages returning non-200 responses are not accessible, affecting user navigation and SEO.

    How: Identify and correct the 7 URLs causing issues to return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Poorly optimized titles can impact search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters, ensuring they accurately describe the pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions influence search result appearance and can enhance CTR.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to be under 160 characters and more compelling.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing Headings (H1)

    Why: Missing H1s can hinder page structure and SEO performance.

    How: Add unique H1 tags to pages lacking them to improve content hierarchy.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Expand Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Not all pages are indexed, which can reduce visibility in search engines.

    How: Update the sitemap to include all crawled pages, ensuring it's submitted to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security issues, including missing security headers and outdated JavaScript libraries. Implementing recommended headers and updating libraries can greatly enhance security against common attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the URL directly can be vulnerable to interception.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows unauthorized script execution, exposing to XSS attacks.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header permits clickjacking attacks by allowing the site to be framed.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Using libraries with known vulnerabilities can expose the site to attacks.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: The API key can be abused if not restricted properly, leading to potential misuse.

    Fix: Restrict the Google API key by HTTP referrer in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-llc/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/firm-overview/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/donald-hudspeth/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/staff-profiles/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-starting-business/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/reasons-to-start-your-own-business/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/phoenix-small-business/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/phoenix-organizational-engineering/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-corporations/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 684 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-llc/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/firm-overview/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/donald-hudspeth/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/staff-profiles/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-starting-business/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/reasons-to-start-your-own-business/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/phoenix-small-business/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/phoenix-organizational-engineering/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-corporations/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-llc/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/firm-overview/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/donald-hudspeth/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/staff-profiles/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-starting-business/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/reasons-to-start-your-own-business/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/phoenix-small-business/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/phoenix-organizational-engineering/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-corporations/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-llc/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/firm-overview/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/donald-hudspeth/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/attorneys/staff-profiles/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-starting-business/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/reasons-to-start-your-own-business/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/phoenix-small-business/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/phoenix-organizational-engineering/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-corporations/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    3 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.12.3, jQuery 1.11.1, jQuery 2.6.8. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.12.3 in https://www.azbuslaw.com/aop/arizona-llc/: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 1.11.1 in https://www.azbuslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/admin/jquery.min.js?ver=1.11.1: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 2.6.8 in https://www.azbuslaw.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…gg (39 chars) in https://www.azbuslaw.com/wp-content/themes/projectx20/zones/zone_5/a/js/footer_…: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • translate.google.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
5 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 684 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    159 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.azbuslaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.azbuslaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.azbuslaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.azbuslaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.