Scanned sites / www.arpis.com / 2026-09-10-1128

www.arpis.com scan from 2026-09-10 11:28:05 UTC DR 28

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for www.arpis.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-1128

Scanned 2026-09-10 11:28:05 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 21:36:39 UTC

Site: https://www.arpis.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

74/ 100Needs work

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 3168 pages and 798 assets of www.arpis.com, starting from https://www.arpis.com/. It scored 74 out of 100, a result that needs work. 13 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (2,028), heavy assets (20), broken links (582); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.9), heavy assets (−6), broken links (−4.9). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
3168
Assets fetched
798
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

3,966 of 3,973 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 234 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags366 issues
    366 of 2098 pages have title issues. 261 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.6 points
  • Meta descriptions2,028 issues
    2028 of 2098 pages have meta description issues. 261 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.9 points
  • Headings84 issues
    84 of 2098 pages have heading issues. 261 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken links582 issues
    1224 internal links point at 582 broken URLs.
    −4.9 points
  • Links to other sites23 issues
    23 destinations answered with an error, 149 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 211 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects164 issues
    166 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses582 issues
    754 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 747 of them are pages, 582 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −2.5 points
  • Rate limited62 issues
    62 URLs (62 pages) answered HTTP 429 on every try, so the crawler backed off and moved on without analysing them. A site that throttles crawlers this hard can throttle search engines too.
    −0.1 points
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 2354 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 5 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 27321 image references have no alt attribute. 11144 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets20 issues
    20 assets larger than 500 KB among 798 fetched assets. 74 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages75 issues
    75 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage276 issues
    15 sitemaps listing 1944 URLs: 195 crawled pages missing, 4 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 75 reachable only via the sitemap. 35 listed URLs not crawled within the 5000-page budget.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link counts328 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 328 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 2098 pages have fewer than 200 words. 261 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content578 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −2 points
  • URL format349 noted
    349 of 3168 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals259 noted
    259 of 2359 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2,359 noted
    2359 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text927 noted
    927 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1,934 noted
    1934 of 2098 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 261 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length65 noted
    37 images over 100 KB; 28 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies153 noted
    153 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 2359 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 3966 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2359 pages; 2279 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2316 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.arpis.com scores 74%, higher than 29% of the 2316 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites74% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several critical issues. Prioritize fixing broken links and non-200 responses as they can significantly impact user experience and SEO. Other key improvements include updating title tags, meta descriptions, and addressing orphan pages.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Eliminating 1389 broken links will enhance user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify the sources of broken links and update or remove them from your site.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 816 URLs not returning 200 status can lead to poor user experience.

    How: Investigate and correct pages returning non-200 responses.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 366 pages have title issues, affecting click-through rates.

    How: Revise title tags to be unique and under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Over 2000 pages have meta description issues, impacting SEO.

    How: Add or revise meta descriptions for clarity and relevance.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: 75 orphan pages lack internal links, limiting visibility.

    How: Create internal links to relevant orphan pages from the existing content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

  6. 6

    Simplify Redirects

    Why: 166 redirecting URLs may dilute link equity.

    How: Consolidate or remove unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: redirects

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities related to missing security headers and outdated JavaScript libraries. Key improvements include implementing HTTP Strict Transport Security and X-Frame-Options, as well as updating vulnerable jQuery versions. Addressing these issues will help enhance your site's protection against attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the site URL without HTTPS could be intercepted on their first request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows your pages to be embedded in frames, making them susceptible to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Outdated jQuery LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: The site uses outdated jQuery versions with known vulnerabilities, potentially allowing exploitation based on their usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to mitigate known vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this header may lead browsers to execute files as scripts, exposing users to risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 2359 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/condo-ac/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.arpis.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/homeowners/vip-savings/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/my-account/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/book-online/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/new/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/furnace/cleaning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/new/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.arpis.com/air-conditioner/maintenance/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.5.21, jQuery 3.1.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.5.21 in https://www.arpis.com/wp-content/plugins/search-filter-pro/public/assets/js/cho…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 3.1.1 in https://www.arpis.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.mi…: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 7 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn-dfhgl.nitrocdn.com (1435 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • embed.scheduler.servicetitan.com (4 script tags)
    • sdk.amazonaws.com (2 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (2 script tags)
    • avoca.ai (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2359 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 2359 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    5 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.arpis.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.arpis.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.arpis.com?