Scanned sites / www.alabamabrick.com / 2026-09-12-2123

www.alabamabrick.com scan from 2026-09-12 21:23:29 UTC DR 11

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-2123

Scanned 2026-09-12 21:23:29 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 22:59:33 UTC. Found on page 1 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact-us

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 246 pages and 897 assets of www.alabamabrick.com, starting from https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact-us. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (200), heavy assets (265), indexability (44); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.6), heavy assets (−6), indexability (−1.8). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium, 4 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
246
Assets fetched
897
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,143 of 1,175 discovered URLs were fetched, 30 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 28 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags36 issues
    36 of 201 pages have title issues. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.5 points
  • Meta descriptions200 issues
    200 of 201 pages have meta description issues. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.6 points
  • Headings27 issues
    27 of 201 pages have heading issues. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.7 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites487 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 3 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 19 destinations checked.
  • Redirects3 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses6 noted
    6 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability44 issues
    44 of 243 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −1.8 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 4867 image references have no alt attribute. 752 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets265 issues
    265 assets larger than 500 KB among 897 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages48 issues
    48 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.8 points
  • Sitemap coverage49 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 240 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 48 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −1.2 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 243 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin content2 issues
    2 of 201 pages have fewer than 200 words. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 246 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals42 noted
    42 of 243 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 243 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure169 noted
    169 of 201 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 42 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length640 noted
    640 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 8 response headers recorded across 1143 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 243 pages; 203 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 57 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%

www.alabamabrick.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several key improvements are needed for your site to boost SEO performance, focusing primarily on redirects, page titles, meta descriptions, headings, and indexability issues. Addressing these will enhance visibility and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Resolve 3 redirects to improve user experience and link equity.

    How: Update internal links to point directly to the final URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Correct 6 URLs that return errors to ensure accessibility.

    How: Check the affected URLs and update their content or remove them if necessary.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Fix 34 title issues for better click-through rates and relevance.

    How: Ensure all titles are unique, concise, and properly formatted (30-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Address 200 issues to enhance search visibility and engagement.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for each page, limited to 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Heading Issues

    Why: Fix 27 heading problems for proper content structure and SEO benefits.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 tag; use H2 for subheadings.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Resolve Indexability Warnings

    Why: Address issues on 44 pages to enhance overall site's SEO performance.

    How: Check canonical tags and ensure no unnecessary noindex directives are present.

    Checks: indexability

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security vulnerabilities, including missing protections against transport security, script loading, and clickjacking. Addressing these issues is crucial to enhance the site's safety against attacks. Prioritize implementing these fixes immediately.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 4 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, attackers can intercept the first request when users do not enter 'https://'.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows potentially malicious scripts and styles to load from anywhere.

    Fix: Add a header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: No protection against being embedded in frames, which can lead to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Using Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.11.0 has multiple known vulnerabilities that can be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might execute files with incorrect MIME types.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Server Information DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing server version can aid attackers in targeting specific vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Hide server details by configuring your web server to not include the 'Server' header.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  7. 7

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Loading resources over HTTP on HTTPS pages compromises the security.

    Fix: Update all resource URLs to use HTTPS.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  8. 8

    Lack of Subresource Integrity for Third-party ScriptsLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from third-party domains can be compromised, impacting site security.

    Fix: Consider adding Subresource Integrity (SRI) attributes to script tags where applicable. Additionally, implement a Content Security Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  9. 9

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The listed path could potentially expose sensitive content to attackers.

    Fix: Implement proper access controls instead of relying on robots.txt for protection.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact-us → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/locations → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/build-better-with-brick → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/why-brick → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/cost-calculator → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/product-gallery/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/thin-brick → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/retaining-wall-block → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/stone → no strict-transport-security
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/fireplaces → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 243 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact-us → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/locations → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/build-better-with-brick → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/why-brick → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/cost-calculator → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/product-gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/thin-brick → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/retaining-wall-block → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/stone → no content-security-policy
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/fireplaces → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact-us → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/locations → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/build-better-with-brick → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/why-brick → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/cost-calculator → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/product-gallery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/thin-brick → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/retaining-wall-block → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/stone → no x-frame-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/fireplaces → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact-us → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/locations → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/build-better-with-brick → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/why-brick → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/cost-calculator → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/product-gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/thin-brick → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/retaining-wall-block → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/stone → no x-content-type-options
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/fireplaces → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0 (1143 responses)
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    243 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact-us loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/locations loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/contact loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/ loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/build-better-with-brick loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/why-brick loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/cost-calculator loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/product-gallery/ loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/thin-brick loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/retaining-wall-block loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/stone loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
    • https://www.alabamabrick.com/fireplaces loads image http://www.alabamabrick.com/img/alabama-brick-share.png
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.11.0. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.11.0 in https://www.alabamabrick.com/admin/assets/js/vendor/jquery-1.11.0.min.js: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (62 script tags)
    • www.google.com (1 script tag)
    • player.vimeo.com (8 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /admin/*
4 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 243 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    96 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near www.alabamabrick.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling www.alabamabrick.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own www.alabamabrick.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming www.alabamabrick.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.