Scanned sites / workwith.com / 2026-09-11-1201

workwith.com scan from 2026-09-11 12:01:24 UTC DR 2

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1201

Scanned 2026-09-11 12:01:24 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 12:02:44 UTC

Site: https://workwith.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

69/ 100Needs work

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 44 pages and 114 assets of workwith.com, starting from https://workwith.com/. It scored 69 out of 100, a result that needs work. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (44), meta descriptions (44), thin content (26); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), meta descriptions (−8), thin content (−4.7). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
44
Assets fetched
114
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

158 of 158 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 14 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags44 issues
    44 of 44 pages have title issues.
    −10 points
  • Meta descriptions44 issues
    44 of 44 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 44 pages have heading issues.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 10 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 14 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects10 noted
    10 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses11 noted
    11 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 44 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text137 issues
    137 of 183 image references have no alt attribute.
    −4.5 points
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 114 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage22 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://workwith.com/sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 44 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content26 issues
    26 of 44 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −4.7 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 44 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 44 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives44 noted
    44 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text16 noted
    16 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure43 noted
    43 of 44 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length4 noted
    4 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 44 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 10 response headers recorded across 158 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 44 pages; 21 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 76 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

workwith.com scores 69%, higher than 14% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites69% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has multiple SEO issues affecting visibility. Prioritize fixing non-200 responses, missing title tags, meta descriptions, and alt text for images. Creating a sitemap will also enhance crawlability.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: Improving non-200 responses enhances user experience and search engine visibility.

    How: Redirect or update the URLs to return a 200 status. Check redirect links and ensure content is accessible.

    Checks: status-codes, redirects

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Titles over 60 characters are cut off in search results, hurting click-through rates.

    How: Edit title tags to under 60 characters. Include primary keywords while maintaining clarity.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions help improve click-through rates by summarizing page content.

    How: Create unique descriptions (150-160 characters) for each page, incorporating target keywords.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Implement Image Alt Text

    Why: Alt text helps improve accessibility and can aid in image search rankings.

    How: Add descriptive alt text for each image that succinctly describes its content.

    Checks: images-alt

  5. 5

    Create a Sitemap

    Why: A sitemap improves site structure visibility to search engines.

    How: Generate a sitemap and save it as /sitemap.xml. List it in your robots.txt file.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Enhance Thin Content

    Why: Thorough content increases engagement and can boost rankings.

    How: Add 150+ words of high-quality, relevant information to each thin content page.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site workwith.com has several security vulnerabilities that need addressing. Key issues include the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security, a Content Security Policy, and X-Frame-Options headers, alongside mixed content errors. Users might be at risk of interception and clickjacking. Immediate action is recommended to enhance overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on initial requests to the site.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of a CSP allows unauthorized sources to load scripts and content, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Not using X-Frame-Options increases vulnerability to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or SAMEORIGIN

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Mixed Content IssuesMedium

    Why it matters: Resources loaded over HTTP can be manipulated, compromising data integrity.

    Fix: Change HTTP resource URLs to HTTPS across the site.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret file types and execute scripts inappropriately.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from unverified sources can compromise site integrity if affected.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy that defines safe code sources or use Subresource Integrity where applicable.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://workwith.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/ryan-m-beaudoin → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/gary-d-brajcich → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/nicholas-c-briggs → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/thomas-tj-burford → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/robert-j-burnett → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/jon-t-burtard → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/megan-l-cain → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/steven-j-dixson → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/mark-a-ellingsen → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/jeffrey-r-galloway → no strict-transport-security
    • https://workwith.com/lawrence-w-garvin → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 44 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://workwith.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/ryan-m-beaudoin → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/gary-d-brajcich → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/nicholas-c-briggs → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/thomas-tj-burford → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/robert-j-burnett → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/jon-t-burtard → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/megan-l-cain → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/steven-j-dixson → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/mark-a-ellingsen → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/jeffrey-r-galloway → no content-security-policy
    • https://workwith.com/lawrence-w-garvin → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://workwith.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/ryan-m-beaudoin → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/gary-d-brajcich → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/nicholas-c-briggs → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/thomas-tj-burford → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/robert-j-burnett → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/jon-t-burtard → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/megan-l-cain → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/steven-j-dixson → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/mark-a-ellingsen → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/jeffrey-r-galloway → no x-frame-options
    • https://workwith.com/lawrence-w-garvin → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://workwith.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/ryan-m-beaudoin → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/gary-d-brajcich → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/nicholas-c-briggs → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/thomas-tj-burford → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/robert-j-burnett → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/jon-t-burtard → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/megan-l-cain → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/steven-j-dixson → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/mark-a-ellingsen → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/jeffrey-r-galloway → no x-content-type-options
    • https://workwith.com/lawrence-w-garvin → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundMixed contentMedium

    46 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP, 44 of them scripts or stylesheets that browsers block or that can be tampered with in transit.

    • https://workwith.com/ loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/ loads image http://workwith.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/logo_large.png
    • https://workwith.com/ryan-m-beaudoin loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/gary-d-brajcich loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/nicholas-c-briggs loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/thomas-tj-burford loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/robert-j-burnett loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/jon-t-burtard loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/megan-l-cain loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/steven-j-dixson loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/mark-a-ellingsen loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
    • https://workwith.com/jeffrey-r-galloway loads stylesheet http://fonts.googleapis.com/css?family=Lato
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • maps.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
    • www.avvo.com (3 script tags)
    • www.superlawyers.com (1 script tag)
6 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 44 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near workwith.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling workwith.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own workwith.com?