Scanned sites / withinthewild.com

SEO report for withinthewild.com DR 43

The latest Site Spider scan of withinthewild.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/withinthewild-com/2026-09-13-0700.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 07:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 11:12:20 UTC. Found on page 1 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://withinthewild.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

77/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 163 pages and 840 assets of withinthewild.com, starting from https://withinthewild.com/. It scored 77 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (26), meta descriptions (78), broken links (30); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5), broken links (−4.8). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
163
Assets fetched
840
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

1,003 of 1,004 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 42 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags24 issues
    24 of 93 pages have title issues. 33 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Meta descriptions78 issues
    78 of 93 pages have meta description issues. 33 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • Headings16 issues
    16 of 93 pages have heading issues. 33 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Broken links30 issues
    222 internal links point at 30 broken URLs.
    −4.8 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 29 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 40 destinations checked.
    −0.6 points
  • Redirects7 issues
    8 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses30 issues
    58 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 37 of them are pages, 30 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −2.4 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability4 issues
    4 of 97 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 29 pages noindex by design.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 942 image references have no alt attribute. 898 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets26 issues
    26 assets larger than 500 KB among 840 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages11 issues
    11 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage11 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 97 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 11 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.5 points
  • Internal link counts30 noted
    Internal link counts for 126 pages; 30 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 93 pages have fewer than 200 words. 33 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format38 noted
    38 of 163 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals33 noted
    33 of 126 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives126 noted
    126 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text19 noted
    19 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure60 noted
    60 of 93 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 33 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length37 noted
    37 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 126 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 1003 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 126 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 55 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2337 sites, median 79%, average 78%

withinthewild.com scores 77%, higher than 38% of the 2337 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites77% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues detected that may affect user experience and SEO. Key improvements involve fixing broken links, addressing non-200 responses, and enhancing page titles and meta descriptions for better search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 222 internal links are broken, detracting from user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify and update or remove links pointing to broken pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 58 URLs return errors, affecting site usability and indexing.

    How: Redirect or fix URLs that do not return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Correct Title Tag Issues

    Why: 24 titles need improvement for SEO and clarity.

    How: Ensure titles are unique, relevant, and within optimal length (30-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 74 pages have meta description issues, reducing search result click-through rates.

    How: Write unique and engaging meta descriptions (70-160 characters) for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Resolve Heading Issues

    Why: 16 pages have heading problems that can confuse search engines and users.

    How: Ensure each page has a single H1 and relevant subheadings.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: 11 orphan pages lack internal links, limiting their visibility.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security issues that need immediate attention, including missing protections against clickjacking, content type sniffing, and a lack of a Content Security Policy. Additionally, a vulnerable version of jQuery is in use. Addressing these concerns will help enhance the site's security significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to XSS attacks as it allows scripts from any source.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header. Example: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, the site is susceptible to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add an X-Frame-Options header. Example: `X-Frame-Options: DENY`.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Vulnerable Version of jQueryMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.4.1 exposes the site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to mitigate reported vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Absence of this header increases the risk of MIME sniffing, allowing browsers to misinterpret content types.

    Fix: Add an X-Content-Type-Options header. Example: `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Without SRI, third-party scripts can be altered, affecting the site's security.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for third-party scripts or create a CSP that limits allowed external sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Path Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The /wp-admin/ path is publicly listed, which could reveal sensitive areas to potential attackers.

    Fix: Consider securing sensitive paths with proper authentication instead of relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 126 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://withinthewild.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/bethewild/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/lodges/tutka-bay-lodge/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/experience/adventures-activities/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/experience/sample-trip-itineraries/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/danish-daughter-flower-farm/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/alaska-beyond/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/cuisine/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://withinthewild.com/cuisine_old/the-dining-experience/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://withinthewild.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/bethewild/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/lodges/tutka-bay-lodge/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/experience/adventures-activities/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/gallery/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/experience/sample-trip-itineraries/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/danish-daughter-flower-farm/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/alaska-beyond/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/cuisine/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/cuisine_old/the-dining-experience/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://withinthewild.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/bethewild/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/lodges/tutka-bay-lodge/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/experience/adventures-activities/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/gallery/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/experience/sample-trip-itineraries/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/danish-daughter-flower-farm/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/alaska-beyond/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/cuisine/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://withinthewild.com/cuisine_old/the-dining-experience/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.4.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.4.1 in https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/3.4.1/jquery.min.js: CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • storage.googleapis.com (80 script tags)
    • ajax.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 126 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 126 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    42 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of withinthewild.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near withinthewild.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling withinthewild.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own withinthewild.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming withinthewild.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.