Scanned sites / winnipegdentistry.com

SEO report for winnipegdentistry.com DR 12

The latest Site Spider scan of winnipegdentistry.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/winnipegdentistry-com/2026-09-12-1232.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 12:32:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 13:36:51 UTC

Site: https://winnipegdentistry.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 86 pages and 192 assets of winnipegdentistry.com, starting from https://winnipegdentistry.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (58), heavy assets (22), meta descriptions (44); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.8), heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.1). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
86
Assets fetched
192
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

278 of 279 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 90 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags58 issues
    58 of 85 pages have title issues.
    −6.8 points
  • Meta descriptions44 issues
    44 of 85 pages have meta description issues.
    −4.1 points
  • Headings5 issues
    5 of 85 pages have heading issues.
    −0.4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 52 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 90 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 85 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 85 image references have no alt attribute. 84 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets22 issues
    22 assets larger than 500 KB among 192 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.2 points
  • Sitemap coverage9 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 80 URLs: 5 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.6 points
  • Internal link counts5 noted
    Internal link counts for 85 pages; 5 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 85 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format6 noted
    6 of 86 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 85 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives85 noted
    85 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text8 noted
    8 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure30 noted
    30 of 85 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length6 noted
    6 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 85 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 278 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 85 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights3 noted
    Mobile performance 87 on average across 5 pages; 3 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

winnipegdentistry.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several issues requiring attention, particularly with title tags and meta descriptions. Prioritize fixing these for improved SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects are creating unnecessary overhead for visitors and crawlers.

    How: Remove or update the two URLs that are currently redirecting.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can hinder user experience and indexing.

    How: Ensure the two URLs return a 200 OK status instead of a redirect.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Correct title tags improve click-through rates and rankings.

    How: Revise 57 titles to be unique and under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: Clear meta descriptions enhance search result visibility.

    How: Update 23 meta descriptions to be unique and between 70-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: Headings structure content better, aiding both SEO and user readability.

    How: Add H1 tags to the 5 pages that are currently missing them.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Internal links ensure all pages are discoverable and indexed.

    How: Add links to 4 orphan pages from relevant pages on your site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several important security vulnerabilities, including missing protections against common attacks. Implementing recommended security headers will bolster defenses against potential exploits. Pay particular attention to strict transport security and content security policy.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors using HTTP can be intercepted before the secure connection is established.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows scripts to load from potentially malicious sources.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this protection, your site could be embedded in an iframe and exploited for clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might misinterpret file types and execute unsafe content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Without SRI, third-party scripts can be changed by attackers, posing risks.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity for scripts whenever possible, or implement a CSP.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt exposes paths that look private, which could lead to exploration by attackers.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/signup/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/botox/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/childrens-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/cleaning-checkups/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/implants/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/dentures/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/emergency-dental/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/restorative-dentistry/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 85 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/signup/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/botox/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/childrens-dentistry/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/cleaning-checkups/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/implants/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/dentures/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/emergency-dental/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/restorative-dentistry/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/signup/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/botox/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/childrens-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/cleaning-checkups/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/implants/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/dentures/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/emergency-dental/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/restorative-dentistry/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/signup/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/botox/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/childrens-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/cleaning-checkups/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/cosmetic-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/implants/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/dentures/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/emergency-dental/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://winnipegdentistry.com/services/restorative-dentistry/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (1 script tag)
    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 85 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of winnipegdentistry.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near winnipegdentistry.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling winnipegdentistry.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own winnipegdentistry.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming winnipegdentistry.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.