Scanned sites / whitefrogcafe.com / 2026-11-01-0136

whitefrogcafe.com scan from 2026-11-01 01:36:26 UTC DR 8

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-01-0136

Scanned 2026-11-01 01:36:26 UTC, finished 2026-11-01 01:38:51 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://whitefrogcafe.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

80/ 100Good

On November 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 9 pages and 199 assets of whitefrogcafe.com, starting from https://whitefrogcafe.com/. It scored 80 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (5), title tags (4), indexability (2); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−5), meta descriptions (−5), indexability (−2.5). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
9
Assets fetched
199
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

208 of 209 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags4 issues
    4 of 5 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • Meta descriptions5 issues
    5 of 5 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 5 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects2 noted
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 5 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design. 2 noindex pages are listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore them.
    −2.5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 80 image references have no alt attribute. 19 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 199 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages2 issues
    2 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1 points
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 8 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.3 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 8 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 5 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 9 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 8 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives8 noted
    8 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 5 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    2 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validation1 noted
    1 of 8 pages have HTML problems: 0 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    8 of 5 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (8), ListItem (8), WebSite (8), Organization (8), WebPage (8). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 5 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 8 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions1 noted
    1 of 5 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 208 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 8 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling6 noted
    6 words an English dictionary does not know, on 4 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2367 sites, median 79%, average 78%

whitefrogcafe.com scores 80%, higher than 50% of the 2367 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 71 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 93 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 89 sites80%: 110 sites81%: 107 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 104 sites84%: 109 sites85%: 90 sites86%: 72 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 38 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 13 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites80% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has some issues affecting SEO, including title and meta description problems, redirects, and indexability warnings. Addressing these can improve visibility and performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions are critical for CTR and SEO visibility.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for all pages, ensuring they summarize content and include keywords.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improved titles can boost ranking and click-through rates.

    How: Revise title tags to be unique, descriptive, and under 60 characters for each page.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Redirects can hinder performance and SEO.

    How: Ensure URLs redirect properly without unnecessary redirects (e.g., fix the checkout redirect to the cart).

    Checks: redirects

  4. 4

    Address Indexability Issues

    Why: Noindex pages in the sitemap confuse search engines, potentially limiting visibility.

    How: Remove noindex pages from the sitemap to align with intended SEO strategy.

    Checks: indexability, sitemap-coverage

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Headings improve content structure and SEO.

    How: Add an H1 heading to the homepage to align with best practices.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow down pages and affect user experience.

    How: Reduce the file size of identified heavy assets, moving them if needed (e.g. PDFs, images).

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks critical security headers, exposing it to potential interception and clickjacking attacks. Implementing these headers will enhance the site's security posture significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted on their first request if they type the address without https://.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of this header allows pages to be embedded in frames on other sites, making them vulnerable to clickjacking.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or use a Content-Security-Policy with frame-ancestors.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files based on content type instead of declared type, risking cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Not setting a referrer policy exposes the full page address to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    Fix: Add the header: Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  5. 5

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can compromise site security if they are modified by attackers.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or use a Content-Security-Policy to restrict sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing /wp-admin/ in robots.txt may inform attackers about sensitive paths that are not properly protected.

    Fix: Consider removing or restricting access to sensitive paths instead of listing them in robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/products/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/purchase-a-tree/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/cart/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/my-account/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/my-account/lost-password/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 8 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/products/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/purchase-a-tree/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/cart/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/products/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/purchase-a-tree/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/cart/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/my-account/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/my-account/lost-password/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/products/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/purchase-a-tree/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/about-us/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/contact-us/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/cart/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/my-account/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://whitefrogcafe.com/my-account/lost-password/ → no referrer-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • fd.cleantalk.org (8 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 8 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 8 pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 8 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near whitefrogcafe.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling whitefrogcafe.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own whitefrogcafe.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming whitefrogcafe.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.