Scanned sites / webpagetest.org / 2026-09-16-0348
webpagetest.org scan from 9/16/2026, 3:48:42 AM
Scan 2026-09-16-0348
Scanned 9/16/2026, 3:48:42 AM, finished 9/16/2026, 3:49:27 AM. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory
Site: https://webpagetest.org/
Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.
On September 16, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 2 pages and 4 assets of webpagetest.org, starting from https://webpagetest.org/. It scored 90 out of 100, an excellent result. 1 of 14 checks found something to fix, led by non-200 responses (1); 13 checks passed. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.
Security review: Info1 info finding. See the security findings ↓
- Pages crawled
- 2
- Assets fetched
- 4
- Status
- Completed
- Checks with issues
- 1 of 14
- Title tagsOK0 of 0 pages have title issues.
- Meta descriptionsOK0 of 0 pages have meta description issues.
- HeadingsOK0 of 0 pages have heading issues.
- Broken linksOK0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
- RedirectsOK3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
- Non-200 responses1 issue5 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
- Rate limitedOKThe site did not rate limit the crawler.
- IndexabilityOK0 of 0 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
- Image alt textOK0 of 0 image references have no alt attribute.
- Heavy assetsOK0 assets larger than 500 KB among the 4 heaviest.
- Orphan pagesOK0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
- Sitemap coverageOKNo sitemap found. Tried: https://webpagetest.org/sitemap.xml (301), https://www.webpagetest.org/sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
- Thin contentOK0 of 0 pages have fewer than 200 words.
- Duplicate contentOK0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
Where this scan sits among all scanned sites
1059 sites, median 82%, average 80%
webpagetest.org scores 90%, higher than 83% of the 1059 scanned sites. See the full ranking.
Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).
Internal link map
Loading the link map...
Fix plan
Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findingsYour site has an excellent health score but needs immediate attention to redirects, non-200 responses, and missing sitemap. Addressing these will improve usability and SEO.
- 1
Fix Redirects
Why: Improve user experience and SEO by eliminating unnecessary redirects.
How: Redirect 'https://webpagetest.org/' and 'https://webpagetest.org/robots.txt' to their final targets directly.
Checks: redirects
- 2
Resolve Non-200 Responses
Why: Ensure all URLs return proper status codes for better accessibility.
How: Investigate and fix the URLs returning 403 and 404 statuses to ensure they are accessible.
Checks: status-codes
- 3
Create a Sitemap
Why: A sitemap helps search engines index your site efficiently.
How: Create a sitemap.xml file and place it at the root of your domain, then list it in robots.txt.
Checks: sitemap-coverage
Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.
Security review
Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawlThe website's robots.txt file contains disallowed paths that may expose sensitive information to unauthorized users. These paths need more robust access controls to prevent unauthorized access.
- 0 high
- 0 medium
- 0 low
- 1 info
- 1
Sensitive paths in robots.txtInfo
Why it matters: The robots.txt file lists private paths (e.g., /testlog/, /testlog.php) which may reveal sensitive information to users and bots.
Fix: Consider removing sensitive paths from robots.txt or implementing stronger access control measures to protect them.
Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt
What the checks found
- NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt
robots.txt lists 2 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.
- Disallow: /testlog/
- Disallow: /testlog.php
6 checks passed, 9 not applicable
- OKHTTPS
https://webpagetest.org/ redirects to HTTPS.
- OKSoftware version disclosure
The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.
- OKCookie flags
All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.
- OKKeys and secrets in page code
No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.
- OKExposed files and listings
None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.
- OKThird-party scripts
The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.
- Not applicableHTTP Strict Transport Security
No page was served over HTTPS, so this header does not apply yet.
- Not applicableContent Security Policy
No HTML page was fetched.
- Not applicableClickjacking protection
No HTML page was fetched.
- Not applicableMIME sniffing protection
No HTML page was fetched.
- Not applicableReferrer policy
No HTML page was fetched.
- Not applicablePermissions policy
No HTML page was fetched.
- Not applicableMixed content
No page was served over HTTPS, so mixed content does not apply yet.
- Not applicableForms over HTTPS
No forms were found on the sampled pages.
- Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries
No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.
A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.
This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling webpagetest.org from its public pages. Anyone can run a scan of any site they own or are authorised to check. Is this your site? Claim it to manage the listing, or ask for removal through the support form.