Scanned sites / warmanphysio.com / 2026-09-13-0232

warmanphysio.com scan from 2026-09-13 02:32:21 UTC DR 9

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0232

Scanned 2026-09-13 02:32:21 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 04:03:53 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://warmanphysio.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1020 pages and 1072 assets of warmanphysio.com, starting from https://warmanphysio.com/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (188), links to other sites (92), meta descriptions (372); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), links to other sites (−3.7), meta descriptions (−3). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1020
Assets fetched
1072
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

2,092 of 2,092 discovered URLs were fetched, 5,444 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 85 left unchecked.

  • Title tags208 issues
    208 of 414 pages have title issues. 579 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.1 points
  • Meta descriptions372 issues
    372 of 414 pages have meta description issues. 579 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3 points
  • Headings87 issues
    87 of 414 pages have heading issues. 579 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken links7 issues
    20 internal links point at 7 broken URLs.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites92 issues
    92 destinations answered with an error, 22 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 85 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −3.7 points
  • Redirects20 issues
    21 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses7 issues
    28 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 27 of them are pages, 7 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability24 issues
    24 of 476 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 517 pages noindex by design.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt text993 issues
    993 of 9335 image references have no alt attribute. 5997 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.6 points
  • Heavy assets188 issues
    188 assets larger than 500 KB among 1072 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage414 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 414 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.5 points
  • Internal link counts500 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 500 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 414 pages have fewer than 200 words. 579 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content7 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format524 noted
    524 of 1020 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals579 noted
    579 of 993 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives993 noted
    993 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text585 noted
    585 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure150 noted
    150 of 414 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 579 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length55 noted
    47 images over 100 KB; 8 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 993 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 2092 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 993 pages; 684 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 68 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2342 sites, median 79%, average 78%

warmanphysio.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2342 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues were found that can impact SEO performance, including broken links and title/meta description problems. Prioritize fixing broken links, improving title tags, and enhancing sitemap coverage for a better user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 20 internal links are broken, leading to 404 errors which harm user experience.

    How: Identify the broken links (URLs) and update or remove the links in your content accordingly.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 206 of 414 pages have title issues, which can lead to less optimization on search engines.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters and ensure they are unique for each page.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 364 pages have missing or problematic meta descriptions that can decrease click-through rates.

    How: Write clear, engaging meta descriptions for every page, staying under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 28 URLs returned non-200 responses, affecting site accessibility.

    How: Audit these URLs, fixing or redirecting them to valid pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  5. 5

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Sitemap currently lists 0 URLs which hinders SEO performance.

    How: Generate a new sitemap that includes all crawled pages and submit it to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Address Heavy Assets

    Why: 100 assets are over 500 KB, potentially slowing down the site.

    How: Optimize these images using compression tools or replace them with smaller files.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The analysis of warmanphysio.com identified several security concerns, including the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) and Content Security Policy (CSP), as well as exposed API keys. Addressing these issues will enhance the site's security against various types of attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, connections can be intercepted if visitors access the site using HTTP.

    Fix: Add the following header: `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload`.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of a CSP allows potentially harmful scripts and resources to be loaded from anywhere.

    Fix: Implement CSP by adding the following header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' www.google.com;`. Adjust as necessary.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Exposure of Google API Key in Page CodeMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can be used by malicious parties if not properly restricted.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console by limiting it to your site's domains and referrers.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from another domain without integrity checks can compromise site security.

    Fix: If possible, ensure scripts from www.google.com are served with Subresource Integrity or implement a robust Content Security Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Path Listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The `/wp-admin/` path is public, potentially revealing sensitive areas of your website.

    Fix: Consider implementing access controls to restrict access to sensitive paths instead of relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://warmanphysio.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/services-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/physiotherapy-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/massage-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/nutrition-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/services/motor-vehicle/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/services/workplace-injury/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/services/direct-billing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/counselling-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/about-us-2/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://warmanphysio.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 993 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://warmanphysio.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/services-2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/physiotherapy-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/massage-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/nutrition-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/services/motor-vehicle/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/services/workplace-injury/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/services/direct-billing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/counselling-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/about-us-2/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://warmanphysio.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…LE (39 chars) in https://warmanphysio.com/contact-us/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (2 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 993 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 993 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 993 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    69 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near warmanphysio.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling warmanphysio.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own warmanphysio.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming warmanphysio.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.