Scanned sites / visiononeboise.com / 2026-11-01-1236

visiononeboise.com scan from 2026-11-01 12:36:47 UTC DR 8

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-01-1236

Scanned 2026-11-01 12:36:47 UTC, finished 2026-11-01 12:40:01 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://visiononeboise.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

92/ 100Excellent

On November 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 84 pages and 66 assets of visiononeboise.com, starting from https://visiononeboise.com/. It scored 92 out of 100, an excellent result. 6 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (33), links to other sites (4), title tags (9); 14 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−3.8), links to other sites (−1.6), title tags (−1.3). 13 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
84
Assets fetched
66
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

150 of 150 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 183 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags9 issues
    9 of 53 pages have title issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.3 points
  • Meta descriptions33 issues
    33 of 53 pages have meta description issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 53 pages have heading issues. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 59 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 183 destinations checked.
    −1.6 points
  • Redirects14 issues
    14 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.8 points
  • Non-200 responses14 noted
    14 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 14 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability2 issues
    2 of 55 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 15 pages noindex by design.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 496 image references have no alt attribute. 237 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 66 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    1 sitemap listing 53 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts15 noted
    Internal link counts for 70 pages; 15 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 53 pages have fewer than 200 words. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 84 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals2 noted
    2 of 70 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives70 noted
    70 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure21 noted
    21 of 53 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 17 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length13 noted
    13 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies12 noted
    12 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation70 noted
    70 of 70 pages have HTML problems: 70 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured data69 noted
    70 of 53 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (70), ListItem (70), Organization (70), WebSite (70), Optometric (70). 69 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 53 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 70 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsOK
    0 of 53 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • Pagination6 noted
    40 pages in pagination sequences; 6 with problems.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 18 response headers recorded across 150 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 70 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling21 noted
    21 words an English dictionary does not know, on 26 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2499 sites, median 80%, average 78%

visiononeboise.com scores 92%, higher than 92% of the 2499 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591180%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 37 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 72 sites73%: 74 sites74%: 73 sites75%: 76 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 99 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 98 sites80%: 118 sites81%: 111 sites82%: 112 sites83%: 113 sites84%: 117 sites85%: 93 sites86%: 79 sites87%: 85 sites88%: 61 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 45 sites91%: 53 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites92% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website is in excellent health, but several improvements are needed for optimal performance and SEO. Focus on fixing redirect issues, correcting title tags, enhancing meta descriptions, and addressing indexability warnings.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Eliminating unnecessary redirects improves load times and user experience.

    How: Update the URLs to point directly to the final destination without redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Correct Title Tags

    Why: 9 title tags are too short, which can impact SEO and CTR.

    How: Update titles to be more descriptive and over 30 characters long.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 33 meta descriptions are problematic, potentially affecting click-through rates.

    How: Rewrite them to be unique, relevant, and within 160 characters to avoid cutoff.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Address Indexability Warnings

    Why: Resolving indexability issues ensures all relevant content is crawlable by search engines.

    How: Check the URLs with warnings and correct any canonical or robots.txt issues.

    Checks: indexability

  5. 5

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Reducing file sizes can enhance page load speed for better user experience.

    How: Compress images and stylesheets, or consider serving lighter versions.

    Evidence: 278 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 70 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    70 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security issues, including the absence of a Content Security Policy which leaves it vulnerable to various attacks. A vulnerable JavaScript library is also present. Additionally, the server reveals its version, which could help attackers exploit known vulnerabilities. Implementing recommended headers and upgrading libraries is essential for improved security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows scripts to be loaded from any source, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header to restrict sources. Example: "Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';"

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.9.1 has known vulnerabilities that could be exploited dependendo on use.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0 to mitigate risks associated with the vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Server Banner Reveals DetailsLow

    Why it matters: The server and framework version can be used by attackers to identify vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Remove or modify the Server and X-Powered-By headers to prevent version disclosure.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: No permissions policy means that unused browser features aren't disabled, potentially allowing injected scripts too much power.

    Fix: Add a Permissions-Policy header. Example: "Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(), camera=()".

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 70 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://visiononeboise.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/our-practice/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/adult-senior-eye-exams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/childrens-eye-exams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/contact-lens-exams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/optilight-by-lumenis/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/dry-eye-therapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/emergency-eye-care/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/eye-disease-diagnosis-management/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/laser-eye-surgery-consultation/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://visiononeboise.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/our-practice/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/blog/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/adult-senior-eye-exams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/childrens-eye-exams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/contact-lens-exams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/optilight-by-lumenis/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/dry-eye-therapy/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/emergency-eye-care/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/eye-disease-diagnosis-management/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://visiononeboise.com/service/laser-eye-surgery-consultation/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: cloudflare (150 responses)
    • x-powered-by: PHP/8.0.30, PleskLin (86 responses)
    • x-powered-by: PleskLin (64 responses)
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.9.1 in https://visiononeboise.com/wp-content/themes/understrap/js/theme.min.js?ver=2.7…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • data.staticfiles.io (40 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (17 script tags)
    • unpkg.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (17 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 70 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 70 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 70 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 70 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 70 HTML pages.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    20 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near visiononeboise.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling visiononeboise.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own visiononeboise.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming visiononeboise.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.