Scanned sites / village-vet.ca / 2026-09-19-0950

village-vet.ca scan from 2026-09-19 09:50:12 UTC DR 8

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-19-0950

Scanned 2026-09-19 09:50:12 UTC, finished 2026-09-19 11:06:34 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://village-vet.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

86/ 100Good

On September 19, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 27 pages and 508 assets of village-vet.ca, starting from https://village-vet.ca/. It scored 86 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (61), meta descriptions (12), title tags (9); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−3.6), title tags (−3.3). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
27
Assets fetched
508
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

535 of 537 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 35 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags9 issues
    9 of 26 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3.3 points
  • Meta descriptions12 issues
    12 of 26 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 26 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 24 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 35 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses11 noted
    11 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 26 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 251 image references have no alt attribute. 117 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets61 issues
    61 assets larger than 500 KB among 508 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage2 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 25 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.4 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 27 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content1 issue
    1 of 26 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 27 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 27 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives27 noted
    27 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text5 noted
    5 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure12 noted
    12 of 26 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length82 noted
    82 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 27 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 18 response headers recorded across 535 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 27 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 34 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

village-vet.ca scores 86%, higher than 73% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites86% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has a few issues that need addressing, mainly focusing on redirects, non-200 responses, title and meta description problems. Correcting these will enhance SEO and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Ensure that users and search engines reach the correct content without encountering issues.

    How: Update the sitemap.xml link to the correct URL without redirecting.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixing broken links will improve user experience and avoid penalties from search engines.

    How: Check the URLs for 404 errors and update or remove them accordingly.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Optimized titles enhance search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Revise the titles to under 60 characters while retaining keywords.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Effective meta descriptions improve search result attractiveness.

    How: Update missing and duplicate descriptions, ensuring each is unique and under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing H1 Tag

    Why: H1 tags are essential for SEO and content structure.

    How: Insert a relevant H1 tag on the blog/category page.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Ensure Internal Linking for Orphan Pages

    Why: Improves discoverability of the page and overall site structure.

    How: Create internal links to the orphan page from other relevant pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review for village-vet.ca identified missing security headers that could leave the site vulnerable. A Content Security Policy is essential for mitigating attacks involving unauthorized content. Additionally, not implementing a Referrer Policy may expose confidential URLs, while the presence of third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity increases the risk of disruption.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: No Content Security Policy restricts where scripts and styles can load from, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header like: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Absence of a Referrer Policy could expose sensitive URL information to external sites.

    Fix: Set a Referrer Policy header: `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade`.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  3. 3

    Software Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: The site reveals the use of WP Engine in the X-Powered-By header, potentially aiding attackers.

    Fix: Consider removing the `X-Powered-By` header entirely or hiding the version information.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Third-Party Scripts Without SRILow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity can be compromised, affecting the site.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity or use a Content Security Policy to restrict script sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Exposing paths like /wp-admin/ in robots.txt can guide attackers probing for vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths through proper server-side access control.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 27 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://village-vet.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/about-village-vet-animal-clinic/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/veterinarian-calgary-ab/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/village-vet-animal-clinic-gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/career-opportunities/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/clinic-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/calgary-ab-veterinary-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/pet-insurance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/teaching-hospital/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/contact/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://village-vet.ca/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/about-village-vet-animal-clinic/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/veterinarian-calgary-ab/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/faqs/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/village-vet-animal-clinic-gallery/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/career-opportunities/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/clinic-tour/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/calgary-ab-veterinary-services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/pet-insurance/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/teaching-hospital/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/blog/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://village-vet.ca/contact/ → no referrer-policy
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (535 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (32 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (27 script tags)
    • www.google.com (27 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
11 checks passed
  • OKHTTPS

    All 27 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 27 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 27 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 27 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 27 HTML pages.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    28 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near village-vet.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling village-vet.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own village-vet.ca?