Scanned sites / victoriavetclinic.ca

SEO report for victoriavetclinic.ca DR 5

The latest Site Spider scan of victoriavetclinic.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/victoriavetclinic-ca/2026-09-12-0752.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 07:52:39 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 10:03:01 UTC

Site: https://victoriavetclinic.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

90/ 100Excellent

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 47 pages and 399 assets of victoriavetclinic.ca, starting from https://victoriavetclinic.ca/. It scored 90 out of 100, an excellent result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (5), title tags (7), redirects (15); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−3), title tags (−2.2), redirects (−1.9). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
47
Assets fetched
399
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

446 of 446 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 37 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags7 issues
    7 of 31 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −2.2 points
  • Meta descriptions3 issues
    3 of 31 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 31 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 15 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 37 destinations checked.
    −0.8 points
  • Redirects15 issues
    16 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.9 points
  • Non-200 responses19 noted
    19 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 15 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 31 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 93 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets5 issues
    5 assets larger than 500 KB among 399 fetched assets. 23 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −3 points
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 30 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 32 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 31 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 47 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 32 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives32 noted
    32 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text8 noted
    8 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structureOK
    0 of 31 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length16 noted
    11 images over 100 KB; 5 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies14 noted
    14 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 32 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 446 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 32 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 51 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2473 sites, median 80%, average 78%

victoriavetclinic.ca scores 90%, higher than 88% of the 2473 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 6 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 36 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 73 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 72 sites74%: 71 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 98 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 96 sites80%: 117 sites81%: 110 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 112 sites84%: 114 sites85%: 93 sites86%: 75 sites87%: 81 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 44 sites91%: 52 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 27 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 13 sites96%: 14 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites90% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website is in great shape with a health score of 91/100. However, there are some priority fixes needed to improve SEO and user experience, including redirects, non-200 responses, and missing title tags.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Reduce unnecessary redirects to improve page load speed and user experience.

    How: Update URLs to direct users to the final destination without redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensure all pages return a 200 status for better user access and SEO.

    How: Identify and fix the URLs that return a non-200 status code.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improve title tags for better search visibility and click-through rates.

    How: Shorten titles to under 60 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Improve relevance and searching capability with engaging meta descriptions.

    How: Add missing meta descriptions and shorten long ones to under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Heading Issues

    Why: Headings improve readability and SEO performance.

    How: Add an H1 tag to the affected page.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Ensure all pages are discoverable and indexed by linking them internally.

    How: Create internal links to the orphan pages from relevant existing content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks a Content Security Policy, increasing the risk of unauthorized script execution. It also uses third-party scripts without Subresource Integrity, which can expose the site to vulnerabilities. Additionally, the robots.txt file reveals a private path, potentially making it easier for attackers to target sensitive areas.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and data injection attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header, e.g., `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts without Subresource Integrity allows potential compromise of those scripts to affect your site.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity (SRI) attributes on scripts or implement a Content Security Policy that restricts their origins.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The presence of '/wp-admin/' in robots.txt may expose sensitive areas to probing by attackers.

    Fix: Consider removing sensitive paths from robots.txt or restrict access through authentication measures.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 32 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/vet-care-team-regina-sk/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/veterinarians-regina-sk/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/clinic-tour/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/regina-sk-veterinary-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/pet-wellness-care-regina-sk/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/veterinary-diagnostics-regina-sk/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/pet-online-pharmacy-regina-sk/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/veterinary-dentistry-regina-sk/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/pet-surgery-regina-sk/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://victoriavetclinic.ca/pet-laser-therapy-regina-sk/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (32 script tags)
    • us.vetstoria.com (32 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 32 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 32 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 32 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 32 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    40 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of victoriavetclinic.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near victoriavetclinic.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling victoriavetclinic.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own victoriavetclinic.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming victoriavetclinic.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.