Scanned sites / vergeag.com / 2026-09-10-1633

vergeag.com scan from 2026-09-10 16:33:48 UTC DR 27

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-1633

Scanned 2026-09-10 16:33:48 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 19:12:08 UTC

Site: https://vergeag.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 686 pages and 509 assets of vergeag.com, starting from https://vergeag.com/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 10 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (501), heavy assets (121), title tags (332); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6), heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
686
Assets fetched
509
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

1,195 of 1,195 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 57 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags332 issues
    332 of 637 pages have title issues. 31 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5 points
  • Meta descriptions501 issues
    501 of 637 pages have meta description issues. 31 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6 points
  • Headings119 issues
    119 of 637 pages have heading issues. 31 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.1 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 15 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 52 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects18 issues
    18 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses18 noted
    18 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 18 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability14 issues
    14 of 650 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 18 pages noindex by design. 1 noindex page is listed in the sitemap, which asks search engines both to visit and to ignore it.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 4027 image references have no alt attribute. 2037 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets121 issues
    121 assets larger than 500 KB among 509 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages17 issues
    17 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage12 issues
    1 sitemap listing 628 URLs: 10 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.1 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content29 issues
    29 of 637 pages have fewer than 200 words. 31 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format30 noted
    30 of 686 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals30 noted
    30 of 668 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives18 noted
    18 pages carry a robots directive; 650 carry none.
  • Anchor text8 noted
    8 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure254 noted
    254 of 637 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 31 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length251 noted
    245 images over 100 KB; 6 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 668 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 1195 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 668 pages; 533 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2318 sites, median 79%, average 78%

vergeag.com scores 81%, higher than 55% of the 2318 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several key issues impact your site's SEO performance. Prioritize fixing redirects, non-200 responses, title and meta descriptions, and addressing thin content. These changes can significantly enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 18 URLs redirecting may confuse search engines and users.

    How: Update your internal links to point directly to the final URLs instead of the redirecting URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 18 URLs returning errors can negatively affect user experience and SEO.

    How: Check these URLs and ensure they return a 2xx status by fixing or removing faulty pages.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 330 pages with title issues can harm search rankings.

    How: Edit title tags to be unique, descriptive, and between 30 to 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 257 pages have meta description issues affecting CTR.

    How: Revise meta descriptions to summarize page content clearly, keeping them under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Thin Content

    Why: 29 pages with low word counts may not fulfill user intent.

    How: Expand content on these pages to provide more value, targeting 200+ words.

    Checks: thin-content

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: 17 orphan pages are inaccessible to users and search engines.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from related content to improve visibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website lacks critical security headers, which makes it vulnerable to various types of attacks. Implementing a Content Security Policy can significantly improve protection against cross-site scripting and other code injection attacks. Additionally, review the visibility of sensitive paths listed in the robots.txt file.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is exposed to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks by allowing scripts to load from any source.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from an external domain without Subresource Integrity means any compromise of that domain can affect your site’s functionality.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity where possible or restrict third-party scripts in a Content Security Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Path in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The path `/home-old/` is disclosed in robots.txt, which could highlight potentially sensitive areas of your application to attackers.

    Fix: Either remove or ensure proper access controls on the `/home-old/` path to protect it.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 668 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://vergeag.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/products/path-planner/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/products/path-planner/features/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/routing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/products/equipment-explorer/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/products/equipment-explorer/features/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/integrations/john-deere/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/integrations/trimble/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/integrations/cnh/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/developers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://vergeag.com/kb/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /home-old/
8 checks passed, 5 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 668 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 668 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 668 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 668 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near vergeag.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling vergeag.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own vergeag.com?