Scanned sites / uslawns.com

SEO report for uslawns.com DR 52

The latest Site Spider scan of uslawns.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/uslawns-com/2026-09-12-0847.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 08:47:33 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 15:36:03 UTC

Site: https://uslawns.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

71/ 100Needs work

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 713 pages and 1000 assets of uslawns.com, starting from https://uslawns.com/. It scored 71 out of 100, a result that needs work. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (447), meta descriptions (512), heavy assets (102); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−7.1), meta descriptions (−6.5), heavy assets (−6). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
713
Assets fetched
1000
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,713 of 1,714 discovered URLs were fetched, 879 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 250 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags447 issues
    447 of 618 pages have title issues. 16 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.1 points
  • Meta descriptions512 issues
    512 of 618 pages have meta description issues. 16 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.5 points
  • Headings206 issues
    206 of 618 pages have heading issues. 16 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Broken links5 issues
    14 internal links point at 5 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites8 issues
    8 destinations answered with an error, 117 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 250 destinations checked.
    −0.5 points
  • Redirects74 issues
    75 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.5 points
  • Non-200 responses5 issues
    80 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 79 of them are pages, 5 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability8 issues
    8 of 624 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 10 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt text1 issue
    1 of 1359 image references have no alt attribute. 657 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets102 issues
    102 assets larger than 500 KB among 1000 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages5 issues
    5 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage618 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 618 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.8 points
  • Internal link counts400 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 400 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 618 pages have fewer than 200 words. 16 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content5 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format7 noted
    7 of 713 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals13 noted
    13 of 634 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives634 noted
    634 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text413 noted
    413 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure285 noted
    285 of 618 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 16 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length111 noted
    109 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies26 noted
    26 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 634 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 13 response headers recorded across 1713 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 634 pages; 577 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 57 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%

uslawns.com scores 71%, higher than 20% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 117 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites71% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several issues needing attention, particularly broken links, redirects, and title/meta description problems. Addressing these will enhance the site's user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 14 internal links lead to 404 errors, which affect user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove links that lead to broken pages listed in the findings.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Clean Up Redirects

    Why: 75 redirects can slow down site performance; one is chained.

    How: Simplify or eliminate unnecessary redirects by mapping old URLs to new ones directly.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 445 pages have title issues, impacting search visibility.

    How: Create unique, relevant titles for each page that are 50-60 characters long.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 216 pages have missing meta descriptions, which can hurt click-through rates.

    How: Draft concise, engaging meta descriptions for the affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 80 URLs are returning non-200 responses, negatively affecting SEO.

    How: Identify and either fix or remove URLs that return errors.

    Checks: status-codes

  6. 6

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: 206 pages have heading issues that can confuse search engines and users.

    How: Ensure each page has a single, clear H1 tag and properly structured headings.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security issues, including missing critical headers and using outdated libraries. Addressing these issues will enhance security and protect user data. Prioritize implementing missing headers and updating vulnerable libraries.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted on their first request without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows any scripts to load, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Set a CSP header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Outdated jQuery Libraries with VulnerabilitiesMedium

    Why it matters: Using old library versions can expose your site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least version 3.5.0.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  4. 4

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can be abused if not properly restricted.

    Fix: Restrict this API key in the Google Cloud console and by HTTP referrers.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, a browser may misinterpret content types, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://uslawns.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/who-we-are/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/mission-and-vision/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/our-history/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/resource-library/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/retail/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/hospitality/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/industrial/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 634 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://uslawns.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/who-we-are/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/mission-and-vision/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/our-history/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/resource-library/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/retail/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/hospitality/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/industrial/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://uslawns.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/who-we-are/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/mission-and-vision/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/about-us/our-history/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/resource-library/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/retail/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/hospitality/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://uslawns.com/customers/industrial/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.7.0, jQuery 2.10.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.7.0 in https://uslawns.com/wp-content/themes/salient/js/build/third-party/hoverintent.…: CVE-2012-6708 (selector XSS), CVE-2015-9251, CVE-2019-11358, CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023; fixed in 3.5.0
    • jQuery 2.10.5 in https://uslawns.com/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery.min.…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…z0 (39 chars) in https://uslawns.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (12 script tags)
    • www.google.com (6 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 634 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 634 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    120 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of uslawns.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near uslawns.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling uslawns.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own uslawns.com?