Scanned sites / treasurevalleylandscape.com

SEO report for treasurevalleylandscape.com DR 9

The latest Site Spider scan of treasurevalleylandscape.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/treasurevalleylandscape-com/2026-09-12-1822.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-12 18:22:20 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 19:24:53 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

67/ 100Needs work

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 31 pages and 355 assets of treasurevalleylandscape.com, starting from https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/. It scored 67 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (40), meta descriptions (19), sitemap coverage (24); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.2), sitemap coverage (−5). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
31
Assets fetched
355
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

386 of 387 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 52 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags10 issues
    10 of 29 pages have title issues.
    −3.4 points
  • Meta descriptions19 issues
    19 of 29 pages have meta description issues.
    −5.2 points
  • Headings10 issues
    10 of 29 pages have heading issues.
    −2.1 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    30 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −1.4 points
  • Links to other sites9 issues
    9 destinations answered with an error, 19 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 52 destinations checked.
    −3.6 points
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    9 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 29 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text29 issues
    29 of 170 image references have no alt attribute.
    −1 points
  • Heavy assets40 issues
    40 assets larger than 500 KB among 355 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages8 issues
    8 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage24 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 13 URLs: 16 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 8 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 29 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content9 issues
    9 of 29 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −2.5 points
  • Duplicate content2 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.6 points
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 31 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 29 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives29 noted
    29 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure8 noted
    8 of 29 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length48 noted
    46 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 29 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 386 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 29 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 90 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2440 sites, median 80%, average 78%

treasurevalleylandscape.com scores 67%, higher than 12% of the 2440 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 9 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 28 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 36 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 71 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 72 sites74%: 69 sites75%: 75 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 95 sites78%: 112 sites79%: 93 sites80%: 116 sites81%: 110 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 111 sites84%: 111 sites85%: 93 sites86%: 73 sites87%: 77 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 70 sites90%: 41 sites91%: 51 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 25 sites94%: 20 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 13 sites97%: 14 sites98%: 6 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites67% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The crawl revealed several issues affecting SEO performance. Addressing broken links, non-200 responses, title and meta description issues, along with adding alt text and improving thin content will greatly improve site health.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 30 internal links point to broken URLs, harming user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove links pointing to 404 pages like /?page_id=67.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 9 URLs need to return a valid response to improve site functionality.

    How: Redirect or fix broken URLs, particularly those returning 404 errors.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 10 pages have title issues which can hinder search engine visibility.

    How: Optimize titles to be unique and under 60 characters, e.g., update the title for the blog pages.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 12 pages lack or have issues with meta descriptions that impact click-through rates.

    How: Include unique and relevant meta descriptions for each page, focusing on main keywords.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Image Alt Text

    Why: 29 out of 170 images lack alt attributes, affecting accessibility and SEO.

    How: Add descriptive alt text to images across the site.

    Checks: images-alt

  6. 6

    Increase Content on Thin Pages

    Why: 9 pages have fewer than 200 words, which could lead to lower rankings.

    How: Add relevant content to these pages to enhance their value.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security vulnerabilities related to response headers and exposed credentials. Addressing these issues will enhance the protection against potential attacks and misuse. Key areas of concern include missing security headers and an exposed Google API key that should be restricted.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted on their first request if they type your address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header `Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains` to all responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, your site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks as scripts can load from any source.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header like `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` to restrict content sources.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your site can be embedded in an iframe on malicious sites, exposing users to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add `X-Frame-Options: DENY` to your HTTP headers to prevent framing.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can lead to unauthorized use of your API quota and malicious activities.

    Fix: Restrict the API key in the Google Cloud console by setting HTTP referrer restrictions.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header can lead to content being misinterpreted by the browser, increasing vulnerability to attacks.

    Fix: Include `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` in your server response headers.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-maintenance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-design-and-installation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/tree-care-service/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/snow-and-ice-management/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/irrigation-sprinkler-system-water-features/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-enhancements/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/reviews/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 29 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-maintenance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-design-and-installation/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/tree-care-service/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/snow-and-ice-management/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/irrigation-sprinkler-system-water-features/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-enhancements/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-maintenance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-design-and-installation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/tree-care-service/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/snow-and-ice-management/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/irrigation-sprinkler-system-water-features/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-enhancements/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/reviews/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-maintenance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-design-and-installation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/tree-care-service/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/snow-and-ice-management/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/irrigation-sprinkler-system-water-features/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/landscape-enhancements/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/reviews/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…Oc (39 chars) in https://treasurevalleylandscape.com/contact-us/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • onsite.optimonk.com (29 script tags)
    • unpkg.com (29 script tags)
    • kit.fontawesome.com (29 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 29 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    53 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of treasurevalleylandscape.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near treasurevalleylandscape.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling treasurevalleylandscape.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own treasurevalleylandscape.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming treasurevalleylandscape.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.