Scanned sites / tophouseroofing.com

SEO report for tophouseroofing.com DR 6

The latest Site Spider scan of tophouseroofing.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/tophouseroofing-com/2026-09-13-0637.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 06:37:20 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 07:44:41 UTC. Found on page 4 of brave web search results

Site: https://tophouseroofing.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 14 pages and 148 assets of tophouseroofing.com, starting from https://tophouseroofing.com/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (7), heavy assets (7), title tags (2); 15 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−4.3), heavy assets (−4.2), title tags (−1.5). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
14
Assets fetched
148
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

162 of 162 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 10 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags2 issues
    2 of 13 pages have title issues.
    −1.5 points
  • Meta descriptions7 issues
    7 of 13 pages have meta description issues.
    −4.3 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 13 pages have heading issues.
    −1.4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 10 destinations checked.
    −1.2 points
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses7 noted
    7 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 13 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 13 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets7 issues
    7 assets larger than 500 KB among 148 fetched assets.
    −4.2 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    4 sitemaps listing 13 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 13 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 13 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 14 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 13 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives13 noted
    13 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 13 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 13 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 162 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 13 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 59 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2687 sites, median 80%, average 78%

tophouseroofing.com scores 87%, higher than 79% of the 2687 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0621240%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 40 sites68%: 38 sites69%: 49 sites70%: 47 sites71%: 76 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 77 sites75%: 86 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 107 sites78%: 122 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 123 sites81%: 120 sites82%: 122 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 124 sites85%: 102 sites86%: 90 sites87%: 91 sites88%: 76 sites89%: 73 sites90%: 51 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 23 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site's health is excellent, but there are a few optimizations to enhance SEO. Focus on fixing redirects, addressing non-200 responses, revising title tags and meta descriptions, correcting heading issues, and optimizing heavy assets.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can affect user experience and SEO.

    How: Update URLs to remove unnecessary redirects: sitemap.xml to sitemap_index.xml.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 404 errors can harm user experience and SEO rankings.

    How: Fix or remove links to broken assets: font files returning 404.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Optimized title tags enhance click-through rates and SEO.

    How: Update Blog title to exceed 30 characters. Reduce length of 'Importance of Cleaning' to under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Missing descriptions can lower click-through rates from SERPs.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Multiple H1 Tags

    Why: Multiple H1s confuse search engines and affect rankings.

    How: Standardize to a single H1 per page: Privacy Policy, Best Shingle, and Cleaning Up pages.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large files can slow down site speed, impacting user engagement.

    How: Compress images over 500KB and consider lazy loading.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review identified several important issues on your website that need addressing. Key areas of concern include missing security headers such as HSTS, Content Security Policy, and Clickjacking protection, along with an exposed Google API key. Implementing these changes will enhance your website's security against various vulnerabilities.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users are vulnerable to interception when accessing the site without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of resources, increasing exposure to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Include a header 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'' to define where resources can be loaded from.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows the site to be embedded in frames, which can lead to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to prevent other sites from framing your pages.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: An exposed API key can be misused if not restricted properly, leading to unauthorized usage.

    Fix: Restrict the API key's usage in the Google Cloud console by setting HTTP referrer restrictions.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without this protection, browsers may run files incorrectly due to their contents rather than declared types.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains are vulnerable to manipulation unless properly controlled.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or use a restrictive Content Security Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://tophouseroofing.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-roof-replacements/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-metal-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/luxury-lifetime-products/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-roof-repairs-inspections/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/our-process/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/the-best-shingle-for-lethbridge-wind/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/the-importance-of-cleaning-up-after-a-job/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 13 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://tophouseroofing.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-roof-replacements/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-metal-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/luxury-lifetime-products/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-roof-repairs-inspections/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/our-process/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/the-best-shingle-for-lethbridge-wind/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/the-importance-of-cleaning-up-after-a-job/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://tophouseroofing.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-roof-replacements/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-metal-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/luxury-lifetime-products/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-roof-repairs-inspections/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/our-process/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/the-best-shingle-for-lethbridge-wind/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/the-importance-of-cleaning-up-after-a-job/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://tophouseroofing.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-roof-replacements/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-metal-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/luxury-lifetime-products/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/lethbridge-roof-repairs-inspections/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/our-process/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/the-best-shingle-for-lethbridge-wind/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://tophouseroofing.com/the-importance-of-cleaning-up-after-a-job/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…t8 (39 chars) in https://tophouseroofing.com/contact/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (13 script tags)
    • cdn.callrail.com (13 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 13 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    17 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of tophouseroofing.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near tophouseroofing.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling tophouseroofing.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own tophouseroofing.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming tophouseroofing.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.