Scanned sites / talcoelectric.com / 2026-09-14-0012

talcoelectric.com scan from 2026-09-14 00:12:55 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-0012

Scanned 2026-09-14 00:12:55 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 00:23:23 UTC. Found on page 5 of brave web search results

Site: https://talcoelectric.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

69/ 100Needs work

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 85 pages and 167 assets of talcoelectric.com, starting from https://talcoelectric.com/. It scored 69 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by thin content (11), sitemap coverage (65), heavy assets (8); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to thin content (−6.3), sitemap coverage (−6), heavy assets (−4.8). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
85
Assets fetched
167
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

252 of 252 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 4 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags5 issues
    5 of 13 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Meta descriptions8 issues
    8 of 13 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −4.6 points
  • Headings7 issues
    7 of 13 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites15 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 4 destinations checked.
  • Redirects8 issues
    71 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −2.3 points
  • Non-200 responses71 noted
    71 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 71 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 13 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 0 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets8 issues
    8 assets larger than 500 KB among 167 fetched assets. 1 document over that size is listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −4.8 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage65 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 77 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 64 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −6 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 14 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin content11 issues
    11 of 13 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.3 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format13 noted
    13 of 85 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 14 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives14 noted
    14 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure6 noted
    6 of 13 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies6 noted
    6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 14 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 252 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 14 pages; 1 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights3 noted
    Mobile performance 91 on average across 5 pages; 3 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

talcoelectric.com scores 69%, higher than 14% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites69% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site requires several critical fixes including resolving redirect issues, improving meta tags, and addressing thin content. Addressing these issues will enhance SEO performance and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 71 pages have redirect issues, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Update links and remove unnecessary redirects to point directly to valid pages.

    Checks: redirects, status-codes

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 71 URLs do not return 2xx status, negatively affecting site accessibility.

    How: Identify and fix links leading to non-200 pages, ensuring they return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 5 of 13 pages have title issues affecting click-through rates.

    How: Create unique and concise title tags under 60 characters for duplicate titles.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 5 of 13 pages have meta description issues that could harm visibility.

    How: Update meta descriptions to be between 50-160 characters, accurately describing page content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: 7 pages are missing H1 tags, which are crucial for SEO.

    How: Add a relevant H1 tag to each page that accurately reflects the content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Expand Thin Content

    Why: 11 pages have fewer than 200 words, limiting their SEO potential.

    How: Add quality content to each page to provide more value to users and meet word count criteria.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website lacks several important security measures that protect visitors and data. Implementing the recommended headers will enhance overall security and mitigate risks. Prioritize adding these protections to your site.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the site URL may be intercepted during their first request if they don’t use HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content-Security-Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, browsers can load scripts and styles from any source, increasing the risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without clickjacking protection, your pages can be embedded in frames on other sites, risking user interactions.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: The absence of this header allows browsers to interpret files as scripts based on their contents, potentially executing malicious code.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Using scripts from another domain without Subresource Integrity could compromise your site if that domain is attacked.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that defines allowed script sources and consider using Subresource Integrity.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Your robots.txt reveals a path that may be sensitive, which could be exploited.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls are implemented rather than relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://talcoelectric.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/residential/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/commercial/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/design-build/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/energy-solutions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/portfolio/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/contact-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/thanks-a-lot-for-the-added-protection/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/2012/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/absolutely-amazing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/i-would-recommend-talco-to-anyone-who/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 14 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://talcoelectric.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/residential/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/commercial/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/design-build/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/energy-solutions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/portfolio/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/contact-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/thanks-a-lot-for-the-added-protection/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/2012/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/absolutely-amazing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/i-would-recommend-talco-to-anyone-who/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://talcoelectric.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/residential/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/commercial/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/design-build/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/energy-solutions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/portfolio/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/contact-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/thanks-a-lot-for-the-added-protection/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/2012/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/absolutely-amazing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/i-would-recommend-talco-to-anyone-who/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://talcoelectric.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/residential/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/commercial/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/design-build/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/energy-solutions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/portfolio/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/contact-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/thanks-a-lot-for-the-added-protection/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/2012/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/absolutely-amazing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://talcoelectric.com/testimonial/i-would-recommend-talco-to-anyone-who/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • stats.wp.com (14 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 14 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near talcoelectric.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling talcoelectric.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own talcoelectric.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming talcoelectric.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.