Scanned sites / swiftgrid.net / 2026-09-11-1739

swiftgrid.net scan from 2026-09-11 17:39:38 UTC DR 37

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for swiftgrid.net.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-11-1739

Scanned 2026-09-11 17:39:38 UTC, finished 2026-09-11 17:47:20 UTC

Site: https://swiftgrid.net/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

89/ 100Good

On September 11, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 103 pages and 38 assets of swiftgrid.net, starting from https://swiftgrid.net/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by redirects (69), meta descriptions (12), title tags (9); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to redirects (−4), meta descriptions (−2.8), title tags (−2.6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
103
Assets fetched
38
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

141 of 141 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 11 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags9 issues
    9 of 21 pages have title issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.6 points
  • Meta descriptions12 issues
    12 of 21 pages have meta description issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.8 points
  • Headings1 issue
    1 of 21 pages have heading issues. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.2 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesOK
    0 destinations answered with an error, of 11 destinations checked.
  • Redirects69 issues
    69 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −4 points
  • Non-200 responses70 noted
    70 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 69 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 34 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 119 image references have no alt attribute. 44 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 38 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    1 sitemap listing 21 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.2 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 34 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 21 pages have fewer than 200 words. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format81 noted
    81 of 103 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals13 noted
    13 of 34 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 34 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure9 noted
    9 of 21 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 13 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length3 noted
    3 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 34 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 141 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 34 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights4 noted
    Mobile performance 92 on average across 5 pages; 4 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2326 sites, median 79%, average 78%

swiftgrid.net scores 89%, higher than 86% of the 2326 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 106 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 76 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 63 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 23 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites89% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

You have several SEO issues to fix. Focus on redirects, Non-200 responses, title tags, and meta descriptions for the most impact. Address these to improve your site’s performance and visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix 301 Redirects

    Why: 69 URLs are redirecting unnecessarily, which affects crawling.

    How: Update the internal links to point to the final destination URL to eliminate redirects.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 70 URLs returned non-200 responses, hindering accessibility.

    How: Identify and correct pages returning 301/303; ensure they return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 9 pages have titles longer than 60 characters, which can hurt ranking.

    How: Revise exceed length titles to be concise and descriptive under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 5 pages have meta descriptions longer than 160 characters, potentially impacting click-through rates.

    How: Shorten long meta descriptions to be under 160 characters and engaging.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Correct Heading Structure

    Why: 1 page has multiple H1s which can confuse search engines.

    How: Ensure only one H1 tag is used per page, using H2s for subheadings.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Fix Sitemap Issues

    Why: Your sitemap lists a URL that redirects, preventing proper indexing.

    How: Update the sitemap to include the correct URLs without redirects.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website swiftgrid.net lacks essential security features that could protect against various vulnerabilities. Most notably, a Content Security Policy (CSP) is missing, which increases the risk of cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, and the server version disclosure could aid attackers in exploiting known vulnerabilities. Immediate actions are recommended to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to XSS attacks as it does not restrict where content can load from.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy header such as 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to mitigate script injection risks.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: The server's version is exposed, making it easier for attackers to target known vulnerabilities related to that version.

    Fix: Hide version information by modifying the server configuration to use 'ServerTokens Prod' in Apache or similar settings based on the server software.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file lists a private path, which can be used by attackers to identify sensitive parts of the site.

    Fix: Restrict access to sensitive paths with proper authentication and remove them from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 34 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://swiftgrid.net/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/contact → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/canadian-managed-web-hosting/business-solutions/custom-fast-secure-easy → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/canadian-managed-web-hosting/business-solutions/open-source-wordpress-email-database → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/canadian-managed-web-hosting/agency-solutions/marketing-design-support → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/canadian-managed-web-hosting/agency-solutions/it-development-support → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/canadian-managed-web-hosting → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/canadian-managed-web-hosting/enterprise-solutions → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/about → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/resources/faq-where-is-data-hosted → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/resources/faq-migrate-from-another-host → no content-security-policy
    • https://swiftgrid.net/resources/faq-white-label-agency-hosting → no content-security-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache/2.4.58 (Ubuntu) (141 responses)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /includes/
9 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 34 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 34 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 34 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 34 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    14 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near swiftgrid.net

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling swiftgrid.net from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own swiftgrid.net?