Scanned sites / submi.io / 2026-11-04-1232

submi.io scan from 2026-11-04 12:32:30 UTC DR 30

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-04-1232

Scanned 2026-11-04 12:32:30 UTC, finished 2026-11-04 12:41:07 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://submi.io/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

89/ 100Good

On November 4, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 32 pages and 61 assets of submi.io, starting from https://submi.io/. It scored 89 out of 100, a good result. 4 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (18), links to other sites (9), meta descriptions (7); 19 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−5.6), links to other sites (−3.6), meta descriptions (−1.8). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 4 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
32
Assets fetched
61
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
4 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

93 of 93 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 2750 left unchecked.

  • Title tags18 issues
    18 of 29 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.6 points
  • Meta descriptions7 issues
    7 of 29 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.8 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 29 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites9 issues
    9 destinations answered with an error, 34 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 2750 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −3.6 points
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responsesOK
    0 URLs did not return a 2xx response.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 30 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 4778 image references have no alt attribute. 167 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 61 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    1 sitemap listing 30 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts32 noted
    Internal link counts for 32 pages; 32 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 29 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 32 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 32 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives2 noted
    2 pages carry a robots directive; 30 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure9 noted
    9 of 29 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    2 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validation1 noted
    1 of 32 pages have HTML problems: 1 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    32 of 29 indexable pages carry structured data: Organization (32), WebSite (32), Article (1), ListItem (1), FAQPage (1). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 29 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 32 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions4 noted
    4 of 29 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 93 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 32 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling44 noted
    44 words an English dictionary does not know, on 13 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2850 sites, median 80%, average 79%

submi.io scores 89%, higher than 83% of the 2850 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0741470%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 80 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 130 sites79%: 113 sites80%: 125 sites81%: 123 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 129 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 54 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 147 sites89% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has a high health score with some title and meta description issues. Resolve these for better SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Title Tag Issues

    Why: 18 pages have title tag issues affecting search visibility.

    How: Revise titles to be between 30-60 characters. Ensure they accurately describe each page's content.

    Checks: titles

  2. 2

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 7 pages have long or short meta descriptions that may affect click-through rates.

    How: Update descriptions to be between 70-160 characters and relevant to the page content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  3. 3

    Resolve Canonical Issue

    Why: One page has a canonical tag pointing incorrectly, which may confuse search engines.

    How: Change the canonical URL to the correct page (if it should not point to the homepage).

    Checks: indexability

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your site lacks several important security headers, which can expose you to various vulnerabilities such as clickjacking and script injection. Implementing these headers will significantly improve your site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 4 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, scripts and resources can be loaded from any source, leading to potential unauthorized data access or manipulation.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header. Example: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your pages can be embedded in frames on other sites, making them vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the X-Frame-Options header. Example: `X-Frame-Options: DENY`

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without X-Content-Type-Options, the browser may mistakenly treat files as scripts, leading to possible execution of malicious content.

    Fix: Add the X-Content-Type-Options header. Example: `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff`

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Missing Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Lacking a Referrer-Policy exposes full addresses of sites users have visited, which can leak sensitive information.

    Fix: Add a Referrer-Policy header. Example: `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade`

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  5. 5

    Exposing Framework VersionLow

    Why it matters: Disclosing the framework in X-Powered-By may enable attackers to exploit specific vulnerabilities tied to that version.

    Fix: Consider removing or altering the X-Powered-By header. Example: `X-Powered-By: <YOUR SECURE HEADER`

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts Without SRILow

    Why it matters: Running scripts without Subresource Integrity (SRI) from an external domain could lead to unauthorized script execution if that domain is compromised.

    Fix: Implement SRI when including third-party scripts; add hash attributes to `<script>` tags.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  7. 7

    Missing Permissions PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: Without a Permissions-Policy, unnecessary browser features may be available to injected scripts, increasing risk.

    Fix: Add a Permissions-Policy header. Example: `Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(self), microphone=(self), camera=(self)`

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 32 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://submi.io/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/directories → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/tools/directory-gap → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/tools/gap-analysis → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/docs → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/blog → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/pricing → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/contact → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/tools → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/refunds → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/blog/best-directory-submission-service → no content-security-policy
    • https://submi.io/faq → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://submi.io/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/directories → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/tools/directory-gap → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/tools/gap-analysis → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/docs → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/blog → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/pricing → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/contact → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/tools → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/refunds → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/blog/best-directory-submission-service → no x-frame-options
    • https://submi.io/faq → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://submi.io/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/directories → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/tools/directory-gap → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/tools/gap-analysis → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/docs → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/blog → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/pricing → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/contact → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/tools → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/refunds → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/blog/best-directory-submission-service → no x-content-type-options
    • https://submi.io/faq → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://submi.io/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/directories → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/tools/directory-gap → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/tools/gap-analysis → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/docs → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/blog → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/pricing → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/contact → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/tools → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/refunds → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/blog/best-directory-submission-service → no referrer-policy
    • https://submi.io/faq → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://submi.io/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/directories → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/tools/directory-gap → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/tools/gap-analysis → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/docs → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/blog → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/pricing → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/contact → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/tools → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/refunds → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/blog/best-directory-submission-service → no permissions-policy
    • https://submi.io/faq → no permissions-policy
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: Vercel (93 responses)
    • x-powered-by: Next.js (32 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • app.submi.io (64 script tags)
7 checks passed, 2 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 32 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 32 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    3 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near submi.io

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling submi.io from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own submi.io?