Scanned sites / spokanevalleychamber.org / 2026-09-10-0732

spokanevalleychamber.org scan from 2026-09-10 07:32:59 UTC DR 46

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-10-0732

Scanned 2026-09-10 07:32:59 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 17:07:09 UTC

Site: https://spokanevalleychamber.org/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

69/ 100Needs work

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 749 pages and 1025 assets of spokanevalleychamber.org, starting from https://spokanevalleychamber.org/. It scored 69 out of 100, a result that needs work. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (144), title tags (389), meta descriptions (475); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−5.6), meta descriptions (−5.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 3 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
749
Assets fetched
1025
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,774 of 1,776 discovered URLs were fetched, 1,280 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 1004 left unchecked.

  • Title tags389 issues
    389 of 506 pages have title issues. 186 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.6 points
  • Meta descriptions475 issues
    475 of 506 pages have meta description issues. 186 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.5 points
  • Headings492 issues
    492 of 506 pages have heading issues. 186 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.3 points
  • Broken links37 issues
    38 internal links point at 37 broken URLs.
    −1.1 points
  • Links to other sites18 issues
    18 destinations answered with an error, 62 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 1004 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −1 points
  • Redirects20 issues
    21 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses37 issues
    60 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 57 of them are pages, 37 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.5 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability155 issues
    155 of 671 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 21 pages noindex by design.
    −2.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 406 image references have no alt attribute. 389 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets144 issues
    144 assets larger than 500 KB among 1025 fetched assets. 5 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages5 issues
    5 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage506 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 506 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.4 points
  • Internal link counts9 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 9 worth a look.
  • Thin content5 issues
    5 of 506 pages have fewer than 200 words. 186 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Duplicate content34 issues
    3 groups of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.4 points
  • URL format190 noted
    190 of 749 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals186 noted
    186 of 692 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives692 noted
    692 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text284 noted
    284 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure8 noted
    8 of 506 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 186 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length32 noted
    32 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies6 noted
    6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 692 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 1774 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 692 pages; 584 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 42 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2317 sites, median 79%, average 78%

spokanevalleychamber.org scores 69%, higher than 16% of the 2317 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites69% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several SEO issues that need attention, particularly with broken links, redirects, and missing titles and meta descriptions. Addressing these will significantly improve user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 38 internal links to broken URLs hinder user navigation.

    How: Identify and replace or remove broken links using the link checker tool.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Redirects

    Why: 21 redirects may slow down page loading and dilute link equity.

    How: Review and streamline unnecessary redirects; ideally, point to final destinations directly.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 60 URLs returning non-200 responses affect accessibility.

    How: Audit those URLs and either restore their content or update links.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 388 pages have issues with titles, affecting SEO performance.

    How: Review and modify titles to meet length guidelines (60 characters or less).

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 464 pages lack effective meta descriptions, impacting click-through rates.

    How: Write concise, relevant meta descriptions for affected pages (160 characters or less).

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Fix Missing Headings

    Why: 492 pages lack proper headings, which is critical for user experience and SEO.

    How: Add H1 tags where missing, ideally including relevant keywords.

    Checks: headings

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The analysis of your website reveals critical security headers are missing, including protections against man-in-the-middle attacks, clickjacking, and MIME-sniffing. Additionally, some resources are loaded insecurely over HTTP, which can compromise security. Implementing recommended headers will significantly enhance your site’s security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 3 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors typing the address without ‘https://’ can be intercepted on their first request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, there's no restriction on where scripts, styles, and frames may load from, which can lead to cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this header, your pages can be embedded in frames on other sites, increasing clickjacking risk.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may incorrectly interpret files as scripts due to their contents.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Mixed Content on PageLow

    Why it matters: One resource is loaded over HTTP on an HTTPS page which can lead to security vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Change the image URL http://spokanevalleychamber.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Boeing_PMSblue_large-300x109.jpg to use HTTPS.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains could be compromised, affecting your website's security.

    Fix: Consider implementing a CSP that restricts these scripts or use Subresource Integrity (SRI) attributes.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/membership-benefits/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/affinity-programs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/small-networking-groups/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/chamber-champions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/business-health-trust/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/certificates-of-origin/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/signature-events/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/strategic-priorities/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/development-tracker/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/government-action-committee/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/manufacturing-connect/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 692 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/membership-benefits/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/affinity-programs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/small-networking-groups/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/chamber-champions/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/business-health-trust/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/certificates-of-origin/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/signature-events/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/strategic-priorities/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/development-tracker/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/government-action-committee/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/manufacturing-connect/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/membership-benefits/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/affinity-programs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/small-networking-groups/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/chamber-champions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/business-health-trust/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/certificates-of-origin/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/signature-events/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/strategic-priorities/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/development-tracker/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/government-action-committee/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/manufacturing-connect/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/membership-benefits/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/affinity-programs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/small-networking-groups/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/chamber-champions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/business-health-trust/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/certificates-of-origin/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/signature-events/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/strategic-priorities/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/development-tracker/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/government-action-committee/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/manufacturing-connect/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    1 resource on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://spokanevalleychamber.org/chamber-news/boeing-to-present-2018-… loads image http://spokanevalleychamber.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/Boeing_PMSblue_large-300x109.j…
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • static.klaviyo.com (40 script tags)
7 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 692 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    55 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near spokanevalleychamber.org

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling spokanevalleychamber.org from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own spokanevalleychamber.org?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming spokanevalleychamber.org. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.