Scanned sites / sjm.lat / 2026-09-08-2015

sjm.lat scan from 2026-09-08 20:15:31 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-08-2015

Scanned 2026-09-08 20:15:31 UTC, finished 2026-09-08 20:15:41 UTC

Site: https://sjm.lat/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

72/ 100Needs work

On September 8, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 6 pages and 6 assets of sjm.lat, starting from https://sjm.lat/. It scored 72 out of 100, a result that needs work. 5 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by indexability (6), title tags (5), thin content (3); 16 checks passed. Most of the points went to indexability (−10), title tags (−8.3), thin content (−4). 5 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
6
Assets fetched
6
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
5 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

12 of 12 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 3 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags5 issues
    5 of 6 pages have title issues.
    −8.3 points
  • Meta descriptions2 issues
    2 of 6 pages have meta description issues.
    −2.7 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 6 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites12 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 3 destinations checked.
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability6 issues
    6 of 6 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −10 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 12 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 6 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage3 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://sjm.lat/sitemap.xml (404). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 6 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 6 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 6 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals6 noted
    6 of 6 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 6 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 6 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 6 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 9 response headers recorded across 12 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 6 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2311 sites, median 79%, average 78%

sjm.lat scores 72%, higher than 23% of the 2311 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 69 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 60 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites72% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several key issues impacting SEO, including missing canonical tags, short title tags, and the absence of a sitemap. Prioritizing these will improve your site's performance and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: A 404 error on your sitemap affects search engine crawling.

    How: Create a sitemap and place it at /sitemap.xml.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Add Canonical Tags

    Why: Canonical tags help avoid duplicate content issues and clarify prioritization for search engines.

    How: Add a canonical tag in the <head> section of each page: <link rel='canonical' href='URL'>.

    Checks: indexability

  3. 3

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Short title tags can limit search engine optimization for your pages.

    How: Revise each title tag to be descriptive and include primary keywords (50-60 characters).

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Optimize Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions guide click-through rates from search results.

    How: Shorten and revise meta descriptions to less than 160 characters, focusing on core content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Thin Content

    Why: Pages with insufficient content may rank lower in search results.

    How: Expand content on affected pages, targeting over 200 words by adding relevant information.

    Checks: thin-content

  6. 6

    Implement a Sitemap

    Why: A sitemap enhances crawling efficiency for search engines.

    How: Use a sitemap generator or create an XML file manually, listing important pages.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security headers missing, exposing it to vulnerabilities such as script injection and clickjacking. Implementing recommended headers and reviewing third-party scripts can enhance the security posture of your site significantly.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on the first HTTP request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts and other resources, increasing XSS risks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-OptionsMedium

    Why it matters: Without this, your site can be framed by others, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Lack of this header allows the browser to sneakily execute scripts based on content rather than type.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-party scripts lack Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Using third-party scripts without SRI risks malicious changes to script content.

    Fix: Consider adding Subresource Integrity or a Content-Security-Policy that defines trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://sjm.lat/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sjm.lat/products/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sjm.lat/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sjm.lat/careers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sjm.lat/products/view.php?slug=idrak → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sjm.lat/blog/post.php?slug=sjm-voice-1 → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 6 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://sjm.lat/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sjm.lat/products/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sjm.lat/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sjm.lat/careers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sjm.lat/products/view.php?slug=idrak → no content-security-policy
    • https://sjm.lat/blog/post.php?slug=sjm-voice-1 → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://sjm.lat/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sjm.lat/products/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sjm.lat/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sjm.lat/careers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sjm.lat/products/view.php?slug=idrak → no x-frame-options
    • https://sjm.lat/blog/post.php?slug=sjm-voice-1 → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://sjm.lat/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sjm.lat/products/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sjm.lat/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sjm.lat/careers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sjm.lat/products/view.php?slug=idrak → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sjm.lat/blog/post.php?slug=sjm-voice-1 → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (6 script tags)
7 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 6 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near sjm.lat

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling sjm.lat from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own sjm.lat?