Scanned sites / sitebulb.com / 2026-09-13-0332

sitebulb.com scan from 2026-09-13 03:32:03 UTC DR 75

A newer scan exists. See the latest report for sitebulb.com.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-0332

Scanned 2026-09-13 03:32:03 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 05:18:46 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://sitebulb.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

84/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 821 pages and 1013 assets of sitebulb.com, starting from https://sitebulb.com/. It scored 84 out of 100, a good result. 13 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (13), meta descriptions (418), title tags (275); 4 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.2), title tags (−3.5). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
821
Assets fetched
1013
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
13 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,834 of 1,839 discovered URLs were fetched, 3 blocked by robots.txt, 5,123 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 300 link destinations on other sites were checked, 2222 left unchecked.

  • Title tags275 issues
    275 of 609 pages have title issues. 178 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions418 issues
    418 of 609 pages have meta description issues. 178 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.2 points
  • Headings3 issues
    3 of 609 pages have heading issues. 178 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links2 issues
    2 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.1 points
  • Links to other sites11 issues
    11 destinations answered with an error, 108 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 2222 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −0.6 points
  • Redirects28 issues
    30 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses6 issues
    52 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 34 of them are pages, 6 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability7 issues
    7 of 687 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 100 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt text11,462 issues
    11462 of 52594 image references have no alt attribute. 24341 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −1.3 points
  • Heavy assets13 issues
    13 assets larger than 500 KB among 1013 fetched assets. 2 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages15 issues
    15 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage45 issues
    1 sitemap listing 589 URLs: 25 crawled pages missing, 5 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 15 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.3 points
  • Internal link counts102 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 102 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 609 pages have fewer than 200 words. 178 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content6 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format123 noted
    123 of 821 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals87 noted
    87 of 787 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives100 noted
    100 pages carry a robots directive; 687 carry none.
  • Anchor text225 noted
    225 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure104 noted
    104 of 609 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 178 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length297 noted
    44 images over 100 KB; 253 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies6 noted
    6 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s7 noted
    7 pages answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 1834 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 787 pages; 613 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 72 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2334 sites, median 79%, average 78%

sitebulb.com scores 84%, higher than 69% of the 2334 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 109 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 72 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites84% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has some issues needing attention, including broken links and missing meta information. Addressing these can improve SEO performance significantly.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links result in poor user experience and can harm SEO rankings.

    How: Update or remove the 2 broken internal links. Replace them with correct URLs or redirect them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can prevent search engines from crawling key pages.

    How: Investigate the 52 URLs with issues and ensure they return a 200 status. Redirect or restore if needed.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags enhances visibility and click-through rates in search results.

    How: Revise 275 pages with title issues to ensure they are concise and within optimal length.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Enhancing meta descriptions can increase organic click-through rates.

    How: Add or revise meta descriptions for 339 pages, ensuring they are engaging and within character limits.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Proper heading structure improves readability and SEO.

    How: Convert duplicate H1 tags to proper headings on the 3 affected pages.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address Sitemap Coverage Issues

    Why: Improving sitemap coverage helps ensure all important pages are indexed.

    How: Update the sitemap to remove broken URLs and ensure all relevant pages are included.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks essential security headers, putting users at risk of various attacks such as mixed content and clickjacking. Immediate action is required to strengthen defenses against potential threats.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, a user may be intercepted when typing the site's address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Implement HSTS by adding the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of CSP allows scripts and styles from unknown sources, increasing XSS risk.

    Fix: Add a CSP header, such as: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without it, pages can be embedded in a frame, risking clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY or Content-Security-Policy: frame-ancestors 'none';

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Mixed Content on HTTPS PagesMedium

    Why it matters: Loading some resources via HTTP can lead to security vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Change resource URLs from HTTP to HTTPS wherever possible.

    Evidence: Mixed content

  5. 5

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 3.1.1 poses security risks due to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-OptionsLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may execute files incorrectly based on their contents.

    Fix: Include the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://sitebulb.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/mcp/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/product/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/prioritized-hints/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/evergreen-googlebot-crawler/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/audit-comparison/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/cloud/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/remote-team-collaboration/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/automated-website-crawling/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/crawl-huge-websites/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/automated-client-reporting/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 787 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://sitebulb.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/mcp/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/product/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/prioritized-hints/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/evergreen-googlebot-crawler/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/audit-comparison/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/cloud/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/remote-team-collaboration/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/automated-website-crawling/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/crawl-huge-websites/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/automated-client-reporting/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    3 of 787 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://sitebulb.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/mcp/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/product/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/prioritized-hints/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/evergreen-googlebot-crawler/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/audit-comparison/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/cloud/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/remote-team-collaboration/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/automated-website-crawling/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/crawl-huge-websites/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/automated-client-reporting/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://sitebulb.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/mcp/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/product/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/prioritized-hints/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/evergreen-googlebot-crawler/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/audit-comparison/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/cloud/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/remote-team-collaboration/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/automated-website-crawling/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/crawl-huge-websites/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://sitebulb.com/features/automated-client-reporting/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundMixed contentMedium

    4 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP, 2 of them scripts or stylesheets that browsers block or that can be tampered with in transit.

    • https://sitebulb.com/hints/security/mixed-content-loads-http-resource… loads stylesheet http://httpbin.org/Assets/Css/below-fold.css?v=17
    • https://sitebulb.com/hints/security/mixed-content-loads-http-resource… loads script http://httpbin.org/tracker.min.js
    • https://sitebulb.com/hints/security/mixed-content-loads-http-resource… loads image http://httpbin.org/image
    • https://sitebulb.com/hints/security/mixed-content-loads-http-resource… loads image http://httpbin.org/image
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 3.1.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 3.1.1 in https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.1.1.min.js: CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • fast.wistia.com (14 script tags)
    • s3.amazonaws.com (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /documentation-temp*
5 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 787 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    48 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near sitebulb.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling sitebulb.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own sitebulb.com?