Scanned sites / sherwoodvet.com / 2026-10-01-0600

sherwoodvet.com scan from 10/1/2026, 6:00:52 AM

Scan 2026-10-01-0600

Scanned 10/1/2026, 6:00:52 AM, finished 10/1/2026, 6:39:53 AM. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://sherwoodvet.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

72/ 100Needs work

On October 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 28 pages and 212 assets of sherwoodvet.com, starting from https://sherwoodvet.com/. It scored 72 out of 100, a result that needs work. 9 of 16 checks found something to fix, led by headings (26), heavy assets (10), meta descriptions (17); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to headings (−6), heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.2). 2 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
28
Assets fetched
212
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 16
CoverageComplete crawl

240 of 240 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 6 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags9 issues
    9 of 26 pages have title issues.
    −3.5 points
  • Meta descriptions17 issues
    17 of 26 pages have meta description issues.
    −5.2 points
  • Headings26 issues
    26 of 26 pages have heading issues.
    −6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 6 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects2 issues
    3 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses15 noted
    15 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 2 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 26 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 83 image references have no alt attribute. 40 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets10 issues
    10 assets larger than 500 KB among 212 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages9 issues
    9 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.4 points
  • Sitemap coverage10 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 27 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 9 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 26 pages.
  • Thin content11 issues
    11 of 26 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −3.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

1754 sites, median 80%, average 79%

sherwoodvet.com scores 72%, higher than 20% of the 1754 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0511020%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 0 sites15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 2 sites38%: 2 sites39%: 1 site40%: 2 sites41%: 1 site42%: 0 sites43%: 1 site44%: 0 sites45%: 3 sites46%: 2 sites47%: 3 sites48%: 2 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 4 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 7 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 7 sites55%: 4 sites56%: 6 sites57%: 6 sites58%: 11 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 9 sites61%: 11 sites62%: 15 sites63%: 16 sites64%: 12 sites65%: 20 sites66%: 19 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 27 sites69%: 25 sites70%: 39 sites71%: 37 sites72%: 49 sites73%: 49 sites74%: 48 sites75%: 57 sites76%: 71 sites77%: 63 sites78%: 83 sites79%: 60 sites80%: 85 sites81%: 102 sites82%: 82 sites83%: 82 sites84%: 77 sites85%: 59 sites86%: 64 sites87%: 55 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 53 sites90%: 32 sites91%: 34 sites92%: 24 sites93%: 14 sites94%: 12 sites95%: 10 sites96%: 7 sites97%: 8 sites98%: 2 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 54 sites72% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Your site has several areas needing improvement. Prioritize fixing redirects, updating title tags, meta descriptions, heading structure, and addressing thin content. Optimize large assets to enhance performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can harm user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove the URLs to avoid redirects, especially for key pages.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 9 pages have title issues impacting SEO visibility.

    How: Revise titles to ensure each is unique and within the recommended length.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: 17 pages are missing meta descriptions, lowering click-through rates.

    How: Create concise, keyword-rich meta descriptions for these pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Revise Headings Structure

    Why: All pages have heading issues that can hinder SEO.

    How: Ensure only one H1 per page and use H2s appropriately.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Improve Thin Content

    Why: Pages with less than 200 words may not provide value to users.

    How: Enrich content by adding relevant information to these low-word count pages.

    Checks: thin-content

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets can slow page load times, affecting user experience.

    How: Compress or defer loading for assets over 500 KB.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website lacks a Content Security Policy, which increases the risk of cross-site scripting attacks. While the server discloses its framework and third-party scripts are used without integrity checks, these vulnerabilities are less severe. Implementing a CSP and reviewing third-party script usage will enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy. Add the following header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Software Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Disclosing the server framework can assist attackers in exploiting known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Consider removing the X-Powered-By header or anonymizing its content. Header can be removed from nginx configuration.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  3. 3

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Integrity ChecksLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be compromised, posing risks to site security.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for scripts from www.google.com or create a restrictions policy in a CSP.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 26 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://sherwoodvet.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/about-regina-sk-veterinarian/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/regina-sk-veterinary-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/regina-sk-all-veterinary-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/regina-sk-veterinary-companion-animals/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/regina-sk-veterinary-equine-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/regina-sk-veterinary-emergency-and-after-hours-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/anesthesia-patient-monitoring/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/medical-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/nutritional-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://sherwoodvet.com/pet-supplies/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: nginx (240 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (33 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (18 script tags)
12 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 26 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 26 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 26 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 26 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 26 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 26 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    46 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near sherwoodvet.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling sherwoodvet.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own sherwoodvet.com?

sherwoodvet.com scan 2026-10-01-0600 | DIY SEO Hub