Scanned sites / seoclusterizer.com / 2026-10-18-1643

seoclusterizer.com scan from 2026-10-18 16:43:00 UTC DR 5

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-10-18-1643

Scanned 2026-10-18 16:43:00 UTC, finished 2026-10-18 16:48:24 UTC. Found with 42backlinks.com tool directory

Site: https://seoclusterizer.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

96/ 100Excellent

On October 18, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 386 pages and 165 assets of seoclusterizer.com, starting from https://seoclusterizer.com/. It scored 96 out of 100, an excellent result. 5 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (73), meta descriptions (46), heavy assets (1); 21 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−1.9), meta descriptions (−1), heavy assets (−0.6). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
386
Assets fetched
165
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
5 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

551 of 551 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 8 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags73 issues
    73 of 210 pages have title issues. 176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Meta descriptions46 issues
    46 of 210 pages have meta description issues. 176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 210 pages have heading issues. 176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 2 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 8 destinations checked.
    −0.2 points
  • RedirectsOK
    0 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 0 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 210 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 176 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 0 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 165 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    1 sitemap listing 210 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts176 noted
    Internal link counts for 386 pages; 176 worth a look.
  • Thin content18 issues
    18 of 210 pages have fewer than 200 words. 176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.4 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 386 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 386 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives386 noted
    386 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure66 noted
    66 of 210 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 176 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 386 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    210 pages declare hreflang, with 4574 annotations, and every one checks out.
  • Structured data30 noted
    386 of 210 indexable pages carry structured data: Organization (386), WebSite (385), BreadcrumbList (240), ListItem (240), WebPage (120). 30 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 208 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 386 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions30 noted
    30 of 210 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    1 cookie set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 551 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 386 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling17 noted
    17 words an English dictionary does not know, on 17 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2284 sites, median 79%, average 78%

seoclusterizer.com scores 96%, higher than 96% of the 2284 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571130%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 0 sites10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 1 site28%: 0 sites29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 6 sites47%: 4 sites48%: 4 sites49%: 5 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 13 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 6 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 21 sites63%: 25 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 36 sites66%: 34 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 45 sites70%: 40 sites71%: 66 sites72%: 75 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 64 sites75%: 73 sites76%: 88 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 110 sites79%: 89 sites80%: 104 sites81%: 113 sites82%: 110 sites83%: 91 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 79 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 68 sites88%: 60 sites89%: 60 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 32 sites93%: 20 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 9 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 9 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 0 sites100%: 70 sites96% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has some technical SEO issues that need addressing, primarily around heavy assets, title tags, and meta descriptions. Prioritizing these will improve performance and user experience.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: One asset returns a 404 error, potentially affecting user experience.

    How: Identify if image or asset can be removed or replaced. Update links accordingly.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: Large assets slow down page load times.

    How: Compress and optimize the listed scripts and images to decrease size significantly.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  3. 3

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: 73 pages have title issues which can affect SEO rankings.

    How: Shorten titles over 60 characters and adjust those under 30 to improve relevance.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 46 pages have meta description issues that may negatively impact SERP click-through rates.

    How: Revise descriptions over 160 characters and those with potential cuts.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Thin Content

    Why: 18 pages contain thin content, risking lower SEO performance.

    How: Add relevant content to pages identified with fewer than 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site lacks critical security headers, exposing it to potential attacks such as cross-site scripting and clickjacking. Specifically, there are no Content Security Policy or X-Frame-Options headers, which is concerning for safe script and frame usage. Implementing these measures is essential to enhance overall security.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, allowing malicious content from untrusted sources.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header to each response, e.g., `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: The absence of X-Frame-Options allows the site to be embedded in frames on other sites, which could lead to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add `X-Frame-Options: DENY` header to all HTML responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Server Banner Reveals FrameworkLow

    Why it matters: The X-Powered-By header discloses the use of the Express framework, which could inform attackers about potential vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Consider removing or modifying the `X-Powered-By` header or using server configurations to hide details.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  4. 4

    Missing Permissions-Policy HeaderInfo

    Why it matters: Without a Permissions-Policy header, the site does not restrict potentially harmful browser features that could be exploited by injected scripts.

    Fix: Include a Permissions-Policy header, e.g., `Permissions-Policy: geolocation=(), microphone=(), camera=();`.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 386 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://seoclusterizer.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/pricing → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/about → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/auth → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/content-analyzer → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/serp-clustering → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/the-force → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/bulk-analyzer → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/solutions → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/keyword-mapping → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/seo-content-brief-generator → no content-security-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/solutions/keyword-clustering-tool → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://seoclusterizer.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/pricing → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/about → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/auth → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/content-analyzer → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/serp-clustering → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/the-force → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/bulk-analyzer → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/solutions → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/keyword-mapping → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/seo-content-brief-generator → no x-frame-options
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/solutions/keyword-clustering-tool → no x-frame-options
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://seoclusterizer.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/pricing → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/about → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/auth → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/content-analyzer → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/serp-clustering → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/the-force → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/bulk-analyzer → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/solutions → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/keyword-mapping → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/seo-content-brief-generator → no permissions-policy
    • https://seoclusterizer.com/solutions/keyword-clustering-tool → no permissions-policy
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (551 responses)
    • x-powered-by: Express (551 responses)
11 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 386 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 386 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 386 HTML pages.

  • OKReferrer policy

    referrer-policy is set on all 386 HTML pages.

  • OKCookie flags

    All 1 cookie carry Secure, HttpOnly and SameSite flags.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    1 form found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    Scripts from 1 other domain all carry Subresource Integrity hashes.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near seoclusterizer.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling seoclusterizer.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own seoclusterizer.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming seoclusterizer.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.