Scanned sites / scottsplumbing.us

SEO report for scottsplumbing.us DR 1

The latest Site Spider scan of scottsplumbing.us, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/scottsplumbing-us/2026-09-10-1028.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 10:28:10 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 17:17:50 UTC

Site: https://scottsplumbing.us/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 177 pages and 396 assets of scottsplumbing.us, starting from https://scottsplumbing.us/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (49), meta descriptions (46), redirects (57); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−4.1), meta descriptions (−3.1), redirects (−1.9). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 2 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
177
Assets fetched
396
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

573 of 573 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 35 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags49 issues
    49 of 115 pages have title issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.1 points
  • Meta descriptions46 issues
    46 of 115 pages have meta description issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.1 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 115 pages have heading issues. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.1 points
  • Broken links1 issue
    1 internal link point at 1 broken URL.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites2 issues
    2 destinations answered with an error, 11 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 27 destinations checked.
    −0.7 points
  • Redirects57 issues
    58 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1.9 points
  • Non-200 responses1 issue
    59 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 58 of them are pages, 1 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability4 issues
    4 of 119 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 984 image references have no alt attribute. 4 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 396 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.1 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    4 sitemaps listing 114 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.2 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 119 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 115 pages have fewer than 200 words. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format3 noted
    3 of 177 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals4 noted
    4 of 119 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives119 noted
    119 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text73 noted
    73 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure24 noted
    24 of 115 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 4 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length41 noted
    39 images over 100 KB; 2 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 119 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 573 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 119 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2316 sites, median 79%, average 78%

scottsplumbing.us scores 87%, higher than 80% of the 2316 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 104 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several issues need addressing to improve SEO performance including broken links and missing meta descriptions. Focus on high-impact fixes for better visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Link

    Why: Improves user experience and SEO.

    How: Update the internal link on the page to point to a valid URL.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensures all pages are accessible to users and search engines.

    How: Review the URLs and correct or remove those causing issues.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Revise Title Tags

    Why: Optimizes search engine visibility.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters where necessary.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Enhances click-through rate from search results.

    How: Write new meta descriptions under 160 characters for those missing or too long.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Ensures proper content structure and SEO.

    How: Remove duplicate H1 tags from the identified pages.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link Orphan Pages

    Why: Ensures all pages are discoverable by users and search engines.

    How: Add internal links pointing to the orphan pages from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review reveals several critical protections missing from your website, including headers for secure communication and content management. Implementing these measures will help shield your site from common vulnerabilities and improve user trust.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted when they type your website address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to all HTTP responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of a CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts, leading to potential exploitation via XSS attacks.

    Fix: Include the header 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to your HTML pages.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Not using X-Frame-Options could allow malicious sites to frame your website, leading to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' or implement a CSP with frame-ancestors directive.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might execute files as scripts based on their content rather than declared type.

    Fix: Set the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in your HTTP responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external sources can be compromised, affecting your website’s security.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity (SRI) for external scripts or enforce a CSP that restricts allowed sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  6. 6

    Sensitive Paths Revealed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing sensitive paths in robots.txt can disclose areas that should be protected, aiding malicious actors.

    Fix: Ensure proper access controls are in place for /wp-admin/ and consider removing or securing this entry from robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://scottsplumbing.us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/commercial-plumbing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/drain-cleaning/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/emergency-plumbing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/fixture-installation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/gas-line-plumbing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/leak-detection/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/pipe-repair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/sewer-line-repair/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/water-filtration/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/water-heater/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 119 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://scottsplumbing.us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/commercial-plumbing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/drain-cleaning/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/emergency-plumbing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/fixture-installation/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/gas-line-plumbing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/leak-detection/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/pipe-repair/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/sewer-line-repair/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/water-filtration/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/water-heater/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://scottsplumbing.us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/commercial-plumbing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/drain-cleaning/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/emergency-plumbing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/fixture-installation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/gas-line-plumbing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/leak-detection/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/pipe-repair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/sewer-line-repair/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/water-filtration/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/water-heater/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://scottsplumbing.us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/commercial-plumbing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/drain-cleaning/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/emergency-plumbing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/fixture-installation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/gas-line-plumbing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/leak-detection/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/pipe-repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/sewer-line-repair/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/water-filtration/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scottsplumbing.us/water-heater/ → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • maps.googleapis.com (8 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 119 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of scottsplumbing.us

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near scottsplumbing.us

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling scottsplumbing.us from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own scottsplumbing.us?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming scottsplumbing.us. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.