Scanned sites / scharfsteinlaw.com / 2026-09-13-1852

scharfsteinlaw.com scan from 2026-09-13 18:52:37 UTC DR 19

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-1852

Scanned 2026-09-13 18:52:37 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 19:03:57 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://scharfsteinlaw.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 54 pages and 301 assets of scharfsteinlaw.com, starting from https://scharfsteinlaw.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (41), heavy assets (9), title tags (15); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.6), heavy assets (−5.4), title tags (−3). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
54
Assets fetched
301
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

355 of 360 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 11 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags15 issues
    15 of 49 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3 points
  • Meta descriptions41 issues
    41 of 49 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −6.6 points
  • Headings16 issues
    16 of 49 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sitesOK
    0 destinations answered with an error, of 10 destinations checked.
  • Redirects4 issues
    6 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses8 noted
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 49 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 1 page noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 1659 image references have no alt attribute. 1626 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets9 issues
    9 assets larger than 500 KB among 301 fetched assets. 56 documents over that size are listed but not counted: downloads are not page weight.
    −5.4 points
  • Orphan pages6 issues
    6 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.5 points
  • Sitemap coverage6 issues
    7 sitemaps listing 49 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 6 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.7 points
  • Internal link counts2 noted
    Internal link counts for 50 pages; 2 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 49 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 54 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 50 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives50 noted
    50 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure39 noted
    39 of 49 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length42 noted
    42 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies3 noted
    3 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 50 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 355 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 50 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 51 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

scharfsteinlaw.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

There are multiple SEO issues impacting your site, including non-200 responses and title and meta description issues. Addressing these will enhance performance and visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: Resolve pages that don't return a 2xx status to improve user experience.

    How: Update or remove the affected URLs to return 200 status codes.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improve SEO and click-through rates by fixing short or missing title tags.

    How: Ensure all title tags are between 50-60 characters and accurately describe page content.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Revise Meta Descriptions

    Why: Enhance engagement and rankings by resolving missing or overly long meta descriptions.

    How: Add concise, relevant meta descriptions under 160 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Redirects can affect user experience and SEO.

    How: Consolidate URLs by updating or removing redirects for efficiency.

    Checks: redirects

  5. 5

    Fix Heading Issues

    Why: Multiple H1s can confuse search engines about the page's main topic.

    How: Ensure each page has only one H1 tag, relevant to the content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Pages

    Why: Internal linking helps with page discoverability and user navigation.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages from relevant content pages.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The analysis of your website revealed several security issues that could expose it to risks. These include missing headers for enhanced security, potential exposure of sensitive information, and lack of restrictions on loaded contents. Addressing these findings promptly will help safeguard your site and visitors.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users accessing the site without HTTPS can be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Lack of Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of resources, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, your site can be embedded in frames on malicious sites.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: The API key is visible to all visitors, exposing it to misuse.

    Fix: Restrict the API key by setting HTTP referrers in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might treat files as scripts based on their content.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Server Version DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Server version information can help attackers identify vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Hide server version by configuring the server settings. For Apache, set: ServerTokens Prod and ServerSignature Off.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/our-firm/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/legal-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/pay-invoice/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/class-action/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/civil-litigation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/real-estate/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/family-law/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/estates-wills-trusts/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/administrative-law/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 50 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/our-firm/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/legal-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/pay-invoice/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/class-action/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/civil-litigation/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/real-estate/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/family-law/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/estates-wills-trusts/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/administrative-law/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/our-firm/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/legal-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/pay-invoice/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/class-action/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/civil-litigation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/real-estate/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/family-law/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/estates-wills-trusts/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/administrative-law/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/our-firm/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/our-lawyers/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/legal-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/pay-invoice/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/class-action/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/civil-litigation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/real-estate/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/family-law/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/estates-wills-trusts/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://scharfsteinlaw.com/services/administrative-law/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: Apache/2.4.48 (355 responses)
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…RY (39 chars) in https://scharfsteinlaw.com/contact/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • unpkg.com (80 script tags)
    • www.bugherd.com (40 script tags)
    • www.google.com (121 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • js.stripe.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp/wp-admin/
5 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 50 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near scharfsteinlaw.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling scharfsteinlaw.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own scharfsteinlaw.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming scharfsteinlaw.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.