Scanned sites / royaloceankelp.com / 2026-09-13-1100

royaloceankelp.com scan from 2026-09-13 11:00:01 UTC DR 2

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-1100

Scanned 2026-09-13 11:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 11:12:20 UTC. Found on page 1 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://royaloceankelp.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

62/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 3 pages and 48 assets of royaloceankelp.com, starting from https://royaloceankelp.com/. It scored 62 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (2), meta descriptions (2), headings (2); 12 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−10), meta descriptions (−8), headings (−6). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
3
Assets fetched
48
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

51 of 51 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 1 link destination on other sites was checked.

  • Title tags2 issues
    2 of 2 pages have title issues.
    −10 points
  • Meta descriptions2 issues
    2 of 2 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 2 pages have heading issues.
    −6 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites2 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 1 destination checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
    −2 points
  • Non-200 responses5 noted
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 2 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −5 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 12 image references have no alt attribute. 12 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets3 issues
    3 assets larger than 500 KB among 48 fetched assets.
    −1.8 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
    −2 points
  • Sitemap coverage1 issue
    1 sitemap listing 2 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 1 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 2 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 2 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 3 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 2 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 2 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 2 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length8 noted
    8 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 2 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 9 response headers recorded across 51 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 2 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights2 noted
    Mobile performance 52 on average across 2 pages; 2 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2866 sites, median 80%, average 79%

royaloceankelp.com scores 62%, higher than 6% of the 2866 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 10 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites62% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several SEO issues, primarily with title tags, meta descriptions, and non-200 responses. Addressing these will improve your site's health significantly and enhance visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Non-200 Responses

    Why: This will make sure all pages are accessible and functioning.

    How: Check for and repair the 404 errors on the listed assets. Ensure robots.txt is accessible.

    Checks: status-codes

  2. 2

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Short titles negatively affect search visibility; they should be descriptive.

    How: Revise titles for https://royaloceankelp.com/ and https://royaloceankelp.com/Thank-You/ to 50-60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Improving meta descriptions can increase click-through rates from search results.

    How: Write compelling meta descriptions for both pages, aim for 50-160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Resolve Multiple H1 Tags

    Why: Using multiple H1s confuses search engines about the main topic of the page.

    How: Change H1 tags on both pages to a single, descriptive H1.

    Checks: headings

  5. 5

    Add Canonical Tags

    Why: Canonical tags help prevent duplicate content issues and guide search engine indexing.

    How: Add a canonical tag pointing to the main URL of https://royaloceankelp.com/.

    Checks: indexability

  6. 6

    Link to Orphan Page

    Why: Internal links improve navigation and help search engines discover all content.

    How: Add a link to the Thank You page from a relevant page of your site.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site royaloceankelp.com has several important security issues that need to be addressed. Key protections such as HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), Content Security Policy (CSP), and X-Frame-Options are missing, exposing the site to potential attacks. Additionally, a Google API key is publicly exposed, which needs to be secured.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users can be intercepted on initial requests without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted script and resource loading, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header makes pages vulnerable to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: Publicly accessible API keys can be abused if not restricted properly.

    Fix: Restrict the key by referrer in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might misinterpret files and execute unwanted scripts.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Third-Party Scripts Without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains can be compromised, affecting site security.

    Fix: Use Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or implement a CSP.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://royaloceankelp.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://royaloceankelp.com/Thank-You/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 2 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://royaloceankelp.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royaloceankelp.com/Thank-You/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://royaloceankelp.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://royaloceankelp.com/Thank-You/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://royaloceankelp.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://royaloceankelp.com/Thank-You/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…pg (39 chars) in https://royaloceankelp.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • maps.googleapis.com (2 script tags)
6 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 2 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableSensitive paths in robots.txt

    No robots.txt was fetched.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near royaloceankelp.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling royaloceankelp.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own royaloceankelp.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming royaloceankelp.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.