Scanned sites / royalloopvet.com / 2026-11-02-0411

royalloopvet.com scan from 2026-11-02 04:11:33 UTC DR 10

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-02-0411

Scanned 2026-11-02 04:11:33 UTC, finished 2026-11-02 16:59:52 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://royalloopvet.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On November 2, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 35 pages and 171 assets of royalloopvet.com, starting from https://royalloopvet.com/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 3 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (17), redirects (18), title tags (5); 21 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), redirects (−4), title tags (−2.9). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
35
Assets fetched
171
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
3 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

206 of 207 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 9 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags5 issues
    5 of 17 pages have title issues.
    −2.9 points
  • Meta descriptionsOK
    0 of 17 pages have meta description issues.
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 17 pages have heading issues.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites17 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 9 destinations checked.
  • Redirects18 issues
    19 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −4 points
  • Non-200 responses23 noted
    23 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 18 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 17 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 23 image references have no alt attribute. 8 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets17 issues
    17 assets larger than 500 KB among 171 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    2 sitemaps listing 17 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 17 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 17 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format17 noted
    17 of 35 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 17 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives17 noted
    17 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text7 noted
    7 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure3 noted
    3 of 17 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    2 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationOK
    All 17 pages keep their head tags in <head>, once each, under Googlebot's 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    17 of 17 indexable pages carry structured data: LocalBusiness (17), Organization (17), WebSite (17), Place (17), ImageObject (17). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 17 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 17 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions5 noted
    5 of 17 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    2 cookies set by the site; 18 response headers recorded across 206 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 17 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling8 noted
    8 words an English dictionary does not know, on 2 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2627 sites, median 80%, average 78%

royalloopvet.com scores 87%, higher than 79% of the 2627 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0611210%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 5 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 5 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 8 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 10 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 15 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 39 sites67%: 39 sites68%: 37 sites69%: 48 sites70%: 48 sites71%: 74 sites72%: 73 sites73%: 79 sites74%: 76 sites75%: 84 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 106 sites78%: 118 sites79%: 106 sites80%: 121 sites81%: 116 sites82%: 120 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 120 sites85%: 98 sites86%: 87 sites87%: 87 sites88%: 71 sites89%: 72 sites90%: 48 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 41 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 21 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 16 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The site has a good health score with some manageable issues. Focus on improving redirects, status codes, title tags, and reducing heavy assets for enhanced performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirect Issues

    Why: 19 URLs are redirecting, causing potential user confusion and impacting SEO.

    How: Identify unnecessary redirects and update or remove them to directly link to the correct URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Address Non-200 Status Codes

    Why: 23 URLs are returning non-200 responses, indicating potential access problems.

    How: Update the content or server settings for the affected pages to ensure they return a 200 status.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 5 pages have title issues, which may affect visibility in search results.

    How: Revise the title tags to be unique and under 60 characters for better SEO performance.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Reduce Heavy Assets

    Why: 17 assets are over 500 KB, which may slow down page loading times.

    How: Compress images and minimize stylesheet files as per the attached tasks to enhance loading speed.

    Evidence: 102 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 17 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    17 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

  5. 5

    Further Optimize Additional Heavy Assets

    Why: More heavy assets exist that might impede performance.

    How: Implement further compression or optimization for the assets listed in the remaining attached tasks.

    Evidence: 59.2 KB of stylesheet, loaded by 17 pages, so every visitor to any of them downloads it.

    17 pages affected

    Depends on: If it is a download rather than part of the page, weight matters less; move it out of the page instead.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website royalloopvet.com has critical security issues, including the absence of a Content Security Policy and protective cookie flags. This makes the site vulnerable to various attacks. Ensure that recommended headers and cookie settings are implemented promptly to mitigate risks.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a Content Security Policy, the website is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks.

    Fix: Add a Content-Security-Policy header: `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';`.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Cookies Missing Protection FlagsMedium

    Why it matters: Cookies lacking Secure, HttpOnly, and SameSite flags can be accessed by scripts or transmitted over insecure connections.

    Fix: Set cookies with flags: `Secure; HttpOnly; SameSite=Strict;` when creating each cookie.

    Evidence: Cookie flags

  3. 3

    Absence of Referrer PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Not specifying a Referrer-Policy exposes the full URL, including sensitive data, to external sites.

    Fix: Add a Referrer-Policy header: `Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade`.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 17 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://royalloopvet.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/about-royal-loop-vet-clinic/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/veterinarian-calgary-ab/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/calgary-ab-veterinary-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/royal-loop-vet-clinic-payment-options/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/calgary-ab-veterinary-jobs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/privacy-policy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/accessibility-statement/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/pet-dental-care-consultation-and-surgery-calgary-ab/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/pet-in-house-laboratory-calgary-ab/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://royalloopvet.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/about-royal-loop-vet-clinic/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/veterinarian-calgary-ab/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/calgary-ab-veterinary-services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/royal-loop-vet-clinic-payment-options/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/faqs/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/calgary-ab-veterinary-jobs/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/contact/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/privacy-policy/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/accessibility-statement/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/pet-dental-care-consultation-and-surgery-calgary-ab/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://royalloopvet.com/pet-in-house-laboratory-calgary-ab/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundCookie flagsMedium

    4 of 6 cookies are missing protective flags. Without HttpOnly a script can read the cookie; without Secure it travels over plain HTTP; without SameSite it is sent on cross-site requests.

    • 02 Nov 2026 14:00:34 GMT (set by https://royalloopvet.com/wp-content/plugins/wpforms/assets/pro/css/fields/img/f…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 14:01:38 GMT (set by https://royalloopvet.com/wp-content/plugins/wpforms/assets/pro/css/fields/img/f…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 16:05:49 GMT (set by https://royalloopvet.com/wp-content/plugins/wpforms/assets/pro/css/integrations…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
    • 02 Nov 2026 16:06:41 GMT (set by https://royalloopvet.com/wp-content/plugins/wpforms/assets/pro/css/integrations…) lacks Secure, HttpOnly, SameSite
  • NoteSoftware version disclosure

    Responses name the framework in an X-Powered-By header but hide the version.

    • server: cloudflare (206 responses)
    • x-powered-by: WP Engine (39 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 1 other domain without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (17 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 17 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKPermissions policy

    permissions-policy is set on all 17 HTML pages.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    18 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near royalloopvet.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling royalloopvet.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own royalloopvet.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming royalloopvet.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.