Scanned sites / rosetuxedoaz.com

SEO report for rosetuxedoaz.com DR 9

The latest Site Spider scan of rosetuxedoaz.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/rosetuxedoaz-com/2026-09-14-0300.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 03:00:01 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 04:38:11 UTC. Found on page 1 of chatgpt for browser (api usage) results

Site: https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

78/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 1127 pages and 1955 assets of rosetuxedoaz.com, starting from https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/. It scored 78 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (215), sitemap coverage (708), meta descriptions (520); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−4.6), meta descriptions (−4.5). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
1127
Assets fetched
1955
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

3,082 of 3,082 discovered URLs were fetched, 10,174 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 322 link destinations on other sites were checked, 117 left unchecked.

  • Title tags282 issues
    282 of 708 pages have title issues. 220 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3 points
  • Meta descriptions520 issues
    520 of 708 pages have meta description issues. 220 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • Headings124 issues
    124 of 708 pages have heading issues. 220 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −0.8 points
  • Broken links9 issues
    38 internal links point at 9 broken URLs.
    −0.2 points
  • Links to other sites44 issues
    44 destinations answered with an error, 134 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), 117 were left unchecked by the per-scan cap, of 300 destinations checked.
    −1.9 points
  • Redirects189 issues
    190 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.8 points
  • Non-200 responses10 issues
    201 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 199 of them are pages, 10 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.1 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 709 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 219 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt text8 issues
    8 of 5019 image references have no alt attribute. 3063 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets215 issues
    215 assets larger than 500 KB among 1955 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage708 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 708 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.6 points
  • Internal link counts365 noted
    Internal link counts for 500 pages; 365 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 708 pages have fewer than 200 words. 220 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate content10 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.1 points
  • URL format44 noted
    44 of 1127 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals220 noted
    220 of 928 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives928 noted
    928 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text332 noted
    332 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure176 noted
    176 of 708 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 220 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length142 noted
    138 images over 100 KB; 4 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 928 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 3082 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 928 pages; 884 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 55 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2858 sites, median 80%, average 79%

rosetuxedoaz.com scores 78%, higher than 39% of the 2858 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 75 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 108 sites78%: 131 sites79%: 110 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 120 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 107 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 94 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 74 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites78% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several site issues need attention to enhance SEO performance. Prioritize fixing broken links, improving title tags, and addressing meta descriptions for better visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Fixing 38 broken internal links will improve user experience and reduce crawl errors.

    How: Identify broken URLs and update or remove relevant links on the affected pages.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: 279 pages have title issues; correcting these can enhance rankings and click-through rates.

    How: Review and shorten overly long titles and create unique titles for pages with missing or identical titles.

    Checks: titles

  3. 3

    Create Missing Meta Descriptions

    Why: 358 pages lack meta descriptions; this hinders search engine understanding and indexing.

    How: Add unique, compelling meta descriptions for each affected page, focusing on target keywords.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  4. 4

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 201 URLs returning non-2xx status can harm SEO and user experience.

    How: Identify problematic URLs and correct server configurations or remove them if they no longer exist.

    Checks: status-codes

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: 124 pages exhibit heading issues; correcting these helps with content structure and SEO.

    How: Check pages for multiple H1 tags and ensure only one per page; use H2 and H3 for subheadings.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: 1 sitemap should list all important URLs to ensure discoverability.

    How: Generate a new sitemap that includes all crawled pages and submit it to search engines.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The security review for rosetuxedoaz.com identifies several key areas for improvement including the lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security and Content Security Policy. Immediate actions are needed to reduce security risks related to user data interception and script execution. Addressing these issues will enhance your site's protection against various web vulnerabilities.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: HSTS prevents man-in-the-middle attacks by ensuring browsers only communicate over HTTPS.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without CSP, your site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header allows clickjacking attacks where other sites may overlay their content over yours.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript Library DetectedMedium

    Why it matters: Bootstrap 3.3.7 contains known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade Bootstrap to version 3.4.1 or higher.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: This header helps prevent browsers from interpreting files as a different MIME type, which can lead to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  6. 6

    Mixed Content IssuesLow

    Why it matters: Loading HTTP resources on HTTPS pages can compromise the security of the site.

    Fix: Change all HTTP resource URLs to HTTPS or remove them if not needed.

    Evidence: Mixed content

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/prom-vest-bow-tie-style-trends/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-builder/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/measurements/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxshirts/tuxedo-shoes/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/tuxedo-now/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/arizona-tuxedo-rentals/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-suits-for-sale/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/wedding-faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/why-choose-rosetuxedo/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 928 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/prom-vest-bow-tie-style-trends/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-builder/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/measurements/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxshirts/tuxedo-shoes/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/tuxedo-now/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/arizona-tuxedo-rentals/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-suits-for-sale/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/wedding-faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/why-choose-rosetuxedo/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/prom-vest-bow-tie-style-trends/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-builder/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/measurements/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxshirts/tuxedo-shoes/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/tuxedo-now/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/arizona-tuxedo-rentals/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-suits-for-sale/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/wedding-faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/why-choose-rosetuxedo/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/prom-vest-bow-tie-style-trends/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-builder/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/measurements/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxshirts/tuxedo-shoes/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/about-us/tuxedo-now/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/arizona-tuxedo-rentals/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/tuxedo-suits-for-sale/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/wedding-faqs/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/why-choose-rosetuxedo/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundMixed contentLow

    253 resources on HTTPS pages are loaded over plain HTTP.

    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/wedding-tuxedo-and-suits-rentals/ loads image http://seal-central-northern-western-arizona.bbb.org/seals/blue-seal-200-42-bbb-27008488.…
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/vests/ loads image http://rosetuxedoaz.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Picture-2716-e1404267922977-225x300.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/davids2.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/colors/guava_sm.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/colors/watermelon_sm.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/colors/apple_sm.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/colors/pink_sm.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/colors/persimmon_sm.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/colors/rose_petal_sm.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/colors/sangria_sm.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/colors/tangerine_sm.jpg
    • https://rosetuxedoaz.com/coordinate-with-any-color/ loads image http://tuxedogallery.net/images/stories/colors/canary_sm.jpg
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: Bootstrap 3.3.7. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • Bootstrap 3.3.7 in https://rosetuxedoaz.com/wp-content/plugins/arlo-training-and-event-management-…: CVE-2016-10735, CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 3.4.1
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • img1.wsimg.com (40 script tags)
    • wwcdn.weddingwire.com (1 script tag)
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 928 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of rosetuxedoaz.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near rosetuxedoaz.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling rosetuxedoaz.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own rosetuxedoaz.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming rosetuxedoaz.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.