Scanned sites / roofkeepers.com / 2026-11-01-1311

roofkeepers.com scan from 2026-11-01 13:11:56 UTC DR 2

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-11-01-1311

Scanned 2026-11-01 13:11:56 UTC, finished 2026-11-01 13:28:32 UTC. Found on page 1 of brave web search results

Site: https://roofkeepers.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

48/ 100Poor

On November 1, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 119 pages and 173 assets of roofkeepers.com, starting from https://roofkeepers.com/. It scored 48 out of 100, a poor result. 10 of 33 checks found something to fix, led by broken links (35), non-200 responses (35), heavy assets (18); 14 checks passed. Most of the points went to broken links (−16.7), non-200 responses (−8.3), heavy assets (−6). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 4 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 3 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
119
Assets fetched
173
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
10 of 33
CoverageComplete crawl

292 of 294 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags10 issues
    10 of 42 pages have title issues.
    −2.4 points
  • Meta descriptions27 issues
    27 of 42 pages have meta description issues.
    −5.1 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 42 pages have heading issues.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken links35 issues
    70 internal links point at 35 broken URLs.
    −16.7 points
  • Links to other sites162 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 6 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
  • Redirects46 issues
    43 redirecting URLs, 7 of them chained.
    −4 points
  • Non-200 responses35 issues
    78 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 77 of them are pages, 35 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −8.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 42 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 2625 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets18 issues
    18 assets larger than 500 KB among 173 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages35 issues
    35 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −3.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage35 issues
    2 sitemaps listing 42 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 35 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 42 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content3 issues
    3 of 42 pages have fewer than 200 words.
    −0.6 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 119 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 42 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives42 noted
    42 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 42 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies33 noted
    33 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validation42 noted
    42 of 42 pages have HTML problems: 0 with head tags outside <head>, 0 over 2 MB.
  • hreflangOK
    No page declares hreflang.
  • Structured dataOK
    42 of 42 indexable pages carry structured data: BreadcrumbList (42), ListItem (42), WebSite (42), Organization (42), WebPage (42). 0 pages with errors a rich result would fail on.
  • Near duplicatesOK
    No near duplicates among 39 pages with enough text to compare.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 42 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positions6 noted
    6 of 7 linked pages are linked only from the template, never from another page's content.
  • PaginationOK
    No page declares rel=next or rel=prev pagination.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 292 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 42 pages; 35 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • Spelling6 noted
    6 words an English dictionary does not know, on 12 pages. Product names and jargon will appear here too.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2708 sites, median 80%, average 78%

roofkeepers.com scores 48%, higher than 1% of the 2708 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0641270%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 6 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 10 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 7 sites57%: 16 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 40 sites67%: 40 sites68%: 39 sites69%: 50 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 78 sites72%: 74 sites73%: 82 sites74%: 77 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 96 sites77%: 107 sites78%: 123 sites79%: 109 sites80%: 124 sites81%: 120 sites82%: 123 sites83%: 118 sites84%: 127 sites85%: 102 sites86%: 91 sites87%: 91 sites88%: 77 sites89%: 72 sites90%: 53 sites91%: 56 sites92%: 40 sites93%: 28 sites94%: 23 sites95%: 14 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 15 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 77 sites48% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

The website has significant issues, particularly with broken links and redirects, which need immediate attention. Focus on fixing broken links and content-related problems for better user experience and SEO performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 70 internal links lead to broken URLs, impacting user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove links pointing to 404 pages such as algae-mildew-removal and attic-insulation.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Eliminate Redirects

    Why: 43 URLs redirect, 7 being chained, which can slow down site loading speed.

    How: Streamline redirects by fixing direct URLs to avoid unnecessary hops, such as cleaning up http to https transitions.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: 78 URLs do not return a 2xx response, hindering access to content.

    How: Fix URLs returning errors, particularly the redirect issues and 404s.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: 10 pages have title tag issues, which can affect search visibility.

    How: Revise titles for duplication or length, ensuring they are unique and within pixel limits.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: 27 meta descriptions are too long or missing; this affects click-through rates.

    How: Shorten descriptions to under 160 characters while ensuring they accurately reflect page content.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Shrink Heavy Assets

    Why: 18 assets exceed 500 KB, slowing down load times.

    How: Optimize images and scripts to reduce file sizes, using compression and appropriate formats.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website roofkeepers.com lacks important security headers, which may expose it to various risks, including clickjacking, MIME type confusion, and information leakage. Implementing the suggested fixes will enhance your site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 3 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of HSTS allows potential interception of requests when users type the address without HTTPS.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to your server responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Absence of this header enables clickjacking attacks where your site can be embedded in frames from other domains.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to your server responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers might incorrectly execute files as scripts based on their contents instead of their type.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to your server responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Missing Referrer-PolicyLow

    Why it matters: Without this policy, sensitive URLs may be sent to external sites when visitors click through links.

    Fix: Add 'Referrer-Policy: no-referrer-when-downgrade' to your server responses.

    Evidence: Referrer policy

  5. 5

    Server Banner DisclosureLow

    Why it matters: Revealing your server version can aid attackers in finding vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Consider hiding or changing the server banners, especially 'Server' and 'X-Powered-By' headers.

    Evidence: Software version disclosure

  6. 6

    Missing Permissions-PolicyInfo

    Why it matters: This policy helps control browser features that could be exploited by injected scripts.

    Fix: Add 'Permissions-Policy: the features you don't use' to your server responses.

    Evidence: Permissions policy

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://roofkeepers.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-financing-fargo-nd/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-estimate-fargo-nd/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/recent-roofing-projects/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/privacy-policy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/terms-conditions/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/asphalt-roof-replacement-fargo-nd/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-maxx-fargo-nd/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://roofkeepers.com/gutter-cleaning-fargo-nd-2/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://roofkeepers.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-financing-fargo-nd/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-estimate-fargo-nd/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/recent-roofing-projects/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/terms-conditions/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/asphalt-roof-replacement-fargo-nd/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-maxx-fargo-nd/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/gutter-cleaning-fargo-nd-2/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://roofkeepers.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-financing-fargo-nd/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-estimate-fargo-nd/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/recent-roofing-projects/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/privacy-policy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/terms-conditions/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/asphalt-roof-replacement-fargo-nd/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-maxx-fargo-nd/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://roofkeepers.com/gutter-cleaning-fargo-nd-2/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundReferrer policyLow

    No HTML page sends referrer-policy. Without a Referrer-Policy the full page address, including any query string, is sent to every site a visitor clicks through to.

    • https://roofkeepers.com/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-financing-fargo-nd/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-estimate-fargo-nd/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/recent-roofing-projects/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/about/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/privacy-policy/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/terms-conditions/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/services/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/contact/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/asphalt-roof-replacement-fargo-nd/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-maxx-fargo-nd/ → no referrer-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/gutter-cleaning-fargo-nd-2/ → no referrer-policy
  • FoundPermissions policyInfo

    No HTML page sends permissions-policy. A Permissions-Policy header turns off browser features the site does not use (camera, microphone, geolocation), limiting what an injected script could do.

    • https://roofkeepers.com/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-financing-fargo-nd/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-estimate-fargo-nd/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/recent-roofing-projects/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/about/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/privacy-policy/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/terms-conditions/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/services/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/contact/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/asphalt-roof-replacement-fargo-nd/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/roof-maxx-fargo-nd/ → no permissions-policy
    • https://roofkeepers.com/gutter-cleaning-fargo-nd-2/ → no permissions-policy
  • FoundSoftware version disclosureLow

    Responses reveal the exact server or framework version, which lets an attacker look up known vulnerabilities for it without guessing.

    • server: hcdn (292 responses)
    • x-powered-by: PHP/8.2.35 (114 responses)
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • js.adsrvr.org (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (32 script tags)
8 checks passed, 1 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 42 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    2 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    The crawl set no cookies, so there are no cookie flags to check.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near roofkeepers.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling roofkeepers.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own roofkeepers.com?