Scanned sites / riverstonespa.ca

SEO report for riverstonespa.ca DR 29

The latest Site Spider scan of riverstonespa.ca, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/riverstonespa-ca/2026-09-14-0933.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-14 09:33:32 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 10:04:06 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://riverstonespa.ca/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

81/ 100Good

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 301 pages and 1001 assets of riverstonespa.ca, starting from https://riverstonespa.ca/. It scored 81 out of 100, a good result. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (21), meta descriptions (177), sitemap coverage (179); 5 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−4.9), sitemap coverage (−3.7). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium5 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
301
Assets fetched
1001
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,302 of 1,302 discovered URLs were fetched, 1,043 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 56 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags55 issues
    55 of 179 pages have title issues. 110 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.9 points
  • Meta descriptions177 issues
    177 of 179 pages have meta description issues. 110 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.9 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 179 pages have heading issues. 110 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links5 issues
    5 internal links point at 5 broken URLs.
    −0.3 points
  • Links to other sites40 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 39 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 56 destinations checked.
  • Redirects7 issues
    8 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses5 issues
    13 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 12 of them are pages, 5 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.2 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability7 issues
    7 of 287 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 2 pages noindex by design.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt text8 issues
    8 of 1787 image references have no alt attribute. 1202 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets21 issues
    21 assets larger than 500 KB among 1001 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages1 issue
    1 page have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage179 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 179 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −3.7 points
  • Internal link counts102 noted
    Internal link counts for 289 pages; 102 worth a look.
  • Thin content56 issues
    56 of 179 pages have fewer than 200 words. 110 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.6 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format111 noted
    111 of 301 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals109 noted
    109 of 289 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives289 noted
    289 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text138 noted
    138 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure120 noted
    120 of 179 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 110 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length45 noted
    44 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 289 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 1302 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 289 pages; 173 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 63 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2866 sites, median 80%, average 79%

riverstonespa.ca scores 81%, higher than 52% of the 2866 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751490%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 42 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 79 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 127 sites81%: 124 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 105 sites86%: 96 sites87%: 95 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 76 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 58 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 17 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 7 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 149 sites81% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

The site has several SEO issues, including broken links, improper redirects, and missing title tags. Addressing these will improve user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Improves user experience and avoids 404 errors.

    How: Update or remove links to the broken URLs found in the crawl.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Correct Redirects

    Why: Reduces potential SEO issues and improves page load times.

    How: Ensure all URLs redirect to the correct final destination. In some cases, consolidate 301s.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Fixes pages that don't return valid status codes, enhancing crawlability.

    How: Investigate the 13 URLs and resolve the issues causing non-200 statuses.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Enhanced title tags provide better context for search engines.

    How: Revise the 55 affected title tags to be descriptive and within the 30-60 character limit.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: A well-written meta description can improve click-through rates.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions for the 177 pages lacking them, keeping them concise.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensures all relevant pages are indexed by search engines.

    How: Add the missed 179 pages to your sitemap.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security vulnerabilities that need to be addressed, including the absence of security headers and outdated libraries. Implementing these changes will help protect user data and improve overall site security.

  • 0 high
  • 5 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors may be intercepted on their first request if they use HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload' to all responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Absence of CSP allows unrestricted loading of scripts, styles, and frames, increasing risk of attacks.

    Fix: Implement a CSP header such as 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';' on all pages.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options for Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Pages can be embedded in other sites, exposing users to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: DENY' to all HTML responses to prevent framing.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Outdated jQuery Version with VulnerabilitiesMedium

    Why it matters: Using jQuery 2.10.5 exposes your site to known vulnerabilities.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or higher to address these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A public API key can be misused, leading to service disruptions or charges.

    Fix: Restrict the Google API key by HTTP referrer in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  6. 6

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers can misinterpret file types and execute malicious files.

    Fix: Include the header 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' in all HTML responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://riverstonespa.ca/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/gift-card/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/group-bookings/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/couples-services/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/massage-therapy/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/skincare/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/hand-foot/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/body-treatments/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/package-services/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 289 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://riverstonespa.ca/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/gift-card/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/group-bookings/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/couples-services/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/massage-therapy/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/skincare/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/hand-foot/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/body-treatments/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/package-services/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://riverstonespa.ca/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/gift-card/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/group-bookings/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/couples-services/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/massage-therapy/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/skincare/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/hand-foot/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/body-treatments/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/package-services/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://riverstonespa.ca/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/gift-card/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/blog/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/group-bookings/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/couples-services/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/massage-therapy/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/skincare/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/hand-foot/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/body-treatments/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://riverstonespa.ca/package-services/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 2.10.5. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 2.10.5 in https://riverstonespa.ca/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/js/placeholders.jquery…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…Bs (39 chars) in https://riverstonespa.ca/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.google.com (43 script tags)
    • www.bugherd.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • gateway.moneris.com (40 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 289 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    49 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of riverstonespa.ca

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near riverstonespa.ca

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling riverstonespa.ca from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own riverstonespa.ca?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming riverstonespa.ca. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.