Scanned sites / renoteckroofing.com / 2026-09-12-0026

renoteckroofing.com scan from 2026-09-12 00:26:56 UTC DR 21

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-0026

Scanned 2026-09-12 00:26:56 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 05:09:01 UTC

Site: https://renoteckroofing.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

79/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 166 pages and 1000 assets of renoteckroofing.com, starting from https://renoteckroofing.com/. It scored 79 out of 100, a good result. 7 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (124), heavy assets (38), sitemap coverage (155); 10 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−6.1), heavy assets (−6), sitemap coverage (−5.7). 9 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
166
Assets fetched
1000
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
7 of 26
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

1,166 of 1,166 discovered URLs were fetched, 19 left out by the 5,000-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 13 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags52 issues
    52 of 155 pages have title issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.2 points
  • Meta descriptions124 issues
    124 of 155 pages have meta description issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −6.1 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 155 pages have heading issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 8 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 13 destinations checked.
    −0.3 points
  • Redirects4 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses5 noted
    5 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 155 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 7 pages noindex by design.
    −0.1 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 234 image references have no alt attribute. 192 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets38 issues
    38 assets larger than 500 KB among 1000 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage155 issues
    1 sitemap listing 0 URLs: 155 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.7 points
  • Internal link counts162 noted
    Internal link counts for 162 pages; 162 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 155 pages have fewer than 200 words. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 166 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals7 noted
    7 of 162 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives162 noted
    162 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure13 noted
    13 of 155 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length131 noted
    131 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies2 noted
    2 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 162 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 1166 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 162 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2337 sites, median 79%, average 78%

renoteckroofing.com scores 79%, higher than 47% of the 2337 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 109 sites81%: 104 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 87 sites86%: 71 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 58 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites79% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several SEO issues that can improve visibility and user experience. Prioritize fixing redirects, status codes, title tags, and meta descriptions, alongside sitemap updates, for better indexation and relevance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Eliminate chained redirects to improve loading speed and user experience.

    How: Redirect directly from old URLs to their final destinations instead of through intermediate URLs.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Address URLs that return errors to ensure users access the correct pages.

    How: Check the listed URLs and ensure they return a 200 status code. Remove unnecessary redirects.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Correcting title issues boosts relevance and click-through rates.

    How: Revise titles to keep them within 50-60 characters, ensuring they accurately reflect page content.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Well-written meta descriptions improve click rates from search results.

    How: Edit meta descriptions to be concise (150-160 characters), summarizing each page's purpose effectively.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Update Sitemap Coverage

    Why: Ensure all relevant pages are indexed by listing them in the sitemap.

    How: Add crawled pages that are missing from the sitemap to ensure search engines can discover them.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

  6. 6

    Optimize Heavy Assets

    Why: Reduce load times to improve user experience and rankings.

    How: Compress or resize large images and videos over 500 KB to enhance site speed.

    Checks: heavy-assets

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website has several security issues that could expose it to various risks. Key concerns include the absence of essential security headers, which protect against common attacks. Additionally, a sensitive Google API key was found in the source code. Immediate action is needed to enhance the site's security posture.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, visitors can be intercepted when accessing the site via HTTP.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, the site is vulnerable to script injection attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    No Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows the site to be embedded in a frame on potentially malicious sites.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Leaked Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: Exposes the API key to unauthorized use, potentially incurring costs or limiting functionality.

    Fix: Restrict the API key by HTTP referrer in Google Cloud Console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  5. 5

    Missing MIME Sniffing Protection (X-Content-Type-Options)Low

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers may improperly execute files, leading to security risks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://renoteckroofing.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/about/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/standing-seam/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-shingle-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/custom-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-cladding-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/commercial-metal-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/industrial-metal-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/commercial-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/emergency-roofing/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/asphalt-shingles/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 162 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://renoteckroofing.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/about/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/standing-seam/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-shingle-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/custom-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-cladding-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/commercial-metal-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/industrial-metal-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/commercial-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/emergency-roofing/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/asphalt-shingles/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://renoteckroofing.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/about/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/standing-seam/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-shingle-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/custom-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-cladding-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/commercial-metal-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/industrial-metal-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/commercial-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/emergency-roofing/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/asphalt-shingles/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://renoteckroofing.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/about/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/standing-seam/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-shingle-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/custom-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-cladding-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/metal-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/commercial-metal-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/services/industrial-metal-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/commercial-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/emergency-roofing/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://renoteckroofing.com/additionals/asphalt-shingles/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…aw (39 chars) in https://renoteckroofing.com/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • static.elfsight.com (40 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (33 script tags)
    • challenges.cloudflare.com (40 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 4 paths that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /cgi-bin
    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
    • Disallow: /wp-includes/
    • Disallow: /wp-login.php
5 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 162 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    81 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    No recognisable library versions were found in the sampled scripts.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near renoteckroofing.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling renoteckroofing.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own renoteckroofing.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming renoteckroofing.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.