Scanned sites / qualityelectricnd.com

SEO report for qualityelectricnd.com DR 10

The latest Site Spider scan of qualityelectricnd.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/qualityelectricnd-com/2026-09-13-0247.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 02:47:26 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 03:01:22 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://qualityelectricnd.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

50/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 13 pages and 294 assets of qualityelectricnd.com, starting from https://qualityelectricnd.com/. It scored 50 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by broken links (6), non-200 responses (6), meta descriptions (7); 13 checks passed. Most of the points went to broken links (−17.1), non-200 responses (−8.6), meta descriptions (−8). 6 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
13
Assets fetched
294
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

307 of 307 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 6 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags4 issues
    4 of 7 pages have title issues.
    −5.7 points
  • Meta descriptions7 issues
    7 of 7 pages have meta description issues.
    −8 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 7 pages have heading issues.
    −1.7 points
  • Broken links6 issues
    14 internal links point at 6 broken URLs.
    −17.1 points
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 6 destinations checked.
    −0.4 points
  • Redirects1 noted
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses6 issues
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 6 of them are pages, 6 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −8.6 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 7 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 35 image references have no alt attribute. 14 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets8 issues
    8 assets larger than 500 KB among 294 fetched assets.
    −4.8 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    No sitemap found. Tried: https://qualityelectricnd.com/sitemap.xml (301), https://qualityelectricnd.com/sitemap_index.xml (403). Add one at /sitemap.xml or list it in robots.txt.
    −3.4 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 7 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 7 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 13 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 7 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives7 noted
    7 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure1 noted
    1 of 7 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length5 noted
    5 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 7 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 307 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 7 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 59 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%

qualityelectricnd.com scores 50%, higher than 2% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 117 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 46 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites50% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has several serious issues, including broken links, non-200 status responses, and missing elements like sitemaps. Address these to improve user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: 14 internal links currently point to broken URLs, harming user experience.

    How: Identify and correct or remove these links to ensure all internal navigation works.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 8 URLs are returning errors, affecting accessibility and potentially ranking.

    How: Investigate each URL and either correct issues or remove references.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Shorten Title Tags

    Why: 4 pages have overly long title tags which can affect search engine display.

    How: Revise titles to under 60 characters for optimal length and clarity.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Several meta descriptions are too long, limiting their effectiveness in SERPs.

    How: Edit meta descriptions to keep them under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add H1 Headings

    Why: 2 pages are missing or have multiple H1s, which is critical for SEO structure.

    How: Ensure each page has a single, relevant H1 heading for clarity.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Create a Sitemap

    Why: No sitemap found, which helps with indexing and site visibility.

    How: Create a sitemap.xml file and ensure it's accessible at /sitemap.xml.

    Checks: sitemap-coverage

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website qualityelectricnd.com has some security concerns. The Content Security Policy allows potentially harmful inline and eval scripts, which diminishes its protective capabilities. Additionally, third-party scripts lack Subresource Integrity, increasing vulnerability risks. The robots.txt file reveals private paths that could expose sensitive information.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Weak Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: The CSP permits 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval', which can expose the site to script injections.

    Fix: Update the Content Security Policy to disallow 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'. Example: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-party scripts without Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Scripts from external domains can be compromised, leading to potential attacks.

    Fix: Implement Subresource Integrity for third-party scripts, or use a CSP to restrict their domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt exposes the path to the admin panel, which can assist attackers.

    Fix: Implement proper access controls for the /wp-admin/ path instead of relying on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • NoteContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set, but it allows inline or eval scripts ('unsafe-inline' / 'unsafe-eval'), which removes most of its protection against injected scripts.

    • https://qualityelectricnd.com/ → default-src * data: mediastream: blob: filesystem: about: ws: wss: 'unsafe-eval' 'wasm-unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline';
    • https://qualityelectricnd.com/services/ → default-src * data: mediastream: blob: filesystem: about: ws: wss: 'unsafe-eval' 'wasm-unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline';
    • https://qualityelectricnd.com/about/ → default-src * data: mediastream: blob: filesystem: about: ws: wss: 'unsafe-eval' 'wasm-unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline';
    • https://qualityelectricnd.com/careers/ → default-src * data: mediastream: blob: filesystem: about: ws: wss: 'unsafe-eval' 'wasm-unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline';
    • https://qualityelectricnd.com/contact/ → default-src * data: mediastream: blob: filesystem: about: ws: wss: 'unsafe-eval' 'wasm-unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline';
    • https://qualityelectricnd.com/careers/apprentice-electrician/ → default-src * data: mediastream: blob: filesystem: about: ws: wss: 'unsafe-eval' 'wasm-unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline';
    • https://qualityelectricnd.com/employment-application/ → default-src * data: mediastream: blob: filesystem: about: ws: wss: 'unsafe-eval' 'wasm-unsafe-eval' 'unsafe-inline';
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 3 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • fd.cleantalk.org (7 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (7 script tags)
    • www.google.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 7 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 7 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 7 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 7 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    5 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    2 library versions recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of qualityelectricnd.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near qualityelectricnd.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling qualityelectricnd.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own qualityelectricnd.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming qualityelectricnd.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.