Scanned sites / providencenucca.com

SEO report for providencenucca.com DR 23

The latest Site Spider scan of providencenucca.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/providencenucca-com/2026-09-13-1032.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 10:32:22 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 11:21:23 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://providencenucca.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

82/ 100Good

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 102 pages and 281 assets of providencenucca.com, starting from https://providencenucca.com/. It scored 82 out of 100, a good result. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (64), meta descriptions (68), links to other sites (4); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−6.7), meta descriptions (−5.7), links to other sites (−1.6). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
102
Assets fetched
281
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

383 of 383 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 64 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags64 issues
    64 of 95 pages have title issues.
    −6.7 points
  • Meta descriptions68 issues
    68 of 95 pages have meta description issues.
    −5.7 points
  • Headings8 issues
    8 of 95 pages have heading issues.
    −0.5 points
  • Broken links3 issues
    3 internal links point at 3 broken URLs.
    −0.6 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 29 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 64 destinations checked.
    −1.6 points
  • Redirects4 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 1 of them chained.
    −0.2 points
  • Non-200 responses3 issues
    8 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 7 of them are pages, 3 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 95 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
  • Image alt text95 issues
    95 of 867 image references have no alt attribute. 168 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −0.7 points
  • Heavy assets1 issue
    1 asset larger than 500 KB among 281 fetched assets.
    −0.6 points
  • Orphan pages8 issues
    8 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage15 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 92 URLs: 5 crawled pages missing, 1 listed URL broken or redirecting, 9 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.9 points
  • Internal link counts20 noted
    Internal link counts for 95 pages; 20 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 95 pages have fewer than 200 words.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 102 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 95 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives94 noted
    94 pages carry a robots directive; 1 carries none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure13 noted
    13 of 95 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better.
  • Image weight and alt length40 noted
    40 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 95 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 12 response headers recorded across 383 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 95 pages; 59 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 73 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

providencenucca.com scores 82%, higher than 56% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 130 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 95 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites82% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several critical SEO issues to address, including broken links, redirects, title/meta description problems, and unoptimized images. Fixing these will enhance usability and search engine visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Improve user experience and SEO.

    How: Update or remove links to URLs returning 404 errors.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Redirects

    Why: Eliminate unnecessary redirects for better crawling.

    How: Consolidate chained redirects and ensure direct linking to content.

    Checks: redirects

  3. 3

    Address Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensure all pages are accessible to users and crawlers.

    How: Fix or remove URLs returning non-200 status codes.

    Checks: status-codes

  4. 4

    Improve Title Tags

    Why: Optimize for search engines and improve click-through rates.

    How: Ensure all titles are under 60 characters and unique across pages.

    Checks: titles

  5. 5

    Enhance Meta Descriptions

    Why: Better visibility in search results.

    How: Create unique meta descriptions under 160 characters for affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  6. 6

    Add Image Alt Text

    Why: Increase accessibility and SEO for images.

    How: Add descriptive alt attributes for images without them.

    Checks: images-alt

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several security gaps that need to be addressed, including missing security headers and reliance on third-party scripts. Implementing these recommendations will help protect your site and users from various attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users accessing your site via HTTP can be intercepted during their first request.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload to all responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: The absence of a CSP allows resources to load from any origin, increasing the risk of cross-site scripting attacks.

    Fix: Include a Content-Security-Policy header, e.g., Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; script-src 'self' cdn.trustedsite.com cdnjs.cloudflare.com;

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Without this protection, your pages can be embedded in unauthorized iframes, making them susceptible to clickjacking attacks.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY to all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Lack Subresource Integrity (SRI)Low

    Why it matters: Using external scripts without SRI means any compromise of these hosts could inject malicious code into your site.

    Fix: Implement a Content-Security-Policy that specifies which external domains are trusted, potentially allowing for better control.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  5. 5

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file exposes sensitive paths that could guide malicious users while not providing real access restrictions.

    Fix: Consider improving access controls for the /wp-admin/ path and other sensitive directories instead of relying solely on robots.txt.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://providencenucca.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/meet-the-team/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/nucca-care/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/what-to-expect/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/results/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/reviews/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/faqs/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/blog/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/educational-video/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/results/headaches/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://providencenucca.com/results/leg-arm-pain/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 95 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://providencenucca.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/meet-the-team/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/nucca-care/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/what-to-expect/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/results/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/faqs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/educational-video/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/results/headaches/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://providencenucca.com/results/leg-arm-pain/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://providencenucca.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/meet-the-team/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/nucca-care/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/what-to-expect/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/results/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/reviews/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/faqs/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/blog/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/educational-video/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/results/headaches/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://providencenucca.com/results/leg-arm-pain/ → no x-frame-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • cdn.trustedsite.com (40 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (40 script tags)
    • cdn.trustindex.io (2 script tags)
    • img1.wsimg.com (40 script tags)
    • reputationhub.site (1 script tag)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 95 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 95 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    16 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of providencenucca.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near providencenucca.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling providencenucca.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own providencenucca.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming providencenucca.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.