Scanned sites / pioneerplumbingidaho.com

SEO report for pioneerplumbingidaho.com DR 0

The latest Site Spider scan of pioneerplumbingidaho.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/pioneerplumbingidaho-com/2026-09-13-1202.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-13 12:02:52 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 12:08:01 UTC. Found on page 3 of brave web search results

Site: https://pioneerplumbingidaho.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

73/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 11 pages and 66 assets of pioneerplumbingidaho.com, starting from https://pioneerplumbingidaho.com/. It scored 73 out of 100, a result that needs work. 9 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by indexability (6), meta descriptions (7), title tags (4); 7 checks passed. Most of the points went to indexability (−6), meta descriptions (−5.6), title tags (−4). 11 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Info1 info finding. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
11
Assets fetched
66
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

77 of 81 discovered URLs were fetched, 4 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 2 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags4 issues
    4 of 7 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4 points
  • Meta descriptions7 issues
    7 of 7 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.6 points
  • Headings4 issues
    4 of 7 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.4 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites1 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 1 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 2 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    2 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.4 points
  • Non-200 responses2 noted
    2 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability6 issues
    6 of 7 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design.
    −6 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 79 image references have no alt attribute. 79 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets2 issues
    2 assets larger than 500 KB among 66 fetched assets.
    −1.2 points
  • Orphan pages4 issues
    4 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −1.6 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 7 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 4 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −2.4 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 10 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin content4 issues
    4 of 7 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.2 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 11 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 10 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives10 noted
    10 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure2 noted
    2 of 7 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length19 noted
    19 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 10 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 77 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 10 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 72 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2348 sites, median 79%, average 78%

pioneerplumbingidaho.com scores 73%, higher than 26% of the 2348 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0571140%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 7 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 36 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 91 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 114 sites83%: 102 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 66 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 39 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 17 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites73% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your website has various SEO issues that need addressing to improve visibility and user experience. Focus on resolving these items for better performance.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Redirects can cause confusion and slow down page load times.

    How: Update the URLs to avoid unnecessary redirects, ensuring direct navigation to final destinations.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Non-200 responses can negatively affect user experience and SEO.

    How: Ensure all pages return a 200 status. Update or remove the problematic URLs.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Improper title tags can reduce click-through rates.

    How: Revise to ensure they are unique and under 60 characters, avoiding duplication.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions impact search rankings and click rates.

    How: Create concise descriptions under 160 characters that accurately describe each page.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Headings

    Why: Missing headings can affect content readability and SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has a unique H1 heading that describes the page's content.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Resolve Orphan Pages

    Why: Orphan pages cannot be accessed directly, limiting their reach.

    How: Add internal links to orphan pages from other relevant pages to improve visibility.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website's robots.txt file contains a path that appears private, which can expose sensitive areas of the site. Implement access controls to secure these areas effectively.

  • 0 high
  • 0 medium
  • 0 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Sensitive paths listed in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file publicly discloses sensitive paths, which could aid malicious users in probing the site.

    Fix: Revise the robots.txt file to ensure it does not disclose sensitive paths or consider implementing access controls to protect these resources.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
12 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 10 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 10 HTML pages.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 3 of 10 pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 10 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 10 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    6 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKThird-party scripts

    The sampled pages load no scripts from other domains.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of pioneerplumbingidaho.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near pioneerplumbingidaho.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling pioneerplumbingidaho.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own pioneerplumbingidaho.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming pioneerplumbingidaho.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.