Scanned sites / photoai.com / 2026-09-08-2021

photoai.com scan from 2026-09-08 20:21:28 UTC DR 66

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-08-2021

Scanned 2026-09-08 20:21:28 UTC, finished 2026-09-08 21:00:02 UTC

Site: https://photoai.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

72/ 100Needs work

On September 8, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 200 pages and 111 assets of photoai.com, starting from https://photoai.com/. It scored 72 out of 100, a result that needs work. 8 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (17), headings (192), meta descriptions (145); 11 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), meta descriptions (−5.8), headings (−5.8). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
200
Assets fetched
111
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
8 of 26
CoverageJob finished, partial coverage

311 of 311 discovered URLs were fetched, 42,666 left out by the 200-page and 1,000-asset budget. The job finished, but the crawl did not reach everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 19 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags72 issues
    72 of 192 pages have title issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.6 points
  • Meta descriptions145 issues
    145 of 192 pages have meta description issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.8 points
  • Headings192 issues
    192 of 192 pages have heading issues. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.8 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites683 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 5 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 19 destinations checked.
  • Redirects1 issue
    1 redirecting URL, 0 of them chained.
  • Non-200 responses1 noted
    1 URL did not return a 2xx response. 1 of them is a page, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability78 issues
    78 of 199 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −3.9 points
  • Image alt text17,480 issues
    17480 of 41515 image references have no alt attribute. 20631 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
    −2.5 points
  • Heavy assets17 issues
    17 assets larger than 500 KB among 111 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverage28 issues
    1 sitemap listing 5,000+ URLs (first 5,000 entries read): 28 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap. 4,836 listed URLs not crawled within the 200-page budget.
    −0.8 points
  • Internal link counts199 noted
    Internal link counts for 199 pages; 199 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 192 pages have fewer than 200 words. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format1 noted
    1 of 200 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals7 noted
    7 of 199 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directivesOK
    No page carries a robots directive; all 199 pages are open to search engines.
  • Anchor textOK
    Every internal link has descriptive, followed anchor text.
  • Title and heading structure144 noted
    144 of 192 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 7 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length30 noted
    29 images over 100 KB; 1 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 199 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 311 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 199 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2311 sites, median 79%, average 78%

photoai.com scores 72%, higher than 23% of the 2311 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581160%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 16 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 21 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 34 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 68 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 69 sites75%: 71 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 106 sites82%: 116 sites83%: 98 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 86 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 60 sites90%: 34 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 37 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 15 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 10 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites72% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Several key areas need attention to improve SEO performance, including redirects, title tags, meta descriptions, headings, indexability, and image alt text. These changes will enhance user experience and search rankings.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: Improve user experience and avoid unnecessary redirection.

    How: Redirect the URL https://photoai.com/?action=login-with-google&ref=&via=&template= directly to the intended page.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Ensure all pages return a valid response for better indexing.

    How: Fix the URL https://photoai.com/?action=login-with-google&ref=&via=&template= to provide a 2xx response.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Overlong titles can negatively impact visibility in search results.

    How: Shorten the titles for the 72 pages identified, ideally under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions help boost click-through rates from search results.

    How: Revise the meta descriptions for the 23 pages, ensuring they are concise and descriptive, less than 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Headings Structure

    Why: Proper heading structure aids in readability and SEO.

    How: Review all page headings to ensure only one H1 per page and follow a logical hierarchy.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Add Alt Text to Images

    Why: Image alt text enhances accessibility and SEO.

    How: Provide descriptive alt text for the 17,480 images missing attributes.

    Checks: images-alt

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several missing security headers that can increase vulnerability to attacks such as clickjacking and cross-site scripting. Implementing these headers will enhance your site's defenses.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Your site lacks a Content-Security-Policy header, leaving it open to content injection attacks.

    Fix: Add a header: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Lack of Clickjacking ProtectionMedium

    Why it matters: Without X-Frame-Options, malicious sites can embed your pages in frames, potentially tricking users.

    Fix: Add a header: X-Frame-Options: DENY.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    No MIME Sniffing ProtectionLow

    Why it matters: Absence of X-Content-Type-Options allows browsers to potentially execute files as scripts based on content.

    Fix: Add a header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  4. 4

    Third-party Scripts Without SRILow

    Why it matters: Scripts loaded from external domains lack Subresource Integrity, risking functionality if those scripts are compromised.

    Fix: Consider implementing a Content-Security-Policy or adding SRI for these scripts.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 199 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://photoai.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/ai-dating-photos → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/tinder → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/hinge → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/badoo → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/bumble → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/hard-flash → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/glamour → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/swimsuit → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/mocha-mousse-outfits → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/beach-bikini → no content-security-policy
    • https://photoai.com/cloud-dancer-outfits → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://photoai.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/ai-dating-photos → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/tinder → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/hinge → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/badoo → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/bumble → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/hard-flash → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/glamour → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/swimsuit → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/mocha-mousse-outfits → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/beach-bikini → no x-frame-options
    • https://photoai.com/cloud-dancer-outfits → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://photoai.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/ai-dating-photos → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/tinder → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/hinge → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/badoo → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/bumble → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/hard-flash → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/glamour → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/swimsuit → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/mocha-mousse-outfits → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/beach-bikini → no x-content-type-options
    • https://photoai.com/cloud-dancer-outfits → no x-content-type-options
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • accounts.google.com (40 script tags)
    • sa.photoai.com (40 script tags)
    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • ajax.googleapis.com (40 script tags)
8 checks passed, 4 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 199 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 199 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableForms over HTTPS

    No forms were found on the sampled pages.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near photoai.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling photoai.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own photoai.com?