Scanned sites / petvet.org / 2026-09-12-0121

petvet.org scan from 2026-09-12 01:21:56 UTC DR 4

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-12-0121

Scanned 2026-09-12 01:21:56 UTC, finished 2026-09-12 03:17:35 UTC

Site: https://petvet.org/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

87/ 100Good

On September 12, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 43 pages and 431 assets of petvet.org, starting from https://petvet.org/. It scored 87 out of 100, a good result. 9 of 26 checks found something to fix, led by heavy assets (43), title tags (13), links to other sites (3); 9 checks passed. Most of the points went to heavy assets (−6), title tags (−3.3), links to other sites (−1.2). 8 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 11 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium1 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
43
Assets fetched
431
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
9 of 26
CoverageComplete crawl

474 of 474 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 25 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags13 issues
    13 of 39 pages have title issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −3.3 points
  • Meta descriptions3 issues
    3 of 39 pages have meta description issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.6 points
  • Headings2 issues
    2 of 39 pages have heading issues. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
    −0.3 points
  • Broken linksOK
    0 internal links point at 0 broken URLs.
  • Links to other sites3 issues
    3 destinations answered with an error, 7 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 24 destinations checked.
    −1.2 points
  • Redirects3 issues
    4 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.3 points
  • Non-200 responses7 noted
    7 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 3 of them are pages, 0 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability1 issue
    1 of 40 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.3 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 59 image references have no alt attribute.
  • Heavy assets43 issues
    43 assets larger than 500 KB among 431 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages3 issues
    3 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −0.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage4 issues
    3 sitemaps listing 38 URLs: 1 crawled page missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 3 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −0.6 points
  • Internal link counts1 noted
    Internal link counts for 40 pages; 1 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 39 pages have fewer than 200 words. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL formatOK
    All 43 page URLs are plain lowercase addresses without parameters.
  • Canonicals1 noted
    1 of 40 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives40 noted
    40 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text12 noted
    12 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure16 noted
    16 of 39 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 1 noindex or canonicalized page excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length17 noted
    17 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies1 noted
    1 URL answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 40 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 474 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 40 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed InsightsNot checked
    Not checked yet: PageSpeed Insights runs on the top pages once the crawl has finished.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2331 sites, median 79%, average 78%

petvet.org scores 87%, higher than 80% of the 2331 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 7 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 31 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 70 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 85 sites80%: 107 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 100 sites84%: 106 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 69 sites87%: 75 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 64 sites90%: 33 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 11 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 69 sites87% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several SEO issues that require attention, including redirects, non-200 responses, and title tag problems. Addressing these will enhance user experience and improve search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Redirects

    Why: 4 redirecting URLs can confuse users and dilute link equity.

    How: Update or remove redirects, especially those leading to the homepage.

    Checks: redirects

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: 7 URLs returning non-200 responses can negatively affect SEO and user experience.

    How: Identify and correct the URLs or implement appropriate redirects.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: 13 pages have title issues that may impact visibility in search results.

    How: Shorten title tags to under 60 characters and ensure uniqueness.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve Meta Descriptions

    Why: 3 pages missing meta descriptions may lead to lower click-through rates.

    How: Add concise and compelling meta descriptions to the affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add Missing Headings

    Why: 2 pages lack heading structure which hinders content readability.

    How: Insert proper H1 tags on the identified pages to improve SEO.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address Orphan Pages

    Why: 3 pages with no internal links may be overlooked by users and search engines.

    How: Add internal links to these pages from relevant content.

    Checks: orphan-pages

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The website petvet.org lacks a Content Security Policy, exposing it to risks from malicious content and script attacks. Additionally, third-party scripts are running without integrity checks, increasing vulnerability if those scripts are compromised. Lastly, sensitive paths are listed in robots.txt, which could reveal sensitive information or areas of the site.

  • 0 high
  • 1 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: No CSP header or meta tag leads to unrestricted script, style, and frame loading, increasing risk of XSS attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header like `Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';` on all HTML pages.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Third-Party Scripts Without Integrity ChecksLow

    Why it matters: Running scripts from external domains without Subresource Integrity (SRI) can lead to vulnerabilities through compromised resources.

    Fix: Consider adding Subresource Integrity attributes to script tags or use a Content Security Policy that specifies trusted sources.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  3. 3

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: Listing private paths in robots.txt may expose sensitive areas of the site, revealing information to potential attackers.

    Fix: Remove or secure sensitive paths like `/wp-admin/` with appropriate access controls.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 40 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://petvet.org/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/spokane-valley-wa-veterinary-appointment/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/about-pet-vet-hospital-and-wellness-center/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/veterinarian-spokane-valley-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/veterinarian-spokane-valley-wa-reviews/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/pet-vet-hospital-and-wellness-center-gallery/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/spokane-valley-wa-veterinary-jobs/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/pet-behavioral-counseling-spokane-valley-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/pet-dentistry-spokane-valley-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/pet-dermatology-spokane-valley-wa/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://petvet.org/pet-digital-radiology-and-ultrasound-spokane-valley-wa/ → no content-security-policy
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 5 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • birdeye.com (1 script tag)
    • us.vetstoria.com (40 script tags)
    • boards.greenhouse.io (41 script tags)
    • www.google.com (39 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
10 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 40 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 40 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 40 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 40 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    44 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near petvet.org

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling petvet.org from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own petvet.org?