Scanned sites / perisonandsoper.com / 2026-09-14-1834

perisonandsoper.com scan from 2026-09-14 18:34:14 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-14-1834

Scanned 2026-09-14 18:34:14 UTC, finished 2026-09-14 18:46:45 UTC. Found with openstreetmap overpass

Site: https://perisonandsoper.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

66/ 100Needs work

On September 14, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 71 pages and 216 assets of perisonandsoper.com, starting from https://perisonandsoper.com/. It scored 66 out of 100, a result that needs work. 11 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (64), thin content (59), heavy assets (22); 6 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−7.6), thin content (−7), heavy assets (−6). 10 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium3 medium and 2 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
71
Assets fetched
216
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
11 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

287 of 287 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 11 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags18 issues
    18 of 64 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −2.7 points
  • Meta descriptions64 issues
    64 of 64 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.6 points
  • Headings15 issues
    15 of 64 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −1.3 points
  • Broken links2 issues
    2 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −0.6 points
  • Links to other sites4 noted
    0 destinations answered with an error, 4 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 11 destinations checked.
  • Redirects2 issues
    55 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −0.1 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    57 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 4 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.3 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 64 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 3 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 67 image references have no alt attribute. 1 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets22 issues
    22 assets larger than 500 KB among 216 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages55 issues
    55 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −3.3 points
  • Sitemap coverage55 issues
    6 sitemaps listing 64 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 55 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −4.9 points
  • Internal link counts3 noted
    Internal link counts for 67 pages; 3 worth a look.
  • Thin content59 issues
    59 of 64 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7 points
  • Duplicate content2 issues
    1 group of pages with identical HTML.
    −0.2 points
  • URL format23 noted
    23 of 71 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals3 noted
    3 of 67 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives67 noted
    67 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text2 noted
    2 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure47 noted
    47 of 64 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length2 noted
    2 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomalies52 noted
    52 URLs answered in a way worth looking at.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 67 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 14 response headers recorded across 287 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 67 pages; 58 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 67 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2873 sites, median 80%, average 79%

perisonandsoper.com scores 66%, higher than 10% of the 2873 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0751500%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 0 sites34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 1 site37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 2 sites40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 2 sites43%: 3 sites44%: 2 sites45%: 6 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 6 sites49%: 8 sites50%: 6 sites51%: 7 sites52%: 8 sites53%: 9 sites54%: 9 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 17 sites58%: 18 sites59%: 10 sites60%: 15 sites61%: 13 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 29 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 33 sites66%: 43 sites67%: 43 sites68%: 42 sites69%: 52 sites70%: 46 sites71%: 80 sites72%: 76 sites73%: 81 sites74%: 82 sites75%: 87 sites76%: 95 sites77%: 109 sites78%: 132 sites79%: 111 sites80%: 128 sites81%: 125 sites82%: 132 sites83%: 119 sites84%: 131 sites85%: 106 sites86%: 94 sites87%: 96 sites88%: 80 sites89%: 75 sites90%: 55 sites91%: 59 sites92%: 43 sites93%: 29 sites94%: 25 sites95%: 15 sites96%: 18 sites97%: 16 sites98%: 8 sites99%: 3 sites100%: 150 sites66% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has several critical SEO issues, including broken links, problematic redirects, and thin content on many pages. Addressing these will enhance user experience and search visibility.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links create a poor user experience and hurt SEO.

    How: Update or remove the links pointing to broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: A high number of non-200 responses can lead to crawl issues.

    How: Identify the URLs and ensure they return a 200 status, either by fixing or removing them.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update Title Tags

    Why: Titles are crucial for SEO; many are too short or duplicated.

    How: Revise all problematic title tags to be unique and of appropriate length.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Add Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions help search engines and improve click-through rates.

    How: Create descriptive meta descriptions for all affected pages.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Address Heading Issues

    Why: Proper headings improve content structure and SEO.

    How: Ensure all pages have a single H1 and revise as necessary.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Improve Thin Content

    Why: Thin content can lead to poor rankings.

    How: Add valuable, relevant text to pages identified with fewer than 200 words.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

Your website has several important security issues that need addressing. Key vulnerabilities include a lack of HTTP Strict Transport Security, inadequate protection against clickjacking, and missing MIME sniffing protection headers. Additionally, a Google API key is exposed, which could lead to unauthorized use. Implement these fixes to enhance your site's security.

  • 0 high
  • 3 medium
  • 2 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users not using HTTPS could be intercepted.

    Fix: Add the header: Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Clickjacking Protection (X-Frame-Options)Medium

    Why it matters: Lack of X-Frame-Options allows your content to be framed by other sites, increasing clickjacking risk.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Frame-Options: DENY

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  3. 3

    Exposed Google API KeyMedium

    Why it matters: A publicly accessible Google API key can lead to unauthorized use and potential charges.

    Fix: Restrict the API key usage by origin in the Google Cloud console.

    Evidence: Keys and secrets in page code

  4. 4

    Missing MIME Sniffing Protection (X-Content-Type-Options)Low

    Why it matters: Without this header, browsers can misinterpret file types, potentially leading to security issues.

    Fix: Add the header: X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

  5. 5

    Third-Party Scripts Lack Subresource IntegrityLow

    Why it matters: Without SRI, changes to third-party scripts can compromise your site's security.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity for scripts or a suitable Content-Security-Policy.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://perisonandsoper.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/attorneys-and-staff/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/clients/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/location/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/free-legal-consultation/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/hello-world/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/library/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/home/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/seminar/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/content-templates-workspace/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/home/attachment/001/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/home/attachment/003/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    2 of 67 HTML pages send x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://perisonandsoper.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/attorneys-and-staff/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/clients/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/location/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/free-legal-consultation/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/hello-world/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/library/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/home/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/seminar/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/content-templates-workspace/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/home/attachment/001/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/home/attachment/003/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://perisonandsoper.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/attorneys-and-staff/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/clients/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/location/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/free-legal-consultation/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/hello-world/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/library/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/home/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/seminar/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/content-templates-workspace/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/home/attachment/001/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://perisonandsoper.com/home/attachment/003/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundKeys and secrets in page codeMedium

    1 credential-like value found in code served to every visitor: Google API key.

    • Google API key AIzaSy…Jk (39 chars) in https://perisonandsoper.com/location/: browser keys are expected in pages, but must be restricted by HTTP referrer and API in the Google Cloud console
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • www.googletagmanager.com (40 script tags)
    • maps.googleapis.com (1 script tag)
8 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 67 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKContent Security Policy

    A Content-Security-Policy is set on 2 of 67 pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    40 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKVulnerable JavaScript libraries

    1 library version recognised, none with known vulnerabilities.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • OKSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt does not point at admin, backup or private paths.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near perisonandsoper.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling perisonandsoper.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own perisonandsoper.com?

  • Claim this site to manage the listing, hide it from the public lists, or keep it.
  • Want it gone instead? Ask through the support form or e-mail support@diyseohub.com, naming perisonandsoper.com. Removal needs no account and no proof of purchase.