Scanned sites / mmoptometry.com

SEO report for mmoptometry.com DR 3

The latest Site Spider scan of mmoptometry.com, with 1 scan on record. Each scan is at its own address, for example /domain/mmoptometry-com/2026-09-10-1308.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Latest scan

Scanned 2026-09-10 13:08:08 UTC, finished 2026-09-10 17:37:48 UTC

Site: https://mmoptometry.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

88/ 100Good

On September 10, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 41 pages and 149 assets of mmoptometry.com, starting from https://mmoptometry.com/. It scored 88 out of 100, a good result. 6 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by meta descriptions (19), title tags (13), links to other sites (4); 14 checks passed. Most of the points went to meta descriptions (−4.5), title tags (−3.8), links to other sites (−1.6). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium2 medium, 1 low and 1 info findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
41
Assets fetched
149
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
6 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

190 of 190 discovered URLs were fetched. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 102 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags13 issues
    13 of 26 pages have title issues. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −3.8 points
  • Meta descriptions19 issues
    19 of 26 pages have meta description issues. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −4.5 points
  • HeadingsOK
    0 of 26 pages have heading issues. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Broken links2 issues
    3 internal links point at 2 broken URLs.
    −1.2 points
  • Links to other sites4 issues
    4 destinations answered with an error, 52 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 102 destinations checked.
    −1.6 points
  • Redirects5 issues
    5 redirecting URLs, 2 of them chained.
    −0.6 points
  • Non-200 responses2 issues
    102 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 7 of them are pages, 2 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.6 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • IndexabilityOK
    0 of 26 indexable pages have indexability warnings. 8 pages noindex by design.
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 182 image references have no alt attribute. 99 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assetsOK
    0 assets larger than 500 KB among 149 fetched assets.
  • Orphan pagesOK
    0 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
  • Sitemap coverageOK
    1 sitemap listing 26 URLs: 0 crawled pages missing, 0 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 0 reachable only via the sitemap.
  • Internal link counts8 noted
    Internal link counts for 34 pages; 8 worth a look.
  • Thin contentOK
    0 of 26 pages have fewer than 200 words. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format2 noted
    2 of 41 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • CanonicalsOK
    0 of 34 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives34 noted
    34 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text1 noted
    1 destination are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure4 noted
    4 of 26 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 8 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt length15 noted
    15 images over 100 KB; 0 with alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404sOK
    None of 34 pages answering 200 reads like an error page.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 15 response headers recorded across 190 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 34 pages; 0 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 59 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this site sits among all scanned sites

2316 sites, median 79%, average 78%

mmoptometry.com scores 88%, higher than 84% of the 2316 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0581150%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 8 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 19 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 36 sites67%: 33 sites68%: 35 sites69%: 46 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 70 sites73%: 69 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 86 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 106 sites79%: 86 sites80%: 105 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 115 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 107 sites85%: 85 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 74 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 61 sites90%: 35 sites91%: 44 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 22 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 11 sites96%: 9 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 4 sites99%: 1 site100%: 70 sites88% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site has a few critical issues affecting SEO. Prioritize fixing broken links and non-200 responses. Also, address title and meta description issues for better optimization.

  1. 1

    Fix Broken Links

    Why: Broken links hurt user experience and SEO performance.

    How: Update or remove internal links pointing at broken URLs.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve Non-200 Responses

    Why: Redirects can slow down site performance and confuse search engines.

    How: Redirects should be reviewed and consolidated to minimize hops.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Optimize Title Tags

    Why: Improving title tags enhances visibility in search results.

    How: Shorten titles over 60 characters and ensure uniqueness.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Update Meta Descriptions

    Why: Meta descriptions influence click-through rates from search results.

    How: Add missing meta descriptions and ensure they are unique.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Fix Redirect Chains

    Why: Chained redirects can degrade performance.

    How: Eliminate unnecessary redirects and point directly to the final URL.

    Checks: redirects

  6. 6

    General Content Review

    Why: Content issues may lead to poor user experience.

    How: Review all pages for quality and relevant information.

    Checks: titles, meta-descriptions

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

This review identifies critical security issues on your website to enhance its protection. Most notably, there's a lack of a Content Security Policy and the use of a vulnerable jQuery version. Addressing these issues will improve your site's defenses against attacks.

  • 0 high
  • 2 medium
  • 1 low
  • 1 info
  1. 1

    Missing Content Security PolicyMedium

    Why it matters: Without a CSP, your site is vulnerable to cross-site scripting (XSS) and other code injection attacks.

    Fix: Implement a Content Security Policy header like: Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  2. 2

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibraryMedium

    Why it matters: jQuery 1.9.1 has several known vulnerabilities that could be exploited depending on usage.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to version 3.5.0 or later to eliminate these vulnerabilities.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  3. 3

    Third-Party Scripts without SRILow

    Why it matters: Scripts from other domains can be compromised, leading to potential malicious code execution.

    Fix: Consider implementing Subresource Integrity (SRI) for third-party scripts or use a Content Security Policy that includes these domains.

    Evidence: Third-party scripts

  4. 4

    Sensitive Paths in robots.txtInfo

    Why it matters: The robots.txt file may expose sensitive internal paths that should not be public.

    Fix: Revise access controls for the path listed in robots.txt: Disallow: /wp-admin/.

    Evidence: Sensitive paths in robots.txt

What the checks found

  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 34 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://mmoptometry.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/our-eye-clinic/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/blog/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/service/eye-exams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/service/childrens-eye-exams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/service/contact-lens-exams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/service/diabetic-eye-exams/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/service/myopia-control/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/service/emergency-eye-care/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/service/eye-disease-diagnosis-management/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/service/laser-eye-surgery-consultation/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mmoptometry.com/brands/glasses/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    1 library with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.9.1 in https://mmoptometry.com/wp-content/themes/understrap/js/theme.min.js?ver=2.7.0.…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 4 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • data.staticfiles.io (34 script tags)
    • unpkg.com (34 script tags)
    • cdnjs.cloudflare.com (16 script tags)
    • cdn.jsdelivr.net (15 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
9 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 34 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKHTTP Strict Transport Security

    strict-transport-security is set on all 34 HTML pages.

  • OKClickjacking protection

    x-frame-options is set on all 34 HTML pages.

  • OKMIME sniffing protection

    x-content-type-options is set on all 34 HTML pages.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    15 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Earlier scans of mmoptometry.com

No other scans of this site yet.

Sites scoring near mmoptometry.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling mmoptometry.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own mmoptometry.com?