Scanned sites / mikisdance.com / 2026-09-13-2212

mikisdance.com scan from 2026-09-13 22:12:20 UTC DR 0

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

Scan 2026-09-13-2212

Scanned 2026-09-13 22:12:20 UTC, finished 2026-09-13 22:51:08 UTC. Found on page 2 of brave web search results

Site: https://mikisdance.com/

Download SQLite databaseEvery page and asset from this scan, with the crawl events, in one file.

51/ 100Needs work

On September 13, 2026 the Site Spider crawled 367 pages and 611 assets of mikisdance.com, starting from https://mikisdance.com/. It scored 51 out of 100, a result that needs work. 12 of 27 checks found something to fix, led by title tags (245), meta descriptions (269), thin content (264); 8 checks passed. Most of the points went to title tags (−9), meta descriptions (−7.9), thin content (−7.8). 7 checks found something the score does not count, listed as noted. 10 checks were not run because the crawl fetched nothing for them. The list below shows each check's result, the fix plan, when present, explains what to do first, and the security review at the end of the page covers headers, transport, libraries and exposed files.

Security review: Medium4 medium and 1 low findings. See the security findings ↓

Pages crawled
367
Assets fetched
611
Status
Completed
Checks with issues
12 of 27
CoverageComplete crawl

978 of 1,059 discovered URLs were fetched, 1 blocked by robots.txt. The crawl reached everything it found. HTML only: nothing here ran JavaScript. 213 link destinations on other sites were checked.

  • Title tags245 issues
    245 of 269 pages have title issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −9 points
  • Meta descriptions269 issues
    269 of 269 pages have meta description issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.9 points
  • Headings266 issues
    266 of 269 pages have heading issues. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −5.9 points
  • Broken links20 issues
    231 internal links point at 20 broken URLs.
    −1.5 points
  • Links to other sites1 issue
    1 destination answered with an error, 192 could not be determined (timeouts, rate limits or refusals), of 213 destinations checked.
    −0.1 points
  • Redirects68 issues
    75 redirecting URLs, 0 of them chained.
    −1 points
  • Non-200 responses20 issues
    97 URLs did not return a 2xx response. 95 of them are pages, 20 with an error status; the rest are assets or redirects.
    −0.7 points
  • Rate limitedOK
    The site did not rate limit the crawler.
  • Indexability5 issues
    5 of 272 indexable pages have indexability warnings.
    −0.2 points
  • Image alt textOK
    0 of 556 image references have no alt attribute. 496 use an empty alt (decorative), which is fine.
  • Heavy assets95 issues
    95 assets larger than 500 KB among 611 fetched assets.
    −6 points
  • Orphan pages251 issues
    251 pages have no internal links pointing at them.
    −3.7 points
  • Sitemap coverage260 issues
    5 sitemaps listing 274 URLs: 2 crawled pages missing, 7 listed URLs broken or redirecting, 251 reachable only via the sitemap.
    −5.7 points
  • Internal link countsOK
    Internal link counts for 272 pages; none is a dead end or buried.
  • Thin content264 issues
    264 of 269 pages have fewer than 200 words. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
    −7.8 points
  • Duplicate contentOK
    0 groups of pages with identical HTML.
  • URL format120 noted
    120 of 367 page URLs are harder to read, share or cache than they need to be.
  • Canonicals5 noted
    5 of 272 pages have a canonical worth checking.
  • Robots directives272 noted
    272 pages carry a robots directive; 0 carry none.
  • Anchor text308 noted
    308 destinations are linked without useful anchor text, or with nofollow.
  • Title and heading structure208 noted
    208 of 269 pages could use the title, heading and snippet space better. 3 noindex or canonicalized pages excluded.
  • Image weight and alt lengthOK
    No image is over 100 KB or carries alt text over 100 characters.
  • Response anomaliesOK
    No redirect loops, header redirects or pages served as something other than HTML.
  • HTML and head validationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • hreflangNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Structured dataNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Near duplicatesNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Soft 404s1 noted
    1 page answer 200 but say they are not there.
  • AccessibilityNot checked
    Not checked: the accessibility audit runs in the browser. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to run it.
  • Link positionsNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before link positions were recorded. Scan the site again to run it.
  • PaginationNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.
  • Headers and cookiesOK
    0 cookies set by the site; 11 response headers recorded across 978 URLs.
  • Orphans in searchNot checked
    Not checked: import a Search Console Pages export on the scan page to find pages Google shows that the site does not link to.
  • Link ScoreOK
    Link Score (internal PageRank, 0-100) for 272 pages; 263 hold almost none (10 or less).
  • JavaScript renderingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan did not render pages. Tick "Include JavaScript rendering checks" when you request a scan to compare the served HTML with what a browser builds.
  • PageSpeed Insights5 noted
    Mobile performance 60 on average across 5 pages; 5 below Google's good thresholds.
  • SpellingNot checked
    Not checked: this scan was crawled before this check existed. Scan the site again to run it.

Where this scan sits among all scanned sites

2343 sites, median 79%, average 78%

mikisdance.com scores 51%, higher than 2% of the 2343 scanned sites. See the full ranking.

0591170%: 0 sites1%: 0 sites2%: 0 sites3%: 0 sites4%: 0 sites5%: 0 sites6%: 0 sites7%: 0 sites8%: 0 sites9%: 1 site10%: 0 sites11%: 0 sites12%: 0 sites13%: 0 sites14%: 1 site15%: 0 sites16%: 0 sites17%: 0 sites18%: 0 sites19%: 0 sites20%: 0 sites21%: 1 site22%: 0 sites23%: 0 sites24%: 0 sites25%: 0 sites26%: 0 sites27%: 0 sites28%: 1 site29%: 0 sites30%: 0 sites31%: 0 sites32%: 0 sites33%: 1 site34%: 0 sites35%: 2 sites36%: 2 sites37%: 1 site38%: 3 sites39%: 1 site40%: 3 sites41%: 1 site42%: 1 site43%: 3 sites44%: 1 site45%: 4 sites46%: 5 sites47%: 5 sites48%: 3 sites49%: 6 sites50%: 5 sites51%: 5 sites52%: 10 sites53%: 6 sites54%: 8 sites55%: 9 sites56%: 8 sites57%: 12 sites58%: 17 sites59%: 9 sites60%: 16 sites61%: 12 sites62%: 20 sites63%: 27 sites64%: 22 sites65%: 32 sites66%: 35 sites67%: 35 sites68%: 34 sites69%: 47 sites70%: 44 sites71%: 69 sites72%: 71 sites73%: 70 sites74%: 68 sites75%: 72 sites76%: 87 sites77%: 92 sites78%: 107 sites79%: 84 sites80%: 108 sites81%: 105 sites82%: 117 sites83%: 99 sites84%: 108 sites85%: 88 sites86%: 70 sites87%: 73 sites88%: 59 sites89%: 65 sites90%: 36 sites91%: 47 sites92%: 38 sites93%: 24 sites94%: 16 sites95%: 12 sites96%: 12 sites97%: 12 sites98%: 5 sites99%: 2 sites100%: 68 sites51% here100%90%80%70%60%50%40%30%20%10%0%

Green 90% and up (Excellent), lime 75 to 89 (Good), amber 50 to 74 (Needs work), red below 50 (Poor).

Internal link map

Loading the link map...

Start page (centre)OKRedirectErrorOrphanLinked from most pagesOne inbound link or noneRings = clicks from the start page. Size = inbound links. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom, click a page to see only its links.

Fix plan

Written by gpt-4o-mini from the scan findings

Written from an earlier version of the analysis. The findings on this page have been recomputed since, so counts and labels here may differ from what the plan describes. The advice still points at the same checks.

Your site requires significant improvements, particularly addressing broken links and enhancing content. Prioritize fixing these issues to boost your site's SEO health.

  1. 1

    Fix broken links

    Why: 231 internal links are broken, harming user experience and SEO.

    How: Identify all broken URLs and update or remove internal links pointing to them.

    Checks: broken-links

  2. 2

    Resolve non-200 responses

    Why: 97 URLs are not returning 2xx, affecting crawlability and indexing.

    How: Redirect these URLs to active pages or remove them if unnecessary.

    Checks: status-codes

  3. 3

    Update title tags

    Why: 244 pages have title issues, which impacts search rankings.

    How: Create unique, descriptive titles for each page, ideally under 60 characters.

    Checks: titles

  4. 4

    Improve meta descriptions

    Why: All pages lack meta descriptions, lowering click-through rates.

    How: Write compelling meta descriptions for each page, ideally under 160 characters.

    Checks: meta-descriptions

  5. 5

    Add heading tags

    Why: 266 pages have heading issues; headings are vital for SEO.

    How: Ensure each page has one clear H1 and relevant H2 tags.

    Checks: headings

  6. 6

    Address thin content

    Why: 264 pages have fewer than 200 words, hurting SEO performance.

    How: Enhance content on these pages, aiming for at least 300 words with valuable information.

    Checks: thin-content

Generated automatically; verify each change against your own site before relying on it.

Security review

Written by gpt-4o-mini from 16 checks over the crawl

The site has several security vulnerabilities, including missing security headers and outdated libraries. These issues could expose users to risks such as script injections and data interception. Immediate attention is recommended to enhance security.

  • 0 high
  • 4 medium
  • 1 low
  • 0 info
  1. 1

    Missing HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS)Medium

    Why it matters: Without HSTS, users typing the site address without HTTPS can be intercepted on their first request.

    Fix: Add 'Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains' to HTTP responses.

    Evidence: HTTP Strict Transport Security

  2. 2

    Missing Content Security Policy (CSP)Medium

    Why it matters: No CSP prevents the browser from restricting where scripts and styles may load from, increasing risk of attacks.

    Fix: Add 'Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self';' to HTTP responses.

    Evidence: Content Security Policy

  3. 3

    Missing X-Frame-Options HeaderMedium

    Why it matters: Lack of this header may allow clickjacking attacks by embedding content in malicious frames.

    Fix: Add 'X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN' to HTTP responses.

    Evidence: Clickjacking protection

  4. 4

    Vulnerable JavaScript LibrariesMedium

    Why it matters: Outdated libraries expose the site to known vulnerabilities that could be exploited.

    Fix: Upgrade jQuery to at least 3.5.0 and Bootstrap to at least 4.3.1.

    Evidence: Vulnerable JavaScript libraries

  5. 5

    Missing X-Content-Type-Options HeaderLow

    Why it matters: Without this header, the browser could execute files as scripts based on content rather than type.

    Fix: Add 'X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff' to HTTP responses.

    Evidence: MIME sniffing protection

What the checks found

  • FoundHTTP Strict Transport SecurityMedium

    No HTML page sends strict-transport-security. Without it a visitor who types the address without https:// can be intercepted on the first request.

    • https://mikisdance.com/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/news/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/contact/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/dress-code/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/faculty/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/policies/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/register-login-in/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/hair-makeup-for-2021-competition-season-details/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/hello-world/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/summer-dance/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/registration/ → no strict-transport-security
    • https://mikisdance.com/preschool-program/ → no strict-transport-security
  • FoundContent Security PolicyMedium

    None of the 272 HTML pages send a Content-Security-Policy header or meta tag, so the browser has no restriction on where scripts, styles and frames may load from.

    • https://mikisdance.com/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/news/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/contact/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/dress-code/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/faculty/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/policies/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/register-login-in/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/hair-makeup-for-2021-competition-season-details/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/hello-world/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/summer-dance/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/registration/ → no content-security-policy
    • https://mikisdance.com/preschool-program/ → no content-security-policy
  • FoundClickjacking protectionMedium

    No HTML page sends x-frame-options. Without X-Frame-Options (or a CSP frame-ancestors directive) the pages can be embedded in a frame on another site and overlaid with invisible controls.

    • https://mikisdance.com/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/news/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/contact/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/dress-code/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/faculty/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/policies/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/register-login-in/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/hair-makeup-for-2021-competition-season-details/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/hello-world/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/summer-dance/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/registration/ → no x-frame-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/preschool-program/ → no x-frame-options
  • FoundMIME sniffing protectionLow

    No HTML page sends x-content-type-options. Without X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff a browser may run a file as a script because of its contents rather than its declared type.

    • https://mikisdance.com/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/news/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/contact/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/dress-code/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/faculty/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/policies/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/register-login-in/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/hair-makeup-for-2021-competition-season-details/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/hello-world/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/summer-dance/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/registration/ → no x-content-type-options
    • https://mikisdance.com/preschool-program/ → no x-content-type-options
  • FoundVulnerable JavaScript librariesMedium

    2 libraries with published vulnerabilities: jQuery 1.9.1, Bootstrap 4.0.0. Whether they are exploitable depends on how the site uses them, but each has a fixed release.

    • jQuery 1.9.1 in https://mikisdance.com/wp-content/themes/nataraj-dance-studio/assets/js/bootstr…: CVE-2015-9251 (XSS via cross-domain AJAX), CVE-2019-11358 (prototype pollution), CVE-2020-11022, CVE-2020-11023 (XSS via HTML passed to DOM methods); fixed in 3.5.0
    • Bootstrap 4.0.0 in https://mikisdance.com/wp-content/themes/nataraj-dance-studio/assets/js/bootstr…: CVE-2018-14040, CVE-2018-14041, CVE-2018-14042, CVE-2019-8331 (XSS through data attributes in tooltip, popover, collapse and scrollspy); fixed in 4.3.1
  • NoteThird-party scripts

    Scripts run from 2 other domains without Subresource Integrity, so a compromise of any of them changes what runs on this site. (Tag managers and analytics rarely support SRI; a Content-Security-Policy that names these hosts is the usual control.)

    • stats.wp.com (40 script tags)
    • form.jotform.com (3 script tags)
  • NoteSensitive paths in robots.txt

    robots.txt lists 1 path that look private. robots.txt is public and does not restrict access, so it doubles as a map for anyone probing the site; those paths need real access control.

    • Disallow: /wp-admin/
6 checks passed, 3 not applicable
  • OKHTTPS

    All 272 crawled pages were served over HTTPS.

  • OKSoftware version disclosure

    The Server header names a product without a version, and there is no X-Powered-By header.

  • OKMixed content

    No HTTPS page loads a script, stylesheet, font or image over plain HTTP.

  • OKForms over HTTPS

    8 forms found, all on HTTPS pages posting to HTTPS addresses.

  • OKKeys and secrets in page code

    No API keys, tokens or private keys were found in the sampled HTML and scripts.

  • OKExposed files and listings

    None of the crawled URLs is a configuration file, backup, dump, repository folder or directory listing.

  • Not applicableReferrer policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicablePermissions policy

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

  • Not applicableCookie flags

    This scan predates the crawler recording the headers this check needs. Rescan the site to check it.

A passive review of what the crawl recorded: response headers, page and script contents and the URLs it found. It does not probe the site, test TLS settings or look for files that were not linked. Generated automatically; verify each finding against your own site before acting on it.

Sites scoring near mikisdance.com

Their neighbours in the SEO rank table, which orders every scanned site by health score.

DR is Ahrefs Domain Rating (0-100, backlink strength), used under its Domain Rating License.

This report was produced by the DIY SEO Hub Site Spider crawling mikisdance.com from its pages as published, the way a search engine does. It shows summary figures only.

Own mikisdance.com?